9/11 Study Concludes “Fire Could Not Have Caused Collapse”

Preliminary results of a two-year University of Alaska Fairbanks 9/11 study looking into the destruction of World Trade Center 7 indicates that "office fires" could not possibly have caused the collapse.

Preliminary results of a two-year University of Alaska Fairbanks 9/11 study looking into the destruction of World Trade Center 7 indicates that “office fires” could not possibly have caused the collapse.

In May 2015, a team of researchers began the two-year engineering investigation of the collapse of WTC7. Dr. J. Leroy Hulsey, of the University of Alaska Fairbanks, and two Ph.D. research assistants partnered with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

We will investigate the collapse. We probably will not be able to tell them what caused it, but I could tell them what did not,” Hulsey told MintPress in 2015.

The preliminary results of the two-year study have now been released. During an interview at the Justice In Focus Symposium, Hulsey said that the team has already investigated the official narrative that fire caused the building’s collapse – and they have dismissed it as false.

“It is our preliminary conclusions, based upon our work to date, that fire did not produce the failure at this particular building.”

The researchers are used finite element modeling to evaluate the possible causes of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse.

I am approaching it like most forensic engineers would. We’re looking at the structure itself, trying to put together all of the details of what was available, and in this case very little was available. Because most of it has been destroyed or it’s locked in vaults somewhere.

Activist Post reports:

When their study concludes in April 2017, Hulsey and his team will allow a panel of experts to analyze the data and submit the study to peer-reviewed journals. The researchers are promising a “completely open and transparent investigation into the cause of World Trade Center Building 7’s collapse,” and will post every step of their scientific process on WTC7Evaluation.org. The WTC7 Evaluation project will also include a review by a committee of technical experts who will vet the research being conducted by Dr. Hulsey and his students.

Ted Walter, Director of Strategy and Development for A&E 9/11 Truth, is in charge of working with the professor and raising money to fund the WTC7 Evaluation. Walter said that the project began in May 2015 and should should wrap up in April of next year.

“They are coming up with different scenarios of how hot the fires could have been in different parts of the building, and then for the next 6 months they will be running tests and scenarios,” Walter told Activist Post. “The last few months, early next year, will be all about putting the findings into a final report.”

Many 9/11 researchers now focus on the mysterious collapse of building 7. A number of 9/11 family members point to the collapse of WTC7 as a possible crack in the official story that could spark a new national conversation on the events of that day. WTC7 was not hit by a plane that day; however, it collapsed at 5:20 p.m. according to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), the official cause for the collapse was office fires.

A growing number of family members, activists, architects and engineers question the official theory for collapse and are seeking a new investigation into WTC7.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at Your News Wire. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@yournewswire.com
Follow: @baxter_dmitry
Baxter Dmitry
  • Frank C

    “Fire Could Not Have Caused Collapse” – Well, DUHHH! Any intelligent person could see that on DAY ONE!

  • http://www.financereports.tk dukigepu
  • cart00ner

    Which is why MSM never talks about building 7.

  • Jefferson Goldwater

    On 9/11 Either NBC or CBS showed building 7 live… They had the camera showing the entire building.
    Then, smallish exposions on ever floor, obvious and sequentially going down from the top of the building, then pancake collapse.
    To think this was unorchestrated is beyond accepting reality.

  • Pip Santos

    The owners of this world know they can pretty much do what they want. And the 99% can’t do anything about it. So what happened to all the convictions after Nixon resigned? The American beloved president Reagan pardoned all of them. So what are you gonna do about it? Pay your taxes and accept the reality that you are a slave. You and your descendants forever.

  • rcwarbirdbuilder

    The
    American Military High Command knows that Bibi Netanyahu ordered his
    Mossad and stateside Dual Citizens to attack America using nukes on
    9-11-01 on behalf of the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia (KM):Soon mainstream
    America will know that Bibi Netanyahu and his Likudist Party deployed
    the attack on America on 9-11-01 on behalf of the Rothschild KM:

    They thought that they had complete control over the CMMM and could
    prevent any of the secret IAEA and Sandia Labs investigation from ever
    being released to the American public. http://www.veteranstoday.com/…/the-hidden-history-of-the-i…/

  • Jonathan Mark

    I was working on an issue on 9-11-2001 for Flyby News for peace in space. Peace cannot exist without truth or justice. The resources prove beyond a shadow of doubt, 9-11 was a false flag political-military operation. https://flybynews.wordpress.com/2012/04/03/new-911-investigation-vs-new-world-order-2/

  • Ray George

    That’s great these moron’s take two years to tell us what Richard Gage and many others told us in two minutes.

    • Bryan Pospisil

      Thanks Ray but I think you’re missing the point. Gage is obviously a smart man and likely guided the research but the point is that these highly educated and qualified researchers took all variables into account during this investigation, laid out what facts were true, what NIST was missing in their investigation, and how it could have come down if the NIST variables were accurate (and then of course how the model came down compared to how the actual came down- which again wasn’t accurate), They then prompted an open discussion on the topic to see if there is anything they missed.
      They basically went through the report with a fine tooth comb and said NIST you overlooked this, this, this, and this. Had you included these in your in silica modeling, the building would not have fallen. This report seems to put the fire reason to rest. BTW these guys are not morons.