NPR: 25 Million Votes For Clinton ‘Completely Fake’ – She Lost Popular Vote

NPR admit Hillary Clinton 'lost the popular vote' as 25 million fake votes are discovered

A study published by NPR reveals that over 25 million Hillary Clinton votes were completely fraudulent, meaning that the Democratic candidate actually lost the popular vote by a huge margin. 

A study by the Pew Center claiming that over 800,000 non-citizens voted for Hillary Clinton failed to take into account dead and fraudulent voters which totalled over 25 million “registered voters”.

According to reports, illegal aliens combined with dead voters and “multiple state” voters explains why Hillary appeared to have won the popular vote over Trump during this years presidential race.

Infowars.com reports:

“A report by the Pew Center on the States finds that more than 1.8 million dead people are currently registered to vote, and 24 million registrations are either invalid or inaccurate,” NPR reported in 2012, which is ironic given how NPR is heavily controlled by Democrats.

And many of the dead, registered voters somehow keep voting Democrat from beyond the grave, most recently in Philadelphia, Penn. and Colorado.

It’s also worth noting that the U.S. population has increased since 2012, meaning that there’s likely more dead and invalid voters than before.

“…The Pew study found that almost 3 million people are registered to vote in more than one state,” NPR added.

That’s because when a new resident registers to vote in a state, officials usually never bother to tell his former state about the change in voter residency.

Under the “catch and release” immigration program by the Obama administration, illegal aliens were routinely given bus tickets to travel to other states by immigration officials, so it was theoretically possible for non-citizens to register to vote in a border country illegally, then register to vote in another state after their taxpayer-funded bus dropped them off.

Clinton won most of the 163 most populous counties in the US that account for half of the total votes in the election, including dense urban areas in New York and California, yet she only won the popular vote by 2.8 million votes, which reveals the lack of enthusiasm voters had for her in comparison to Trump – and that Democrats would have depended more on illegal votes.

A portion of the 24 million invalid voter registrations combined with a portion of the 1.8 million dead voters and the over 800,000 known illegal voters could explain the difference of 2.8 million votes, and it’s worth noting that the 800,000 figure could be a low, conservative estimate.

That said, a popular vote victory is meaningless; if the president was elected by popular vote, then both Trump and Clinton would have campaigned in entirely different states because only densely population regions of the U.S. would decide who would become president.

Without the electoral college, the United States of America would be reduced to the United States of New York and California, with 48 other vassal states.

Yet notice how Clinton campaigned in other, less populated states.  They knew the popular vote was meaningless ahead of the election.

However, the popular vote is useful as a barometer for voter fraud since the most populous countries are also the most susceptible to election tampering by illegal, invalid and dead voters.

  • http://www.RestlessBoomers.com/ Restless Boomers

    The entire election process is a fraud. America is no longer a republic, but rather a fascist state controlled by elite Joo banksters and oligarchs. The rest is all a theatrical production.

  • fishing4truth

    Democrats Busted On Camera Stuffing Ballot Boxes – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8YsRU0TFQTY
    Hillary Campaign Caught Ripping up Trump Ballots – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RegGHCCh_m0
    Illegal Immigrants Caught On Tape Stuffing Ballot Box – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gh0Wc5hsV8U&t=67s
    Hillary Clinton Recieved One Million Votes From Illegal Aliens – http://yournewswire.com/hillary-clinton-one-million-votes-illegal-aliens/
    Mathematician Uncovers Widespread Election Fraud – http://yournewswire.com/mathematician-election-fraud/
    Hillary Voter Fraud (37 videos) – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dkgTCLTuy1Y&list=PLfZY2D0ERNFI7dc2c8LztHJW93EU6CXQ1

    • Duhh

      unfortunately the 1st video is from the BBC and the Russians voting fraud! AND thats a Russian Flag on the left..

      • user_kp

        @harrypatkowski:disqus how many flat out lies do you have to debunk before people start to realize there is fake news on the Interwebs? Serious question. It has been non-stop fake news posted by my conservative friends. They don’t even seem to care when I prove that what they posted was a lie. They just latch on to the next ALL CAPS fake news article in their news feed. You can’t fix stupid.

        • trump blast

          First you must use reliable sources to debunk a fake site and snopes is not reliable !! As the owner is so pro obuma he called the truth a lie even though it was recorded by some twenty news venders when the event happened !!! So if you used snopes its nowounder they ignored you !!!

          • HenryJ

            This site is fake news. Simple as that.

          • Mark Choi

            Typing words into the internets doesn’t make them true. If you are going to claim Snopes is unreliable you need to cite EVIDENCE.

          • Jay Mooser

            Here’s your evidence on snopes. Maybe as many times as you told people to provide proof maybe, just maybe you should look into your own damn resources. When any media outlet won’t answer questions and essentially says it is a secret then it is not to be trusted source for ANYTHING. https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers/#4697374227f8

          • Mark Choi

            First, you provide NO “evidence on scopes”. Yo merely cite a Forbes article that in turn references a Daily Mail article. Now, I understand why you chose to obfuscate the fact that your entire point rests on a Daily Mail article, as the Daily Mail is a known purveyor of unsourced, purely fabricated, obviously biased nonsense, but trying to remove the claims a step by using the Forbes intermediary is fooling no one.
            Moreover, the Forbes article does NOT help your case. Did you even read it?!?
            It makes NO claims that Snopes is unreliable, that it has EVER misstated the facts, or slanted a claim, and it most certainly did NOT support any claim that it is “fake news”.
            Second, what you are failing to understand (how surprising) about the case detailed in the Forbes piece is that the issue he wouldn’t answer questions about was NOT the affiliations of the people who submit articles. In fact, he answered them directly. The issue he refrained from answering questions about related to his divorce proceedings, an issue for which he had legal and moral reasons preventing his candor, not leas of which was a legally binding nondisclosure agreement.

            Nice try, but no participation trophy for you , snowflake
            Third, I “look into [my] own damn resources” just fine, thanks. You should try doing the same.

          • trump blast

            You mean like snopes denying liberal congressmen/women sat their biased buts down while the rest of congress gave a two minute standing ovation from a seal team member’s widdow ??? Or many others just as obvious fake debunking by snopes that I have no intention of wasting time to list !!! But you go right on believing every lie told you over the years !!! As Thomas Jefferson said those who don’t read the newspapers are better informed than those that do read the newspapers !!!

          • Mark Choi

            Why yes, exactly like that, since the pictures used to show that those particular members of Congress did not stand for Carryn Owens’ speech were form a COMPLETELY DIFFERENT part of the speech, and multiple videos and still pictures of the actual event show incontrovertibly that all those Democrats were, indeed, standing.
            As for your claims about Jefferson, it is not surprising that you cherry picked that quote, and furthermore, conveniently failed to repeat the full quote, or put it in context. First, he was decrying the very same type of media, like Brietbart today, that is causing the current raft of issues with fake news.
            Moreover, his full quote, that you conveniently mis-paraphrased and abbreviated, shows this to be the case”
            “The man who never looks into a newspaper is better informed than he who reads them; inasmuch as he who knows nothing is nearer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.”

