Gun Owners Warned: ‘Avoid California’ After Second Amendment Ditched

Gun owners told to avoid California after the state ditches second amendment

Gun owners have been warned not to travel to California, after State officials secretly scrapped the Second Amendment – making it illegal for Americans to carry guns. 

On August 7, the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) issued a stark travel advisory warning to gun owners, warning them that if they enter California they risk being sent to jail.

Breitbart.com reports: The gun rights group is “warning law-abiding armed citizens that their civil rights could be in jeopardy due to that state’s restrictive gun control laws.”

SAF founder and executive vice president Alan Gottlieb observed:

The California Legislature has been out of control for years when it comes to placing restrictions on the Second Amendment rights of honest citizens. Right now, I wouldn’t suggest to any gun owner that they even travel through the state, much less to it as their final destination.

Lawmakers in Sacramento either ignored or have forgotten that in 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court incorporated the Second Amendment to the states via the 14th Amendment in SAF’s landmark case of McDonald v. City of Chicago. The Second Amendment’s protection of the right to keep and bear arms applies to state and local governments, but they seem rather oblivious to that fact in the halls of California’s Legislature.

He added:

If you are licensed to carry in your home state, that license is not recognized in California. It doesn’t matter how many background checks you’ve gone through or whether you took a gun safety course. Your license is no good in the Golden State, which suggests that your safety and the safety of your family are of no concern to state lawmakers or city administrators. You could be prosecuted for having a gun for personal protection, or you might get killed because you didn’t.

Gottlieb is spot on. California refuses to recognize any concealed carry permit other the one they issue. This is an expression of Democratic hegemony whereby they have made concealed carry licenses extremely difficult for Californians to acquire — fewer than 100,000 Californians have a license — and they do not want to provide a means for additional law-abiding citizens to be armed via reciprocity.

What does this mean? It means that when a visitor from another state drives into California, he is not supposed to be armed, regardless of the number of out-of-state concealed permits he possesses or the risks associated with being defenseless. None of these things matter because the Democrats have spoken.

Gottlieb’s verdict: “By not going to California, the life you save may be your own.”

  • Irmawratliff

    my roomate’s step sister makes $95 per hour on the internet. she has been laid off for 2 months. last month her paycheck was $21069 only working at home for four hours a day… ➤check out ➤this ➤site
    ➜➜➜http://www.GoogleFinancialCashJobs642ShopSound/Home/Wage….
    ✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔✔::::aa352.

  • Brendaeosborne

    United20a

    Google is paying 97$ every hour! Labor for couple of hours and have longer with companions and family! :!sq40d:
    On Tues I got a good new Land Rover vary Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy pleasing I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable however you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    :!sq40d:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash330TopBrands/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sq40l..,….

    • AssasinateSoros

      Brenda is from Cali

  • hatsofftothelittlefatkid

    California is the homosexual state..and its where Hollyweird is.. and sanfrancisco….. and heaps of other creepy stuff and places….. somebody should blow it up…….maybe the little fat kid will put it on his list of places to drop bombs in amewhorica.. gee wiz lets hope so….. it would clean up a lot of shit in one fell swoop…

  • Tall T

    California has no gang problems, they don’t need guns to protect themselves. Ooh shoot, I couldn’t even write that with a straight face. I can foresee robbery and shootings quadrupling in this state.

  • Tom

    I had already made the decision to never enter California again several years ago, though I lived there for 30 years. Twenty-five years ago when I left, it was already a worry to walk out of the building I lived in with even a cased firearm lest I panic some libtard snowflake into calling the police. It has gotten worse every year since. Alan Gottlieb is right — stay out!

  • Zaphod Braden

    There has never been a government that banned it’s own ARMED FORCES from “Keeping and Bearing” ARMS.

    Find one government in the history of humanity that felt a need to document a “RIGHT” for it’s ARMED FORCES to possess ARMS.
    Oppressive Governments are ALWAYS banning the People’S RIGHTS to arms.
    The claim that the Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment to give Our ARMED FORCES a “right” to keep and carry ARMS is S-T-U-P-I-D.
    The only reason for the Second Amendment is to clearly spell-out the GOD GIVEN RIGHT of INDIVIDUALS to keep & bear ARMS.
    The only reason for the BILL(list) of RIGHTS was to codify INDIVIDUALS’ GOD GIVEN RIGHTS.
    Has there ever been a government that was not chock full of it’s “rights” up to and including declaring itself to be the Lord God Almighty?! (Rome, Egypt, Israel,etc)
    Does the 1st Amendment mean the GOVERNMENT is allowed to give speeches? Try shutting up any Politician. But THEY would LOVE to shut YOU up, hence the FIRST Amendment.
    Anyone who tells you the 2nd Amendment applies to the Army or State Militia, is telling you they think you are STUPID.
    There has NEVER been a government that felt it had to codify it’s army’s/soldier’s “RIGHT” to “Keep and BEAR ARMS” because there has NEVER been a government that refused to allow It’s own soldiers to KEEP and BEAR ARMS!
    The Second Amendment was given to the People, like all the other rights in the Bill or Rights. This was confirmed by the SCOTUS in the DC vs Heller decision, where they stated that the “People” in the Second Amendment were the same “People” that are mentioned in the First and Fourth Amendment.
    The 2nd Amendment clearly guarantees the “right of the PEOPLE to keep and bear arms”, and certainly not “the Militia”.
    Why would “the Militia”, a type of army manned by citizen-soldiers as opposed to full-time “regulars”, need a constitutional amendment to guarantee they have the right “to keep and bear arms”?
    Is there any specific statement anywhere in the Constitution that the army Congress is empowered to raise has the “right to keep and bear arms”?

    Of course not. …………. That is assumed.

    It is implicit in the nature of all kinds of armies —- be they militia or regulars, volunteer, conscripted, or mercenary — to be armed.
    They are all “armed forces”.
    They all “bear arms”.
    They all carry guns.
    That is what they do.
    It certainly no more requires an amendment to the Constitution to state that “the Militia” has the RKBA , than a specific statement that the army Congress is empowered to raise may be manned by armed troops.

    “The [U.S.] Constitution is a limitation on the government, not on private individuals … it does not prescribe the conduct of private individuals, only the conduct of the government … it is not a charter for government power, but a charter of the citizen’s protection against the government.” Ayn Rand

  • sandy daniels

    califorication needs to secede from the USA especially if they have banned the second amendment

  • Ideas Time

    These corporate criminals are all committing treason by failing to uphold their oaths. What part about the second do they not understand? They are the domestic enemy.

  • SpeedersKill

    I support guns but i also support states rights and if CA wants to do this, so be it. The Supreme Court has no authority to “incorporate” the second amendment to the states. If you want to revise the constitution, you have to go thru the amending process.

    • Margaretwdavis

      Sign33d

      Google is paying 97$ dependably! Work for couple of hours and have longer with sidekicks and family! :!sw23d:
      On Tues I got an excellent new Land Rover vary Rover from having attained $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable however you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      :!sw23d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash313FinderSub/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sw23l..,…..

    • Latoyawjones

      Human33d

      Google is paying 97$ dependably! Work for couple of hours and have longer with sidekicks and family! :!sw213d:
      On Tues I got an excellent new Land Rover vary Rover from having attained $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable however you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
      :!sw213d:
      ➽➽
      ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash503FinderSpring/Pay$97/Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!sw213l..,..