Evidence of election fraud from the California primaries continues to emerge as machine-counted ballots were inexplicably changed from Bernie Sanders votes to Hillary Clinton ones.
The votes appear to have been flipped on hacked voting machines and central tabulators on nearly 15% of Sanders’ total votes.
Richard Charnin reports:
Sanders hand-counted share exceeded his machine-counted share in EVERY county. The probability of this occurrence is absolute ZERO.
Posted 6/25/2016 on Facebook by Phillip Wyler Evans:
In all machine-counted votes tabulated before 5:00 P.M. on 6-17 in all California counties, Bernie scored 14.2% less (36.9%) than he scored with hand-counted ballots (51.1%). In machine-counted votes that were tabulated AFTER 5:00 P.M. on 6-17, Bernie scored just 2.2% less (48.9%) than he scored with hand counted ballots. We are still trying to determine what portion of the votes before 5:00 are absentee from each county if anyone has that information.
Poll workers claim that 50% to 90% of voters who were supposed to have been eligible to vote in the Democratic primary were told they would have to vote using provisional ballots. There were two reasons for this:
1-previously registered voters’ names had been removed from the rolls.
2- Some were marked as vote by mail voters – but they had received no ballot in the mail. Virtually all who were not allowed to vote and forced to vote provisional ballots were Bernie Sanders supporters.
Poll workers in Los Angeles and Orange County report that Bernie won the electronic votes in their precincts by well over a 2 to 1 margin, the opposite of the vote count. The contrast indicates vote-flipping.
If you add the lower figure of 50% of voters who were not allowed to vote regular ballots for Bernie to the votes he received, you wind up with a substantial Sanders landslide victory in California. The primary beneficiary of the fraud is Hillary Clinton.
EARLY VOTER EXIT POLL – A 23% DISCREPANCY
Election Justice USA is a voter advocacy non-profit organization which demands a hand audit of the early mail-in ballots. It asserts that the Capitol Weekly early-voter exit poll conducted across the state of California yielded a 23 percent discrepancy in Los Angeles vote-by-mail ballots compared to the actual results.In Los Angeles area polling of the early round of mail-in voters, Hillary Clinton lead over Bernie Sanders was less than 10 percent.
“The discrepancy cannot be easily explained by demographic factors: the results of the Capitol Weekly exit poll were weighted by age and race. Moreover, the exit poll had 21,000 respondents, and was praised–prior to election night–by mainstream elections journalists, including Nate Cohn of the New York Times. While no exit poll can prove fraud, a significant exit polling discrepancy such as this constitutes cause for alarm, especially one of this magnitude. It’s also sufficient cause for immediate action: voters should bring pressure to bear on officials and demand an expanded hand audit.”
Acclaimed BBC reporter, author and election fraud expert Greg Palast calls provisional ballots “placebo ballots.”
“As I’ve previously reported, provisional ballots are “placebo” ballots that let you feel like you’ve voted, but you haven’t. Provisional ballots are generally discarded.”
Greg exposed the fraud in Florida in 2000. Nightline used his footage in covering the story.
Latest posts by Sean Adl-Tabatabai (see all)
- Largest Aspartame Study Ever Conducted Lists ‘Death’ As Side-Effect - January 23, 2017
- Trump Rioters Face 10 Years In Prison - January 23, 2017
- DOJ To Sue Over Clinton Election Fraud In New York - January 23, 2017