            But as to newspapers as a whole, this quote (complete and accurate) is far more informative:
            “The basis of our government being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers, or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.”
            He furthermore went on: “But I should mean that every man should receive those papers and be capable of reading them.”

            So, you were saying, snowflake?

          • trump blast

            As I was watching live that night I know they sat down during that part of the event !!! Now can you say otherwise ???

          • Mark Choi

            Yes I can, as I have seen actual video of that portion of the speech, from multiple angles, and those actual videos show definitively that you are not only full of shit, you are a liar.

          • trump blast

            I’ll take the live action over a mere video and I was watching as the event happen not some liberal news clip like you chose to watch and it was easy to see who was sitting down and who was standing !!! More noticeable was all those women democrats wearing white sitting down as one remained standing !!!

          • Mark Choi

            You can take whatever you want. Your claims are lies, which is why you can present ZERO actual evidence.
            And your claims about what you saw during the actual event are lies, as they did not happen.

          • trump blast

            Why should I lie about watching a bunch of hateful democrats sitting down when its obvious that they sat down throughout the whole time Trump was speaking !!! And I did not post links because I never post links to TV archives or any other item of discussion as someone like you can then say that its a fake site or not there so its not real !!! So now with that excuse ripped away you try to call me a liar with now way to prove your hypothesis !!! Thus you have made a fool of yourself without my input !!!

          • Mark Choi

            Why should you lie? Who knows, maybe because it is just in your nature. Or maybe because you are covering for an intellect incapable of ascertain actual facts from evidence.
            Or maybe because you’re just a liar.
            And how convenient that all of a sudden you “don’t post links”. You are fooling no one. You can’t post links because no such links exist because IT DIDN’T HAPPEN.

            So, to be perfectly clear:
            YOU
            ARE
            A
            LIAR.

            And I can easily post links of the original speech to prove it.

            Liar.

          • trump blast

            As you obviously failed to watch it live what good are your links ??? As you continue to refuse to hear the truth !!! By the way live means there is no edited screens as you like to claim so as I am watching the standing ovation for two minutes the news crew has not jumped to another part of the speach from later on !!!

          • Mark Choi

            First of all, in 2017, live most certainly does not mean that. Even live broadcasts are on a delay.
            But I’m not climbing you saw an edited broadcast, I’m claiming you are LYING about what you saw. Because the only way you saw that is if you had a specially crafted feed direct to only your television.

          • trump blast

            You keep right on buying those liberal lies and I’ll keep right on telling the truth !! As that 3 second delay is for blanking out foul language and nudity and is not enough time to cut an in taped section of a live broadcast in to show the democrats being a bunch of boarish idiots while there’s a standing ovation for two min. That came before the section you claim that clip to have come from !!!
            You see I know all about that 3sec. Delay as well and why thy have it !!! And there was no tampering with the live broadcast that night and I tuned in at the beginning and watched the whole thing and can tell they had about 4 cameras focusing on Trump the congressman/women the visitors and the widow and surrounding personnel !!! So any cutting was from camera to camera front back and side views !!! But not one time jump !!!

  • Cordstreet

    Shiiiiit. What about lost or changed absentee ballots. How would ANYBODY know if their absentee ballot even got to it’s desired destination, never mind if it was tallied?

  • Billy S DuBose

    The average American is all about securing this Nation, and realizes we are under no obligation to accept anyone into this country, it is a privilege. Most of us would love to see a drastic reduction on all immigration as most that come here end up on Government assistance. Taxpayers need relief! Seniors and Disabled Vet.s need cost of living raises and improved health care at lower costs. It is time for Americans first ! We can no longer pretend to be financially able to support the world. and we shouldn’t put aliens needs ahead of our own American needs. The time is for honesty, not ignorance, and certainly not arguing! After so many years of our own citizenry being forced to make sacrifices for the common good, we should not be made to feel guilty for wanting to say it is our time to be considered. We need security, and economic growth. We need to heal as a Nation, and come to some common agreements on numbers of immigrants allowed in America. America’s Statue of Liberty stands for all, not just aliens wanting to come to her shores!

    • HenryJ

      The people that we were keeping out were already granted a “privilege” which granted them entrance into the USA by contract of a green card they were already using, a new green card or other type of visa to enter the USA. They had already been vetted to enter this country and had a contract with the US government to be able to do so. It was the office of the President who unconstitutionally broke our end of the contract. That is why the courts got involved and that is why Trump’s Executive Order was repudiated by the courts.

    • Shaudi Sardi

      Good post Billy! Very honest, thoughtful, and common sense statements! Mr. Trump is trying to ‘give us back our Country’ so, we need to step up and act like the owners that are ready to take back control!!!

    • Randy Sprague

      Totally agree with your comments.. But I’d like to see the authenticated NPR report on this — it seems out of step for Alt-Left NPR to make such a pronouncement. Does anyone have a link to the NPR-sourced report?

      • BoilerFan

        The links you inquired about are actually in the story, above.

        • raffaelecafagna

          Sorry ; you replied to a post that is 12 days old .

          • BoilerFan

            I’m well aware of when the article was posted. Just thought you might appreciate knowing the links were there…in case nobody else brought it to your attention. I was trying to be helpful.

          • raffaelecafagna

            Yes of course I do appreciate it . Thanks .
            No hard feelings .

        • Mark Choi

          No, they aren’t, which you’d know if you have bothered to check your facts. But since when did knowing WTF you were talking about ever stop you brainless sock puppets on the right from claiming things that had no basis in fact?
          The links above do NOT point to the original research, and that research does NOT say what the moronic author of this article is claiming it says, which is why Jesse RIchman or Old Dominion University, who wrote the first paper mentioned about, is telling both Trump and his fake news surrogates in the fake press, like that empty mouth piece Sean Adl-Tabatabai to STOP misquoting and misusing his paper:
          http://disq.us/url?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwtkr.com%2F2017%2F01%2F26%2Fodu-professor-wants-president-trump-to-stop-misquoting-research%2F%3AjcvJCatDDBKcwaLp56hVTD2LR30&cuid=3566908

          • Jusme

            You Muslim?

          • Mark Choi

            You stupid?

          • Joe

            Woe are you a mouthful of communist feces. or just a sorry ass pink cup cake from the left who has no self respect or respect for others, don’t ask people to do your dirty work for you, which is typical of you left wing cowards, who our real American president keeps shutting you down with every word you squeeze from between your cheeks are lies.

