U.S. citizens have given up their constitutional rights following the tragic 9/11 attacks in New York under the guise of security needs.
Mike Berger of the advocacy group 911truth.org who questions the official account of the September 11 attacks, says the government used the 2001 terrorist attacks as an excuse to increase surveillance on citizens.
After 9/11 tragic events, the US government significantly increased surveillance on its citizens covering it up by extra security measures, media director of an advocacy group 911truth.org, Mike Berger, told Sputnik.
“In the aftermath of 9/11 attacks, the US government used to scare Americans, so they would give up their privacy,” Berger said before the 15th anniversary of the tragic events. “Today no one in the country questions why do people have to open their laptops in airports and allow federal agents to look into their personal documents.”
In October 2011, President George W. Bush signed the USA Patriot Act that changed US privacy laws and gave more power on tracking domestic and international communications to the National Security Agency (NSA) and the US Department of Defense.
Berger stressed that anti-terrorism policy seamlessly turned into a tool for taking away constitutional freedoms that US citizens used to exercise for hundreds of years.
“During [the] Obama administration, the propaganda became very successful. I don’t know who is coordinating it, but it clearly works,” Berger added. “Americans cannot accept the truth that the government is not interested in keeping the country safe.”
Berger emphasized that if the security measures worked as they were supposed to, the US government would not need to tighten the measures against people who release sensitive information.
“The Obama administration is more restrictive against whistleblowers as many people would think. When George W. Bush was serving as president, whistleblowers have not been arrested or prosecuted,” Berger noted.
In 2016, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) issued a declassified opinion stating that use of information collected by the NSA for domestic investigations satisfied constitutional standards. The FISC also gave its first approval for more NSA surveillance operations since the USA Freedom Act was passed in 2015.
Latest posts by Edmondo Burr (see all)
- Missouri Senator Regrets Calling For Trump’s Assassination - August 18, 2017
- Japanese Bomb Shelter Demand Soars As Korea Tensions Mount - August 18, 2017
- FDA Wants To Know What Public Thinks About CBD - August 18, 2017