Judge Dismisses 9/11 Saudi Lawsuit As Crucial Evidence Withheld

A corrupt judge throws out the 9/11 lawsuit against Saudi Arabia as crucial evidence is withheld

The Lawyers who represent families of some of the 9/11 victims, are accusing the US government of withholding crucial information about the terror attacks.

They say this has hindered their attempts to sue Saudi Arabia for their alleged funding and support of  al-Qaeda. reports:

Those representing the families of victims said they will appeal the decision of US District Court Judge George Daniels, who ruled that there wasn’t enough evidence to prove Saudi Arabia was involved in funding the group, or the 2001 attacks.

“The allegations in the complaint alone do not provide this court with a basis to assert jurisdiction over defendants,” Daniels wrote in his ruling.

However, lawyers bringing forward the complaint promised to appeal the decision. James Kreindler, an attorney for one of the plaintiffs’ groups, said the judge “got it wrong”, while another attorney, Jerry Goldman said he was confident that an appeal would “render the justice that… the families of the victims of the attacks on 9/11 so rightly deserve.” Central to complaints about the case and ruling were accusations that crucial pieces of information were held from claimants by the US government, which lawyers believe could have influenced the final decision.

“Evidence central to these claims continues to be treated as classified,” lawyer Sean Carter said.

“The government’s decision to continue to classify that material certainly factored into this outcome.”

Questions Remain Over Alleged Saudi Involvement

The decision represents a major setback for the families of those killed in the 9/11, with representatives pushing for billions of dollars worth of damages, if they can prove that Saudi Arabia was involved in supporting al-Qaeda.

Saudi Arabia was initially dismissed from the case in 2005 as a result of US foreign sovereign immunity laws, which sets limits on whether a foreign nation can be sued in US courts. However, the case was re-opened in 2013, when a federal appeals court ruled that there was a legal exception to pursue the claims, as the circumstances were extraordinary. The US government’s 9/11 Commission report of 2003 found that there was no evidence that Saudi Arabia had funded al-Qaeda, however critics have argued otherwise.

Fifteen of the 19 hijackers involved in 9/11 were Saudi citizens, with the Gulf kingdom accused of assisting those involved in the attacks and partly financing the operations of al-Qaeda.

Lawyers were also critical of judge Daniels’s decision to dismiss evidence from former al-Qaeda operative Zacarias Moussaoui, also known as the ’20 hijacker’, who claimed that a Saudi prince financially supported him during his training at flight school, and also gave other attackers significant amounts of money.