          • Mark Choi

            First, learn English you moron. The word is “whoa”. And commas are not periods.
            Second, no one is asking anyone to “do [their] dirty work for [them]. If you are going to make a claim, it is YOUR “work” to support it with EVIDENCE. Evidence you don’t have because the claim made in this bullshit article is FALSE.

          • trump blast

            Mark whoa is stop !!
            Woe is fearfulness !!!

          • Mark Choi

            First, the word “woe” is not what the O.P. ,meant, and it makes no sense in the context in which it was used.
            Second, “woe” does NOT mean “fearfulness” you moron. Get a fucking dictionary, FFS!

          • trump blast

            Woe be to you who call good bad and bad good !!

          • Mark Choi

            You realize you’re not actually helping your point, right?
            Using the word in a sentence does not prove what it means, nor does your claimed definition even make any sense in the sentence you used!
            You know what does? A fucking dictionary!
            Here’ I’ll help you out:
            Woe (n)
            A great sorrow or distress.

            It does NOT mean “fearfulness”.
            Learn English, FFS.

          • trump blast

            Was that from Wikipedia ???

          • Mark Choi

            No, it’s from a thing called “the dictionary”. Clearly you have never heard of it. It lists words in alphabetical order along with their definitions.
            Here’s some specific examples:
            https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woe
            woe

            —used to express grief, regret, or distress

            https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/woe
            woe

            NOUN

            literary

            1 Great sorrow or distress (often used hyperbolically)

            http://www.dictionary.com/browse/woe?s=t
            noun

            1. grievous distress, affliction, or trouble:

            NOTE NOWHERE DOES ANYONE DEFINE “WOE” AS “FEARFULNESS”.

          • trump blast

            Deep trouble is the source of fearfulness !! But then you can’t think in those terms as its beyond your understanding !!! Just like facts !!

          • trump blast

            Every red letters set of words is a link dummy !!!

          • Mark Choi

            I am fully aware of what links look like. What is your point? No one in this thread other than me posted any links.

          • trump blast

            Those links are in the very story you are trying to discredit !! And by claiming there were no links to follow you showed your ignorance of what the links were and how to find them !!! As for no one posting any links but you I saw one posts of nothing but links without your name attached !! So you can’t read as well !!!

          • Mark Choi

            Wrong. AGAIN, the links in the “very story” do NOT point to the original research, nor to ANY evidence that the claims made are actually true.
            Furthermore, I did NOT claim there were links to follow, I claimed that neither you, nor anyone commenting here, had presented ANY citations to back up their claims, and that the original article did not, either.

          • trump blast

            That’s not our task as you need to do your own research and stop depending on others to do your homework !! Our task is to discuss these items !!!

          • Mark Choi

            No, it is your task to do YOUR research, which, again, either you didn’t do or you were too stupid to understand, since, again, NONE of the citations even claim that there were 25 million illegal votes cast, let alone that they were cast by illegal aliens.
            And until you can post evidence, you can’t discuss any of it with any claim to informed discourse.

          • trump blast

            It is you who disagrees with the information given and refuses to understand those who have kept track of these things over the decades !!! But then that is the liberal way to call facts fiction and truth lies !!!

          • BoilerFan

            Wow!!! Looks like you’re simply another unhinged lefty. Can’t reason with obnoxious assholes like you. Go troll somewhere else.

          • Mark Choi

            You can’t reason with anyone unless you present actual FACTS.
            Note that you have none of your own, and can present NONE to challenge mine.

          • koldwindblows
      • Mark Choi

        First of all, there is no such thing as the “alt-left”. Simply making shit up out of thin air doesn’t make it true.
        Second, you won’t find an “authenticated NPR report on this” because the claims made in this “article” are entirely fabricated. I.e., they’re lies.
        Neither Pew, nor Jesse Richman from Old Dominion University, the author of the first mentioned study, said ANYTHING even remotely resembling the claims made here. Because they’re nonsense.

        • Spacewarp

          There is no such thing as the alt right so if you asshats on the left can make up terms, then we can too. Now, you can also look at some simple facts.

          I hate to burst your bubble of leftist lies, but let’s get to some truth.

          From 2000 to 2016 Los Angeles County had a steady growth in population.

          From 2000 to 2012, each election cycle eas between 15,000 and 25,000 increase in voters.

          In 2015, California allowed illegals to get drivers licenses. The moter voter provision required they be automatically registered and the DMV to turn over the information to the Secretary of State’s office. The head of the DMV, in an interview, stated that because the Secretary of State’s office didn’t have proper procedures in place to handle the removals, they would not be forwarding them.

          The increase for 2011 to 2016? Over 790,000.

          Please explain to me how with no other demographic changes, the huge discrepancy happened without illegals voting in massive numbers.

          Combine that with Obama coming out on TV and encouraging illegals to vote…..

          • Mark Choi

            First, yes, there is such a thing as the alt-right. The term was coined by the people who started the “movement”. They coined that term to refer to THEMSELVES, and made it clear to whom it applies.
            There is no such thing as an alt left, and no definition to give it meaning. You are merely trying to piggy back on the fact that the alt-right has been universally panned, even by the right, as the “bad” right, and make a similar baseless charge about a section of the left.
            Again, the left “alt-right” wasn’t made up by people on the left, you idiot, it was made up by people on the RIGHT. In particular, the word was coined by White supremacist Richard Spencer in 2010 to define a conservative movement centered on white nationalism, racism, white supremacism, and neo-Nazism.
            You simply have no idea WTF your babbling about.
            This is also evidenced in your next idiotic comment.
            California did NOT allow illegal aliens to vote. In fact, the motor voter bill does NOT automatically register a person to vote, it merely crates an opt out system, where those who do not opt out, have their information automatically collated to be transferred to the Secretary of State’s office to begin the registration process. As Alex Padilla, California Secretary of State said:
            “The way automatic registration works is relatively simple: Eligible citizens are registered to vote when they show up at a Department of Motor Vehicles office to obtain a driver’s license or state ID. The DMV gives the eligible voter a chance to opt out if they prefer not to register. If the person does not opt out, the DMV electronically transfers their voter registration information to the Secretary of State’s office, rather than making election officials enter data by hand from paper registration forms…

            “… Automated voter registration is actually a more secure way of doing things,”
            Furthermore, potential voters “have to demonstrate proof of age, the vast majority of time people are showing a birth certificate or a passport, which also reflects citizenship. That’s arguably more secure than someone checking a box under penalty of perjury,” Padilla said.

            Moreover, IF the “head of the DMV” was refusing to to forward the applications, guess what, you’re automatically wrong, because if the applications aren’t being forwarded, NO ONE IS GETTING REGISTERED TO VOTE.

            Do you even pay attention to what your writing?
            Of course you don’t because you’re a mother mindless sock puppet with your masters’ hand up your ass telling you what to say and write, with no idea what it actually means.

            Moreover, even if everything you wrote are true (And again, NONE of it is) just because people are registered to vote does NOT mean they actually are voting.

