Rhesus (RH) negative blood? You may belong to the Nephilim

Recent studies have shown that people who have rhesus (RH) negative blood may belong to the Nephilim - a parallel race to us humans.

If you have rhesus (RH) negative blood you may belong to the Nephilim – a parallel race to us humans.

Recent studies have shown that this rare blood group may indicate non-human traits in your makeup which set you apart from the conventional DNA of homo sapiens.

There is a lot of confusion about the origin of the word Nephilim and what it means. In Hebrew it literally means to fall. As in fallen angel. The Bible, the Talmud and the Koran (where they are referred to as Djinn) all speak of fallen angels.

In the Book of Genesis in the Bible it relates how the Nephilim produced children with humans. One was even depicted as killing Japheth, Noah’s son, and taking his place whereupon he fathered many children with Japheth’s unsuspecting wife which eventually populated much of Northern Europe.

Experts can’t agree about where the origin of this side order of humans may have originated, citing fallen angels (Nephilim) or aliens as possible sources, but they do agree on the characteristics which can include:

  • Higher than average IQ
  • More sensitive vision and other senses.
  • Lower body temperature
  • Higher blood pressure
  • Increased occurrence of psychic/intuitive abilities
  • Predominantly blue, green, or hazel eyes
  • Red or reddish hair
  • Increased sensitivity to heat and sunlight
  • Cannot be cloned
  • Extra vertebra

Once you have finished checking yourself over, if you are Rhesus Negative you are already very special as very few (15%) people fall within that category. It’s interesting to note that the coloring referred to in these characteristics are typical of Northern Europe – an echo of the Biblical story of Noah’s son being murdered by the Nephilim and the children produced populating Northern Europe perhaps?

But what does Rhesus Negative mean exactly? Of the human blood types, O is the most common. It is a universal blood type. Blood types are further broken down into two groups, negative and positive. This is called the RH factor. The RH factor is the Rhesus (rhesus as in monkey) blood factor.

If your blood tests positive for this, you have the factor in your blood. If you test negative, you do not have the factor in your blood.

The RH factor is a protein found in the human blood that is directly linked to the Rhesus Monkey.

When blood type is inherited from your parents, it is known that this factor element of the blood is the most consistent human or animal characteristic passed on to the off spring. There are VERY few aberrations. It rarely changes. Most people, about 85%, have RH-positive blood. That could support the idea that humans evolved or were derived from Primates. 15 % of humans have RH-negative blood.

If blood type is one of least mutable human characteristic, where did the RH negative come from? This question has puzzled scientists for years. There is some evidence that suggests the RH-negative blood group may have appeared about 35,000 years ago. And the appearance was regional and seemed to, originally, be connected with certain groups/tribes of people.

Northern Spain and Southern France is where you can find some of the highest concentration of the RH-negative factor in the Basque people. Another original group were the Eastern/Oriental Jews. In general, about 40 – 45% of Europeans have the RH-negative group. Only about 3% of African descendent and about 1% of Asian or Native American descendent has the RH-negative group. Due to the larger European numbers, it is a safe bet that was where it was introduced into the human genetic code. Could this also be where the Caucasian was introduced? Is the introduction of Caucasian related to the RH-blood factor.

This would lend credence that the RH-negative factor was introduced from an outside source. Could the source be from human like beings from another planet? Or maybe we are just as alien as they are, in that, we are a product of their manipulation and interference. Could they have come here and manipulated life forms already present on earth to create modern man?

Many ancient texts, including, the Bible, do support this theory. Many stories in the ancient texts, especially pre-Christian texts, do tell about a race that from the Heavens to the Earth Came. In the Bible,  man saw them as gods, living long lives and performing miracles. In the Book of Enoch, which never quite made it officially into the Bible as it was considered idolatrous and too concerned with the story of the angels, the Nephilim and fallen angels are referred to in detail.

