A Wyoming rancher is preparing to take his case to federal court after being threatened with over $16 million in fines from the Environmental Protection Agency.
The same agency that spilled millions of gallons of waste water into a Colorado River, but that’s another story.
It all began in 2012 when rancher Andy Johnson built a small stock pond in order to provide water for his livestock.
The EPA Ordered Johnson to dismantle the small pond he had built on his property, claiming it violated the federal Clean Water Act. The order came with the threat of a $37,000-per-day fine.
Infowars reports: Johnson, who says he obtained all proper permits prior to building the pond, believes the EPA has clearly overstepped its authority.
“We went through all the hoops that the state of Wyoming required, and I’m proud of what we built,” Johnson said. “The EPA ignored all that.”
In a statement to The Blaze, the EPA argued that they have been attempting for “many months” to work “cooperatively with Mr. Johnson to resolve the Clean Water Act issues.”
“EPA has not made any determinations regarding penalties in this matter nor made any penalty demand of Mr. Johnson,” the statement reads. “An order the agency sent to Mr. Johnson in January 2014 cites the maximum penalties for noncompliance established by Congress in the Clean Water Act. References to these penalty provisions are included in all EPA enforcement orders to ensure that respondents are fully aware of the relevant provisions of environmental laws.”
Despite the fact that Congress has exempted stock ponds from the Clean Water Act, the EPA appears to remain undeterred in their targeting of Johnson.
“Threatening me with ruinous fines even though I’ve done nothing wrong is extortionate,” Johnson told Watchdog.org. “This is a battle about more than my land, my livestock and my pond. The EPA is on a mission to expand its power. They want to take over jurisdiction over private property throughout the United States.”
A lawsuit was filed last week in the U.S. District Court , lawyers representing Johnson argue the EPA have overstepped its authority by fining the rancher.