            Also, Obama never encouraged illegals to vote.

            You’re not only stupid, you’re a liar.

          • Spacewarp

            Wow You are really stupid. The alt-right movement was coined to cover a whole segment who didn’t have their ideology to the left of Castro. Anyone who is not a leftist is automatically labeled “alt-right” because you can’t stand to have anyone disagree with you. The “alt-left” movement is just as real. The leftist fascists who loot, riot, assault and in general act like the brownshirts of Nazi Germany.

            As for the really stupid part, you state that something didn’t happen, and then literally post a link that shows the information that it actually did. Or are you just completely dense? Oh, wait. You’re a leftist, so yes, you’re really that dense. You don’t get it. There are two systems. One is for the registration. The second is the verification system. But, obviously, you’re too dang stupid to read.

            So, stop calling me a sock puppet, when you don’t even have the intelligence to actually beat out the ball of yarn require to create a sock.

            As for a liar? Nope. But, you go ahead and believe that. I don’t really care what leftist scum like you think of me.

          • Mark Choi

            Wrong. As I wrote, the term “alt-right” was SPECIFICALLY coined by white supremacist Richard Spencer in 2010. He made quite clear what he meant by it.
            You have no clue WTF you’re talking about.
            Moreover, the link I posted did nothing of the kind, you idiot, Sorry you have such a hard time with math, but 100,000 DOES NOT equal 25 million. Moreover, 100,000 is just an upper limit estimate. He has no data to prove that number as an actual number, and he has not attempted to do so, you ignorant sock puppet.
            Also, his estimates have NOTHING to do with California and its voter registration system.
            There is NO evidence it is being used for ANY significant registration of illegals, and the system is designed to make that next to impossible, as the numbers make clear.
            Finally, of course you care, snowflake, or you wouldn’t keep replying.

          • trump blast

            We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years….It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

            David Rockefeller – Bilderberg Meeting – June 1991 – Baden, Germany

            Thomas Jefferson said, “I consider trial by jury as the only anchor
            yet imagined by man by which a government can be held to the
            principles of its Constitution.”

            Thomas Jefferson

            “The Jews control Hollywood and use it to promote their own agenda.”

            –         Marlon Brando, actor.

            All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident. –

            Arthur Schopenhauer, philosopher, 1788-1860

            “In a time of universal deceit, speaking the truth is a revolutionary act.” –

            White Christian, George Orwell, 1984

          • Mark Choi

            II am a nazi sympathizer, a racist, and a child molester who likes to have violent anal sex with children under 4.

            –trump blast. personal communications – October 2015 – Phuket Thailand

            See how that works?

            You have NO proof Rockefeller actually said that, nor is it even remotely relevant even if he did.
            But thanks for outing your true racist, antisemitic agenda.

          • trump blast

            Actually my source can prove that Rockefeller did say it !! Along with many others who’s quotes I came across !! But by typing my handle onto your beliefs does not show that I typed it because it lacks my metadata that is not shared but can still be found by fact checkers !!! Unlike rubes such as you !!!

          • Mark Choi

            No, your source can’t. Which is why neither you nor anyone else has posted such proof.

            And you might want to add “metadata” to the rapidly growing list of English words whose meanings you don’t know.

          • trump blast

            Go to your search engine and type famous quotes just like I did !!! As Rockefeller has said many thing during his life it might take a dummy such as you a long time to find his quotes !!! And never tell a programmer what he may or may not know !!! As it is metadata that doomed Clinton when she used her private server to send and receive classified data !!! As it contains the originating addresses of all email and information packets sent over the internet !!

          • Mark Choi

            Going to a search engine and typing in quotes is NOT a “source”. That you think so shows exactly the type of poor critical thinking skills that allowed fake news sites to flourish.
            Also, first, I suspect I was writing code before you were born, starting with punch cards with assembler and FORTRAN on a PDP-11 running TOPS. Second, again, you used the term metadata incorrectly. bringing up Clinton is irrelevant to your original use which was, and I quote:
            “But by typing my handle onto your beliefs does not show that I typed it because it lacks my metadata that is not shared but can still be found by fact checkers.”
            Also, e-mail long form headers are NOT “metadata”.

          • trump blast

            Never bet on things you can be sure of !!!

        • Sunspot

          >First of all, there is no such thing as the “alt-left”.

          He’s right. It’s the CTRL-Left

          • Mark Choi

            Aside from the questionable attempt at computer humor, that doesn’t even make any sense.

          • Sunspot

            Of course it does! The left has a boner for “control” as in “control of your money, control of your kids, control of your business, control of your property.”

            There has never been a more fitting description in the entire history of human language, including the Greek golden age!

          • Mark Choi

            No it doesn’t and you whining that it does does not make that so, snowflake.
            And the left loves control? That’s funny, coming from a defender of the party that attempts to legislate morality at every turn, who can be with whom, who can marry whom , what chemicals I can put in my body, what I can do with my body, what I can and can’t say, what I can and can’t burn as an expression of my political positions, and on and on and on.
            The hypocrisy is monumental.

          • Sunspot

            I forgot to add that the left wants control of who gets which cakes baked for them and when.

          • Mark Choi

            You adding that does not substantially help your argument.
            Or address anything that was said.

          • Sunspot

            Crap, I also forgot to let you know that the left also wants control over people’s self defense. Does that clear it up?

          • Mark Choi

            No. And straw man arguments aren’t actually valid arguments.
            Especially since you haven answer to ANYTHING that is being said to you. Like the fact that the right want to legislate morality at every turn, who can be with whom, who can marry whom , what chemicals I can put in my body, what I can do with my body, what I can and can’t say, what I can and can’t burn as an expression of my political positions.
            There is a reason the word “liberal” is used, since it refers to LIBERTY.

          • Sunspot

            Well shoot… I’m a loss here. Since I’m surrounded by college educated people, I have trouble discussing things below a certain level. I didn’t think it was necessary to actually define terms down to this point, so let’s clarify before the argument can proceed:

            Definitions:

            1. Control is word meaning to directly, forcefully influence people’s behavior.
            2. CTRL is short for “control” (taken from the abbreviation for the control key on a standard keyboard)
            3. ALT is also a key on the standard keyboard, opposite the CTRL key
            4. The comedic opposite of ALT-Right would be CTRL-Left
            5. CTRL-left is also a double entendre and appropriate because of the examples I have given above, of the left wing asserting control over very personal parts of private citizens’ lives.

            Now that we’ve clarified the meanings of words, there is no longer any grey area and you understand.

          • Mark Choi

            I understand perfectly. It does not make what you said correct. First, control is not the opposite of alt. Nothing is. So the only real opposite is the localized alt-left.
            Nor does it address the numerous factual, logical, and philosophical errors that continue to plague all your posts.

          • Sunspot

            Of course CTRL is the opposite of ALT! Look on your keyboard! CTRL is on the left, ALT is on the right!