The book was written by Enoch who was a very interesting and creative Biblical character. He was considered to be the same historical figure as Abraham in the Talmud. It is believed he was closely connected to Archangel Metatron, who, although he sounds more like a Power Ranger, is believed to be the highest of all the Archangels and the closest to God. Some believe he is the angel who greets you at the spiritual bridge between earth and heaven which technically makes him the Grim Reaper. In Greek mythology he is considered the equivalent of Hades who took spirits across the Styx to the Underworld.

Watch an extraordinary video about the Nephilim below and read more about your possible origins here.

This article was originally published in 2014 and is frequently updated

Simon Ludgate
Follow me

Simon Ludgate

Author presenter screenwriter director
Simon Ludgate
Follow me
  • TheDOTKU

    It’s so boring here. And ugly. I wish I woke into this world not dreading it.

  • Tony Lear

    Noah was born with white skin and blond hair with colored eyes according to the book of Enoch found in the dead sea scrolls. Enoch asked God about this and was told the child was completely human.
    Download the PDF “Book of Enoch” if you want to know how and why the Angels came, their names and crimes……………utterly fascinating read.

    • lyone

      nonsense. Enoch–nor any other biblical book– does not describe the physical characteristics of Noah.

      • benjamin

        it really does. enoch and methusaleh conversed concerning the strange look of noah as he looked not as his siblings so wisdom was sought as noahs father thought his wife unfaithful .

  • http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/337485161 David Howard

    Under secret Presidential Order, signed by President Jimmy Carter http://www.angelfire.com/ut/branton/THE_DULCE_BATTLE.htm

  • TonyaLee Miskell

    The rhesus test has nothing to do with the monkey… it was named after the chemist who pioneered the test… also Noah was recorded as having pale blue eyes and white blond hair as well as being very light skinned… see the Book of Enoch.. so if Noah was perfect in all his generations as the Bible tells us… then that totally blows you hypothesis…

    • SirTerrance Murphy

      -.” The Rhesus factor gets its name from experiments conducted in 1937 by scientists Karl Landsteiner and Alexander S. Weiner. Their experiments involved rabbits which, when injected with the Rhesus monkey’s red blood cells, produced an antigen that is present in the red blood cells of many humans.

    • Vapeman

      The Rhesus test is a Test that distinctly test the Genetic Makeup of an individual for Rhesus Monkey Genome Markers that are distinct with the Rhesus Monkey Genetics and found in around 85% of the Upright Walking Mostly Hairless Verbalizing beings on the surface of the earth. Thus one could Extrapolate 85% of the earth is covered by huMans (those that from the nephilim) , and 15% (Rh Negative) of the earth is covered by MANkind (those that are descendants of GOD’s Best Creation ever MAN).

    • Tamara

      Actually it has everything to do with the rhesus monkey, not quite sure where you are coming from saying it doesn’t as that is THE entire premise of the Rh factor.

    • urbanlover

      In 1939, Philip Levine and Rufus Stetson published in a first case report the clinical consequences of non-recognized Rh factor, hemolytic transfusion reaction and hemolytic disease of the newborn in its most severe form.[1] It was recognized that the serum of the reported woman agglutinated with red blood cells of about 80% of the people although the then known blood groups, in particular ABO were matched. No name was given to this agglutinin when described for the first time. In 1940, Karl Landsteiner and Alexander S. Wiener reported a serum that also reacted with about 85% of different human red blood cells.[2] This serum was produced by immunizing rabbits with red blood cells from Rhesus macaque. The antigen that induced this immunization was designated by them as Rh factor “to indicate that rhesus blood had been used for the production of the serum.”[3]

      Based on the serologic similarities Rh factor was later also used for antigens, and anti-Rh for antibodies, found in humans such as the previously described by Levine and Stetson. Although differences between these two sera were shown already in 1942 and clearly demonstrated in 1963, the already widely used term “Rh” was kept for the clinically described human antibodies which are different from the ones related to the Rhesus monkey. This real factor found in Rhesus macaque was classified in the Landsteiner-Wiener antigen system (antigen LW, antibody anti-LW) in honor of the discoverers.[4][5] It was recognized that the Rh factor was just one in a system of various antigens. Based on different models of genetic inheritance, two different terminologies were developed; both of them are still in use.