            Nature has an incredible symmetry, doesn’t it?

          • Mark Choi

            No, it’s not, and simply repeating it over an over again does not make it so.
            Being on the opposite side of the keyboard no more makes it “opposite” than “S” is opposite of a semicolon, or 3 is the opposite of 0.
            Being on the opposite side of does NOT equal “opposite”.
            Moreover, I already spotted you this little juvenile attempt at humor in my very first post, so why you keep harping on it is a mystery. Maybe because you have no other point.

        • koldwindblows
          • Mark Choi

            What, exactly, is your point? That Pew Center paper not only dose not back up the assertions made here, NOWHERE in it does it say that 25 Million illegal votes were cast. ANYWHERE. You do know how to read, right?
            Or did you just follow the orders of your puppet masters and paste that link because the orange hand up your ass made you do it?

  • Grimcrotch

    EVERYTHING about this story is from a 2012 NPR release, it has absolutely NOTHING to do with trump or the 2016 election. this guy and news source is fake as fuck.

    • trump blast

      Where’s your proof as Trump did not run in 2012 ????

      • Grimcrotch
        • trump blast

          Again changing some dates does not make a fake story out of real facts !!! So your proof is some date has been changed ??? Not good enough where is the proof that the research is wrong ???

          • Grimcrotch

            what part of ‘they added trumps name to it because it wasnt in the original story from 4 yrs ago’ do you not understand you fucking numbnuts.

            1) the original story from 2012 doesnt have trumps name in it, as he did not run for president then.

            2) this is the 4yr old story, but has the date updated and trumps name added to it to make it look as if it is about clinton vs trump.

            i never said the research was wrong, it simply pertains to a different election that didnt have trump in it. this is a fake story because it has absolutely nothing to do with 2016 elections. polls, comments, dates, names, events, NOTHING in this story happened in 2016, you fucking idiot.

          • trump blast

            All names aside the facts don’t change THERE WAS VOTER FRAUD and they found proof of voter fraud while doing stein’s recount that favored Clinton !!!! So what if they added Tramps name it does not change one single fact !!! In fact the numbers from this year might even be higher !!!

  • Susan Windham

    Grimcrotch is STILL WHINING!#!#
    #WEWON#YOULOST#BE A BIGBOY#DONTCRYSNOWFLAKE

  • PoliticalCorectnesIsARedPlot

    Your Article would read and sound more convincing if only you used correct nomenclature it’s voting blocks by counties not countries it perforce makes you sound like an illiterate boob and as an EDITOR you should at least be able to error check your own article otherwise YOU need a good proof reader.

    • Barbie

      It’s not FAKE NEWS, SNOWFLAKE. JEANINE PIRRO WOULD NEVER PUT OUT FAKE NEWS

      • Steve Butler

        It’s from 2012 Einstein

        • trump blast

          And that changes the facts of voter fraud how ??? If it happen 4 years ago it happened last year the socialistic democrast keep playing the same CD !!

    • Freedom Rules

      Before You Moan About The Editors Spelling, Check Your Own User ID For Spelling Errors, Dope !!

  • Stephen B. Childress

    KILLARY & Obama for PRISON, Obama told Illegals to vote

    • Barbie

      And so did Hippie California Gov Jerry Brown.

      • Dukie

        That’s an insult us hippies tyvm…lol

    • Jane Long

      Yes!!!

    • Mark Choi

      First, you’re an idiot. Second, NO study EVER claimed Clinton got 25 million votes, and third, even the author quoted here is telling both Trump and his fake news surrogates in the fake press to STOP misquoting and misusing his paper:
      http://wtkr.com/2017/01/26/odu-professor-wants-president-trump-to-stop-misquoting-research/

    • Joe

      Yes he did, and when Sessions questioned him, he folded up like the sleazy coward that he is and said – “I never said that ” which he did and I saw it as it happened. Lying POS Muslim trash, needs to go back to where he was born, which btw was not Hawaii, because Hawaii is 5,000 miles from Africa.

      • Mark Choi

        No he didn’t. And you saw nothing of the kind, liar.
        Oh, and apparently you Trumpeters didn’t get the message. Even your orange, fascist, microcephalic, kewpie-headed shit-flinging macaque Donald Trump admits he was born in the U.S..
        Oh, and learn geography, you mindless sock puppet. Hawai’i is over 17000 kilometers or almost 11,000 miles from Africa, moron.

        • trump blast

          bout voter fraud.

          “I think there’s been studies.There’s one that came out of Pew in 2008 that shows 14 percent of people voting were non-citizens,” Spicer said.

          Richman tells News 3 that Spicer was not only confusing another study with his own from 2014, but also exaggerating the numbers.

          He says while his study did find evidence that some non-citizens do vote…it’s not nearly enough to make up the difference in the most recent popular vote !! “”

          This statement does not prove your point !!! But it does prove illegal immigrants did vote !!! And as the reviews are a few years out of date the numbers have grown quite a lot !! Add to that that brown did indeed allow those illegals to have drivers licenses and that they were registered to vote and Brown’s state Secretary did not forward the list of ineligible drivers for voting rights onto the election board !! Thus allowing them to vote illegally !!! Now are you up to date yet ????

          • Mark Choi

            First, no “study” showed any such thing. Moreover, it most certainly DOES prove my point.
            Second, Richman’s research had literally NOTHING to do with the claim that Obama told illegals to vote.
            Nor does Richman’s study “prove” anything, as he himself states. It merely indicates the possibility.
            Did you even read the actual study? Of course you didn’t you brainless sock puppet, because not only would that require mental acumen, and actual reading, but your puppet masters did not approve it as reading material.
            Third, your last bit has already been addressed as a false claim.
            And the “list” that the California Secretary of State purportedly failed to send was NOT the list of ineligible voters, it was the list of registrations, you idiot.

          • trump blast

            As you are the sock puppet denying things based on democrat lies and saying there there’s no studies and then you try to use a study to prove your point !!!

          • Mark Choi

            And again, repeating what was said to you and turning it around, the “I know you are but what am I technique) is not an argument, unless you’re four years old.
            And your utter ignorance about what you’re talking about is made starkly clear by claiming I was “try[ing] to use a study to prove my point”.
            No, I was using the study’s author to prove my point, when he demanded the Trump administration stop mischaracterizing his work and stop misusing his study to support points that it does not actually support.
            Take it up with him.

          • trump blast

            As you failed to read the articles with understanding you fell for the that’s not what I meant when I made this statement line but his numbers showed the truth and his deflection shows he is against Trump and for Clinton !!!

          • Mark Choi

            I failed at no such thing. Again, there is a reason, that you are either ignoring or are not mentally competent to understand, that the original study author has demanded that the Trump administration cease using his paper, since he keeps using it incorrectly, as do you. Not me making that claim, it’s the ORIGINAL AUTHOR.
            And the numbers are factual claims. You can attempt to refute them, but making character assassinations does NOT make the numbers any less true. If the numbers came from Hitler or from Gandhi, Stalin or Pope Francis, the numbers are no less true or not true.
            Logic hurts like a bitch.

          • trump blast

            And yet you deny the logic !!! That the number grow yearly as does the population both natural citizens of the USA ! And those who choose to come here without following the laws set up to keep that growth managable so that the newcomers can adapt to our customs and laws !!!

          • Mark Choi

            Logic? You wouldn’t know logic if it fisted you in the ass. Do you want me to list the various logical fallacies you employ in your arguments by name? Starting with ad hominem?
            And the numbers do NOT keep growing. Not that it matters or is even remotely relevant, as the “numbers” are of people who for whatever reason failed to be removed from voter rolls, NOT the number of people actually voting illegally. There is NO evidence this happens to ANY significant degree, a point made by the author as well.

          • trump blast

            Tell that to the relatives who keep getting their parents mail in ballots after telling the clerk of the elections board about the status of said person !!! And each year the population gets larger so the percentage grows with the population !! 20% of 10 is 2 20$ of 10’000 is 2’000 and the numbers in this election was over 125’000’000 out of 300’000’000+ possible voters so yes even 5’000’000 illegal voters is a possible illegal voters out of 26’000’000 illegal immigrants !!! And you refuse too see that fact because you believe the liberal lies who try to hide the truth !!

          • Mark Choi

            Again, yelling “I know you are but what am I” while running around with you fingers in your ears may have worked for you when you were 6 (and it may work now with the inbred morons you surround yourself with) but it doesn’t work with intelligent adults.

          • trump blast

            Who said I was dealing with an intelligent person ??? The fact that you keep calling people liars just because they watched the live broadcast instead of your video clips shows a lack of knowledge !!!

          • Mark Choi

            I am call you a liar not because you watched the live broadcast, but because you are LYING about what you saw.
            Nor does stating that show anything about my knowledge.
            But unless you have a rational explanation for the video clips, the only person with a “lack of knowledge” here is you.

          • trump blast

            Yes You keep right on buying those liberal lies and I’ll keep right on telling the truth !! As that 3 second delay is for blanking out foul language and nudity and is not enough time to cut an in taped section of a live broadcast in to show the democrats being a bunch of boarish idiots while there’s a standing ovation for two min. That came before the section you claim that clip to have come from !!!
            You see I know all about that 3sec. Delay as well and why thy have it !!! And there was no tampering with the live broadcast that night and I tuned in at the beginning and watched the whole thing and can tell they had about 4 cameras focusing on Trump the congressman/women the visitors and the widow and surrounding personnel !!! So any cutting was from camera to camera front back and side views !!! But not one time jump !!!

  • Chris Flum

    Please remind me when I am dead to cancel my voter registration and to Stop Voting.. I just know that when I am dead I am going to come back and vote democrat so Jesus will accept me..

    • trump blast

      Heysus may accept you then but Jesus will only accept those who have faith in him and are redeemed by his blood !!!

    • AngB

      Some states HAVE automatic drop off voter registration list after a death certificate is issued. I read a woman’s comment who said after her husband died she remembered this, checked with her states and sure enough his name had been removed!

      We need photo ID (which should indicate YOU ARE A CITIZEN) AND auto drop off voter registration after death certificate issued! Those two things would remove MILLIONS of registered Democrats!

      • Cat Carillo

        Not in Chicago

      • Jennifer Sands

        We already have this in the form of a SS card, all we have to do is add our photos. All could be done very quickly inside the SS office!

        Edit to add: Matter of fact the most important number in all of our lives has no photo – to prove it is you, and is asked for like it was a penny!

    • TAP True American Patriot

      I really cant tell if your being sarcastic or serious. But if you vote Democrat rest assured your not with God. Simply analyze Trumpers as comparied to the actions of Liberals.

      For a proper understanding read about Sodom and Gomorrah. They were debaucherious (liberal) cities.

    • DoraG38

      Took me two tries to get the state of Oregon to remove my husbands name and quit sending out the ballots. If I was a crooked liberal, just think how those two extra votes might have made a difference! I am only one of thousands of people who lost their spouses or moms and dads in our state. We need to get back to voter booths and stop all this by mail stuff where anyone can get a ballot and vote.

  • BobbyBarker

    This site should be renamed “yourfakenews dot com”.

  • truthseeker53

    Groan. Good article but POOR/NO proofreaders.

  • Occams
  • TheWild Webster

    This seems to be based on a Washington times piece that hinges it’s premises on a study in 2014 by Jesse Richman. Further investigation shows that Richman himself denounced the Washington Times article:
    https://fs.wp.odu.edu/jrichman/2017/01/27/i-do-not-support-the-washington-times-piece/

  • Cliff Love

    VOTER IDs NOW would stop or taper this WAY back!!! Also, I want a receipt for my cast vote!!!
    There is NO reason why we shouldn’t get a receipt report of our votes (just like from a CC machine when you buy a stick of GUM!!!) or maybe an e-mail option?!?!?!

    • HenryJ

      Voter IDs have been proven to suppress votes, mostly of Democrats. That is exactly what the GOP want. At the point of registering to vote is where the voter ID is currently required and needed. And voting IS a right — one of our most fundamental of rights. It is not a privilege like needing a license (ID) to drive a car. To infringe on that right is unconstitutional.

      Legally there is very little instance of voter ID fraud. Truth. And where it occurs it seems to happen as much or more in the GOP camps more than with Democrats.

    • trump blast

      As I can’t responto henryJ I’ll try indirectlyAnd why is that ??? Are those democrats afraid of being identified ??? Are they running from the law for some crime ??? A photo ID is not a bench warrant nor is it biased it shows that you are who you say you are legally and said ID could be your drivers license or any other government recognized ID that has a photo of the owner on it !!! And don’t forget you must show ID to claim insured packages sent by the USPS !!

      • dainz

        Dems are against voter ID…how would their illegals and dead people vote if they had to show ID!!

        • trump blast

          They would find a new way !! Just look how their rigged ballot boxes almost worked !!!

  • PatM

    Article is supposition. Pew research study was done in 2012! Talked about people who have died still on voter registration rolls, not that they actually voted. Also talks about people being registered to vote in more than one state like Trump’ s daughter Tiffany, son-in-law Jared and advisor Steve Gannon, not that there is any proof or facts to back this up. Using article’s logic, could mean Trump had people voting for him illegally! Also makes assumptions about illegals voting with no corroborating facts. They assume that since population has increased in last four years the approximately 800,000 dead people on voting rolls, people registered in more than one state and illegals that MIGHT have voted is now 24 million!!! Using that logic the 3 Trump family members and adviser that we know about as well as those we don’t might be 3 million illegal votes for Trump. HA, HA, HA! MORE FAKE NEWS

    • trump blast

      Are you sure ??? I’ll bet due to lazy state registering system operators I’m still registered in Fla. Even though I changed over to Tenn. Last year for easier voting with no middle man in the way !!! And if it can happen to me it can happen to anyone moving from state to state !! And I’ll bet further there are many registered I as many as four states for the same reason !!!