      The clinical significance of this highly immunizing D antigen (i.e. Rh factor) was soon realized. Some keystones were to recognize its importance for blood transfusion including reliable diagnostic tests, and hemolytic disease of the newborn including exchange transfusion and very importantly the prevention of it by screening and prophylaxis.

      The discovery of fetal cell-free DNA in maternal circulation by Holzgrieve et al. led to the noninvasive genotyping of fetal Rh genes in many countries.

      • Debbie Wareing

        So does that mean, the clinical serum or missing factor discovered by Philip Levine and Rufus Stetson, present in the human genome, is actually, nothing at all to do with the monkey after all?

        My understanding, if I’m correct, from your comments, is that the later serum reported and used by Karl Landsteiner and Alexander S. was the rhesus blood and was different (although similar) to the human antibodies.

        Basically, the monkey was used to produce a serum that had significant benefit for humans in the treatment of conditions resulting from a lack of this factor.

        Ha ha, very interesting, a topic that I didn’t really know much about, apart from +/- rhesus blood types and the agglutination when mixing the two types, particularly, in reference to a Rh – mother carrying a Rh+ baby.
        So the above comment by Sir Terrance Murphy, is not strictly correct?
        ‘Rhesus monkey’s red blood cells, produced an antigen that is present in the red blood cells of many humans.’
        Ha lol, if that is the case and (I have some faith that it is) because of the references to peer read scientific articles and the accuracy of the science. Then quite clearly, not only the author of the article, Simon Ludgate, but also, the likes of some on here! Ridiculing comments ( eg. Vapeman) should be well and truly silenced! Then there are others, who also disagreed politely with TonyaLee Miskell, when in actual fact she was absolutely right! Short and to the point put down! I like it!

        Although she did, like Simon Ludgate use a non biblical account, the book of Enoch, however, the comment about Noah being ‘perfect in all his generations’ is an accurate biblical account of Noah, who was in the ‘official’ bible considered by God to be the only blameless and righteous person walking at that time! God searched but there proved to be no other like him.

        Pft……. non human blood traits, directly linked to the rhesus monkey! Aliens! Descendents of Nephilim!

        Completely fabricated, he ought to go into ‘creative writing’

        I knew the article and probably the author was a no brainer on the grounds of using a non-biblical book, that ‘officially’ didn’t quite make it in to the bible to back up his argument, ‘an echo of the Biblical story of Noah’s son being murdered by the Nephilim and the children produced populating Northern Europe perhaps?’ As well as other inaccuracies…eg Jesus Christ is the archangel Michael and is the closest to God, as His beloved first creation!

        The man is a fool, I say! A fool! Total utter Rubbish the whole article!

        lol, seriously though, thank you very much for your insight, Urbanlover.

    • Debbie Wareing

      The book of Enoch is not part of the Holy Bible and therefore cannot be given the same standing!
      2Tim 3:16 ‘All scripture is inspired of God’ The mere fact that this book and many others do not appear in the Bible is because they don’t belong there!