      • countvoncount

        It’s not illegal to be registered in two states, it’s illegal to VOTE in two states. Trump’s daughter Tiffany is registered in California (where she lives) and Pennsylvania where she went to school. Steve Bannon is registered in two states. Jared Kushner is registered in two states. As long as they didn’t vote in two states, they’ve done nothing illegal.

        Interestingly, every person I know that is registered in two places is a firm GOP voter. Maybe I should write an inflammatory fake news article about it and try to make broad generalizations that make it appear that Trump cheated.

        • trump blast

          I did not say it was !! But I did say it was due to lazy people in each state for not notifying a newly regesterd voter former state of the change of states for said person who might believe that this is how it should be done because doing the same when moving city to city or county to county the former voting precincts are updated each time you register !!!

  • Joe Lederhouse

    I’m not sure I want to believe something as badly proof read as this.

  • user_kp

    For God’s sake, you’d have to be a complete idiot to believe this for a second. http://www.snopes.com/25-million-fraud-votes-for-clinton/

    • trump blast

      As do you if snopes is your only choice of fact finders !!! I’ve checked some of their so-called fake reports and found their call of fake to be false !!!

    • AngB

      Snopes IS NOT TO BE TRUSTED ANYMORE! All online “fact check” sites are compromised. At least 6 months ago people were warned to NOT USE THEM!

      • locomom

        By whom? Trump?

        • trump blast

          No by people like me who back check snopes and friends !! And find that they lied about many things

  • Freeman1776

    Got to this page because i saw a picture of Scotty Pippin on facebook with a weird headline about him becoming a car washer. When I clicked on it, there is no story, just spam to get me to click this page! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/8172281778a24cbb5afeebf6444c7082008ad10e855495fa4f1373bed865f18a.png

  • jerry tarkanian

    This is total bs. As fake as it gets.

  • Surly Curmudgen

    Like always the leftists come running loudly proclaiming there is no proof of fake votes and again my response is “methinks they doth protest too much”.
    The left has been winning elections this was for over sixty years. What has their backsides torqued with this election is they had a huge effort this time and still failed to steal it.

    Just to rub it in Trump probably won the real votes by five million.

  • Charles Volcher

    She should go to jail for VOTERS FRAUD

  • Ron Hussey

    The election was rigged just as Trump said, Bernie’s own party gave him the shaft, and the billionaire socialist globalist moron that owned Obama, and Hillary, George Soros, just didn’t rig the election enough. Now the degenerate billionaire George Soros is on the warpath making sure America, and Americans pay for not electing a corrupted P.O.S. like Hillary that he controlled.

  • TimLong

    Total BS. Wingnuts will believe anything.

  • thatguyJMM

    It’s so adorable how you righties twist the Pew report to suit your bullshit agenda

  • HenryJ

    Fake news!

  • Shaudi Sardi

    Political science students at Columbia were taught a detailed plan designed by two former Columbia professors named Cloward and Piven to bring down “the system,” destroy capitalism, and turn America into a socialist state. We discussed it in class, wrote about it, and debated it outside class. It was a hot topic of discussion around the halls of Columbia for four years.The plan was revolting, but brilliant. Cloward and Piven taught that America could only be destroyed from within. Only by overwhelming the system with debt, welfare, and entitlements could capitalism and the America economy be destroyed. So the plan was to make a majority of Americans dependent on welfare, food stamps, disability, unemployment, and entitlements of all kinds. Then, under the weight of the debt, the system would implode and the economy collapse, bankrupting business owners (i.e. conservative donors). Americans would be brought to their knees, begging for big government to save them. Voila – you’d have a new system.

  • Henry Rearden

    Where exactly is this study? I am thankful that we aren’t referring to President Hillary; however, putting something unverifiable (false?) out there is wrong regardless of the motive behind it.

  • DoraG38

    Just as we always suspected and President Trump cited. The whole clinton thing with a rigged election was 100% right on. NPR surprised me with this, but now, maybe the rest of the liberal media will catch fire and realize Donald J. Trump is who we need to get our country back on track.

  • LJM

    This article is a pack of lies. Not one word is true

  • ken ware

    I have talked to thousands of Americans that are fed up with all the Treason that’s going on in our Country! They are wanting to fire another shot heard around the world! If the Democrats don’t stop all their Treason ,lying and fraud and screwing the American people there will be another Civil war, and that’s one thing they don’t want! A genocide in our own country! When people are willing to fight and kill or die for what’s going on it’s really serious! It will be the worse war in American History!Millions will die including a hell of a lot of politicians as the war will center around DC! I can only pray to God for his Divine Mercy from keeping this from Happening! America you can see what the politicians are doing. They were not voted in to get rich but to help the American people, not every Tom, Dick, and harry that crosses our borders illegally, which I might add is against the law in itself! The Governors of these states should be arrested along with the Mayors of cities and even the Sheriff dept. leaders! IT’S TIME FOR AMERICA TO BECOME THE LAND OF THE FREE AGAIN , ( FOR AMERICAN CITIZENS)!You had better listen to the people speaking Politicians or the Blood of Americans will not be on your hands but dripping from your bodies! It’s time to end this Obama Foolishness! We Elected President Trump because of your stupidity and I might add, without the help of the Russian Government, but your Ignorance! You had a Criminal running against Mr Trump to start with! What the Hell did you expect? We The People , (Your Bosses) have Had enough and you need to stop being babies before it’s too late! Before we let you win by crooked methods We will fight and while we do another powerful country will take America! Is that what the Democrats want? Well just keep doing what you are doing and find out! God help us from Tyranny!

  • Renee Amber Hollister

    The hilda-BITCH LOST..
    she Knows It
    and SO DO
    “WE THE PEOPLE”

  • Renee Amber Hollister

    _

    What’s really appalling
    is The voting scum, who
    Will sell their very soul
    For
    STUFF __

  • J. Nev

    Meanwhile: Thursday 12/15/16 after a 5 year investigation Obama birth certificate OFFICIALLY PROVEN FRAUD BY LAW ENFORCEMENT!!! 9 POINTS OF FORGERY…. https://www.facebook.com/sheriffjoearpaio/videos/1405398192834331/

    • E.L. Baldwin-Brown

      Fake news

  • jeremiahjoseph

    I agree that the Clintonista machine failed to steal the election, and that many, probably millions of illegal votes were cast for her. BUT your article headline is ridiculously over-the-top and misleading. NPR did NOT state what you stated. You diminish your credibility by doing this click-bait headlining. Are you too shortsighted to understand that? If so, you will find this exaggeration self-defeating.

  • Gerri Robishaw Ziegler

    We knew she was complicit with cheating in the primary but this is BULLSHIT. I can’t stand the woman but Yournewswire has just lost me as a follower. The general was fair. The bitch thought she would win. Trump and she come from the same cloth. Neither should have run for the presidency.

  • C.T. Dixon

    A fine example of fake news. The NPR report was not about fake votes cast, but about problems with the voter registration lists and was from 2012 before Hillary was on the ballot against Trump. And if you looked at it statistically and evryone of the 1.8 million dead voters and 24 million duplicate registrations had a vote cast they probably would have been cas in the same proportion as the actual vote results since I am damn sure that not all of those votes would have been for Clinton. The dead voters would have had votes most likely casr by next of kin or the current residents at the listed address and for the duplicate registrations i am sure they are distributed in the same proportions as the rest of the voting populace since both Demorats and Republigoons are equally likely to move and re-register to vote at their new residency address.

  • Broos

    As President Donald JUSTICE Trump has said.

  • dainz

    Democrat liberals are against voter ID….having to prove your identity before you can vote…..how would their illegals and dead people get to vote if they had to show ID??!!

  • Mark Choi

    First, the Pew Center said NO SUCH THING, liar.
    Second, neither did the author of the first study referenced here. In fact, Jesse Richman of Old Dominion University, who wrote the first paper, has repeatedly made a point of requesting that Trump and his surrogates, such as the sock puppet that wrote this hack piece, STOP misquoting and misusing his research.
    Third, these studies were about inaccurate voting roles, NOT fraudulent voters. Anyone claiming the contrary is either an idiot or a liar. Or both.
    Which one are you, Sean Adl-Tabatabai?

  • E.L. Baldwin-Brown

    I read through most comments on this discussion and I liked the ones that made sense to me that came from a place of rational thinking and good judgement For the ones I didn’t react to here’s why. First of all, I can’t believe that people are still talking about the election results based on this phony article up here. We all know that it’s the Electoral COllege(CONgress) who decides the election and not the popular vote. Killary as yall love to call her, definitely beat Prima Donnald by a wide margin in the popular votes. Now here’s some FACTS , not artificial or alternative and certainly not for stroking 45’s ego either. OUt of 50 states you have 28 that have laws that require their electorates to vote for who their constituents have voted for in the popular vote. Two of those states are New YOrk and my state California. The other 22 states do not have this law, which is a state law so perhaps federalizing it might have MADE the difference in this past election. So in these 22 states one being Texas and another is Florida, the electorate can legally defy the popular vote results and on their own volition choose the candidate that they want, even if their constituents voted for some one else, the majority that is. SO WHERE IS THE PEOPLE RULE AND DEMOCRACY IN THAT? NOWHERE. HE DIDN’T WIN BECAUSE HE GOT SO MUCH SUPPORT FROM PEOPLE, HE WON BECAUSE HE’S A BULLY A NARCISSISTIC ONE AT THAT WHICH IS DANGEROUS, AND IN THOSE STATES WHERE HE GOT MOST OF THE ELECTORATE SUPPORT WAS BECAUSE HE’S WEALTHY AND MEALY RAGGEDY MOUTH PUNKS LIKE PAUL RYAN are intimidated by him and what they don’t know, but secretly suspect that he did in collusion in with Vladimir Farting to win the election, but go ahead yall be proud of your new lameduck ass president Trump who has been a lameduck even before his inaugural. Hopefully that will be put in history books about him since he’s making it his mission in Office more so than making Amerikkka great again, to trash President Obama;s legacy, but much to his own unsuccess at the expense of his success and that of the US. His win was facilitated in those conversations and meetings with Trump Campaign Associates like son in law Jared, FLynn, Sessions and Schumer although he he trying to hold em before he fold em. With all this not fake news, but facts with supportive evidence, you people will still support 45 because of how much yall hated that 44 unlike 45 won his election fair and square, by the electoral and popular vote and is listed among the greatest POTUS’s and him being a mixed race Black dude doing this , just really have you folks looking beat red and butt hurt. IN my city White Nationalists and KKK members had a law protected RALLY AT OUR CAPITOL: without the white hoods and sheets covering. But they got dealt with by another group who was dressed in all black with masks and even the police didn’t get all of them , but they did enough damage to them hate groups that they won;t be having no more rallies there. See 45 can piss in yalls face and tell yall that it’s raining outside and yall would gung hoe believe him and exaggerate this unrealistic fear that he is giving yall about immigrants that work for pennies like slaves in fields so that you can have dinner on your table every evening , wash and detail your vehicles, and do your gardening , roofing, landscaping and laying the foundation of the homes your buying, that you don’t want them living next door as your neighbors because it will briNg down your property values. WELL SOUNDS LIKE TO ME TRUMP IS NOT MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN, HE’S MAKE AMERICA HATE AGAIN!!!!

    CALEXIT WOOHOO THERE’S NO MORE US IN THE US(pun INTENDED)

  • Donnie Lowe

    MILLIONS
    OF ILLEGALS VOTING ILLEGALLY ENGINEERED BY THE PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS
    and all the media are silent! Wonder Why?

    These illegals must be taken off the voting roles before the
    next election.

    In California and other communist cities and states have been
    giving illegal’s driver licenses has been a top goal of PROGRESSIVE SOCIALIST DEMOCRATS for the past 6
    years so they could vote in this past election and all the media is silent! This
    is the only reason Sanctuary cities exist and that is to allow illegal’s to
    vote for progressive socialist democrats. Dam the cost to society to house,
    feed, clothe, educate and provide health care from real citizens tax dollars.

    That means they can register to vote. It is illegal to ask if
    they reside here legally or if they are a citizen. That is why this state is
    solid democrat and in financial ruin.

    The progressives will
    try every crooked thing they can to get Senate and House to stop Trump’s
    progress! It is all about illegal’s voting illegally for communist Islamic
    socialist progressive democrats. They will get first priority on everything
    ahead of seniors and veterans! Dam the cost to the nation with the communist
    left its means is justified by end result legal or not. Write email you
    congressmen asking them to enforce current laws and put in place laws that WILL
    stop NON CITIZENS FROM VOTING! As we all know the only

  • Flick Yoli

    DNC = Jewish Oligrachy

  • Joseph Slabaugh

    “most populous countries” Throughout your article you used the word “country” in stead of “county”

  • Jusme

    Democrats struggle hard to keep their fantasy alive.
    Please do not bother them with the true facts.
    Their minds can not accept reality. It is our duty to protect these children that will always live in a bubble world of their own.

    Be sure to visit the website where Hillary is our president. It seems to help

  • http://thenewsofthefutur.blogspot.com/?m=1 Thomas Faddis

    One of the few times I can believe npr?! …Amazing!