      • floathouse

        The book of Enoch is ‘not part of the “Holy Bible” because the First Council of Nicaea in 325 AD under the direct supervision of the Emperor Constintine 1, did NOT vote to include it in the “canonical Gospels of the New Testament”, but they DID vote on the Divinity of Jesus Christ. And THAT passed by ONE vote. The net effect is, that the Bible and its teachings is a direct result of the Roman Catholic church deciding by vote what would and would not be included in their religiious view of events that happened three hundred years earlier. Your book is NOT Holy Writ. It is a group of various documents voted on by Roman Catholic Bishops to obtain a consensus on tenants of the Holy Mother Church. Your quoting from a questionable document is typical of folks that don’t know very much about the actual history of the religion they are so bigoted about. You probably should spend about the next 50 years reading and assimilating every religious document ever written, including those from India, and then you might have just enough glimmer of what went on 2,000 years ago to offer up an opinion on it. You have no personal information to know what Jesus said, or did not say, what God wants or doesn’t want. You are relying entirely on what a group of Catholic Bishops voted on, and they have never been known to be objective. Little things, like Oh, say the Inquisition, the Cather wars, Slavery, decimation of cultures in the Americas to name but a few.

  • Max Mills

    Wow, a lot of blatant inaccuracies here. The word “Nephilim” is not used to describe fallen angels in the Bible. It is used to describe the children who are born of the union between “bene elohim” (some think this means angels, the Book of Enoch argues so) and humans. Nephilim are the kids, not the parents. And I do not even know where you are drawing the idea that one killed and replaced Japheth. You cannot just invent things and pretend they are true for the sake of supporting your bizarre conspiracy theory.

    Also, Hades didnt ferry anybody across the river styx. Charon did that.

    Your science stuff is all ridiculous too but these points feel like enough to sink your article so I dont feel a particular drive to keep going.

    • William C. Steffen

      Interesting, how you say; “You cannot just invent things and pretend they are true for the sake of supporting your bizarre conspiracy theory.” even though you discuss the Bible, fallen angels, children of angels and humans, etc….. (all things that were made up) as though they were / are real.

      • Max Mills

        My comment is discussing what is and is not true of characters in books. Whether those characters are real and whether I believe those characters are real (I do not think Charon is real) has no impact on the point I am making.

        • Sarsar

          See the evil attacks. If you are good. I believe in fallen angels. I am rh a neg blood and godis close to me hehas spoken to me and I have dreams that happen like the here and now just as if it were real as present time. I dreamed of being on top of a red clay dirt hill next to a woman like my mother. I stomped my foit demanding she told me who was in the black huerst thatwas buried face down in griund. A voice in black distant not man or womans voice just a voice said “so n so died” I do not want to publicly say the name. Let’s just say for the voice said doe died. That morning I awoke and phone rang it was a person with the name for saying they are coing to visit the woman that was like my mother where I stayed. I told for of dream I had. That night he was murdered. Anither time for six months I dreamed of same dream each dream I woke screaming terrified not knowig what itwas in dream that scared me. 6months later I went with some friends and got list and stranded in the mountains. I ended up at an insane lunatics house that had no electricity only wood buring. Stove I was trying to hidefrom and when I backed into something and turned around I recogized the familariy of the house and everything in it. It was the same identical place I dreamed about for six months. I. Am protected by god and not harmed. I get a flat tire out of no where a person will pull up with exact tire I need and put it on my car no matter where I need help out of no where exactly what I need for help appears. I am clise to god.no body can kill me till I serve my purpise whatever it is intended by him to be.

          • Ken Plowman

            maybe you are doing these things while you are sleep walking

          • Shel New

            Dear one…I am also RH negative. I had to had Rhogam injections during my early pregnancy in 1984. My mother past away in 1965 of a heart post operative surgery. I knew she was going to die. I was 12 an only child. My mother was red headed and hazel/green eyes. I have always felt I was not from here. I watch Ancient Aliens on the History Channel hours on end. lolol….I feel so serene knowing where I came from. I am a Star Seed. I am not from Satan side of lineage. People who are afraid and do not understand their past life or where they original came from….have deep fear…do not want to believe. I know my mother past the RH negative blood line onto me in my heart as I have researching further. I have 98% of the traits. Only I do not know…if I have the extra vertebra. Other than that…I have traits. My mother’s family was Scottish/Irish. My father….American Indian Cherokee. Dark eyes and skin. Eastern Kentucky area. I also feel I was from Lemuria. I have a theory about the Lemurians after their life was destroyed. We know we were not in a psychical body, We lived in an etheric universe and communicated telepathically. Much of us of the Lemuria was destroyed we went to the Americas (United States, Central America and so forth.). Here I am now. Living among the humans in Indiana. Keeping quiet and studying my lineage through the universal archives. Know and learn your truth of who you feel you are! Don’t let others discredit your true beliefs. I have kept quiet most of my life. Now….hell no! Our history has been so bogus written to control people. Live your truth. Once I owned my truth, connect with my master teachers and guides who are on of this Earth plane. OMG…my life has become amazing. Now I create the most awesome art and music. When people come to my home…they are peaceful, serere. They wish they could be like me…I say to them…”you can!” They are so afraid to know the truth of their life’s history. Perhaps…it is not from the planet Earth. Love and Light to all on their journey.

          • cathy welchert

            i to have rhnegtive i just saw the info onhistory channel and i did back ground info at the libray i my relatives were from kentucy iam part american indian and hazal eyes wish i knew more and about my self and were my blood line came from thanks for info .

      • Vapeman

        You are clearly a human, no ability to contemplate, you are just rash emotionally driven hairless monkey that speaks.

        • Mike Kelley

          meat can sing too….

          • Ava Evita

            and dance

      • Debbie Wareing

        Also interesting that you make the arrogant assumption that the Bible is ‘all things that were made up’! What qualifies you to make such a statement and what evidence do you base it on? The comment only goes to prove that you do in fact invent things to support your theory! Show me real tangible evidence that all things in the bible are made up! From my knowledge and understanding the Bible holds up to be an accurate historical account of human history and fulfilment of prophecy no scientist/historian/theologian/philosopher to date has been able to provide any evidence to the contrary! Granted all things in the Bible may not seem believable to man and man may not always have the correct understanding of the scriptures, but that does not mean that they aren’t true or that they are made up! As the Bible quite clearly states in Jeramiah 10:23…..’that man’s way does not belong to him. It does not belong to man who is walking even to direct his step’

        • Mike Kelley

          good luck with that accurate account and fulfilling prophecy stuff….

        • Daniel Eggeman

          Lol. I hope this is meant as satire and buffoonery.

          • Debbie Wareing

            haha…lol…I can see why you said that and to be honest, in the first instance, it was his arrogance that got me on one! I do not like flippant remarks that have no substance! I remain contrite, although I suppose, maybe I was a touch frivolous!
            Not so much buffoonery however, I do actually hold the bible in high esteem. The bible has been translated, in whole or in part, into about 2,600 languages. It is by far the most widely translated and distributed book in history. Despite many corrupt religious leaders trying to withhold it, from the common man and all the unbelievers or non Christian efforts to destroy it! Not least the Roman government!

            The Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete manuscript dating 1008/9 C.E. However, the Dead Sea Scrolls contain about 220 biblical manuscripts or fragments that have been dated more than a thousand years older than the Leningrad codex. Despite the manuscripts, in the scrolls, having some variation in wording the message itself, was the same as the Bible today. One scholar stated

            “It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted. Another Bible scholar wrote

            “The evidence for our New Testament writings is ever so much greater than the evidence for many writings of classical authors, the authenticity of which no one dreams of questioning” He also said

            “If the New Testament were a collection of secular writings, their authenticity would generally be regarded, as beyond all doubt.”

            The Author and Originator of the Bible, I believe is also its Preserver.
            He is the One who caused this statement to be recorded: (Isa 40:8)
            “The word of our God endures forever”

            And so you see not total buffoonery!

          • Alec Gonzalez

            I am all for a person having faith, Man should have faith. However, the ignorant nonsense you spew here is a direct indictment of religion. NOTHING you posted is supported by fact. Science has regularly proven the bible inaccurate. The book itself is best read as allegory, and even then it is best to remember it was a socio-political tool when it was written. As for the dead sea scrolls, half of those contradict the other half and the bible as well. The distribution of a work, especially one that was carried by hostile conquerors who literally committed murder in order to ensure it’s predominance, is in no way a measure of it’s accuracy. In closing, all of your remarks are flippant and contain no real substance. Religion truly is the opium of the masses, it numbs the mind and destroys the person.

          • Debbie Wareing

            I am interested to know what and when you believe that science has proved the bible as inaccurate? I am also interested in why you consider what I posted as ignorant spew. I clearly referenced my sources.
            As for your comment about the Dead Sea scrolls…yes clearly there were spurious manuscripts that claimed to be biblical writings however, if one has actually read and studied the bible it is evident that certain manuscripts directly contradict the bible with idolatrous worship, magical divination

          • Maria

            Touché. Well said. fantastic, could not have conveyed it better, if I’d wrote this myself! The epitome of human reasoning. Without dumb prejudice.

          • Jacqueline Balodis

            Read creation magazines or their website and Bible archeology and their website you’ll find how science and archeological finds are providing the Bible

        • Maria

          The Bible was an invention, a story told. You brainwashed fool. Ha ha. The only thing that is real is nature…

          • Debbie Wareing

            How arrogant!

          • Smawt

            The Bible isn’t “A” story. It’s “A” Biblical. “A” Library. A collection of spiritually motivated accounts, records, foreshadowings etc by MANY authors over a period of MANY years. Fool is one who speaks without knowledge professing to have some and doing not much more than entertaining, like one that falls down trying to walk with her shoes on the wrong feet… “Maria”

        • scumby

          Luke 21:25 has proved to be true. The sun changed from yellow to white. The stars move back and forth.

          • Debbie Wareing

            All will prove to be true…in Gods time…according to that hour no one knows…He comes as a thief in the night!

        • scumby

          the small t has changed -no longer seen as a cross. The a has changed too.

    • Eileen Negron

      All very interesting. Can you provide more insight? I would be interested to read about it. 🙂

      • stoppuppymills

        I love your photo.

    • Brandon Harrison

      I agree, the nephilim where the offspring of human women and “the sons of god” in genesis. Literally bene Elohim means sons of godly beings. In kabbalah there are 10 levels of being, from man to god. Men(more accurately, manlike beings) are called ashim, then above them are the kerubim( called the strong ones, most likely the same as the nephilim, described as giants in some esoteric texts, other directly contradict this though) above them are bene Elohim, then Elohim, then malakim(messengers) then seraphim(burning ones, serpents) then hashmallim(the shining/glowing ones) then erelim(brave ones) then ophanim(wheels) then hayot ha kodesh which are “the holy living ones” the only one above them is the godhead, which can’t technically be described as living as we know it.

      • The neg family

        It’s only bizarre to you because you just don’t care to elaborate and possibly jealous you can’t come up with other theories besides the ones already told.

        • charlieweird

          no its called a correction of errors .. as a student of Jewish mysticism.. I can assure you what he says is true… the author is the one fabricating shit out of whole cloth… pity you want to believe lies because it pleases you somehow… judging from your screen name, you probably think you’re special… because of this load of horsecrap.

          • Claire Smartlady

            “a student of Jewish mysticism.” Synagogue of Satan, yes we ALL know about you. LOLLLLL

        • Bill Nada

          Yeah! Make up your own BS!

      • Rado

        Modern Kabbalah interpretation is transgressed into spiritism and Buddha-based religions that accept reincarnation: they say that humans, in succesive reincarnations, reach a god-like state ( with prior 9 levels or degrees of spiritual embelishment trough every day living suffering) being transformed in angels, thus not being obliged to reincarnation. However, this science is false and is Fallen Angels deceit. Jesus and God (in Book of Enoch) clearly states that humans are ment to live once and eventually die, no matter what.

        So give me a break with this Kabbalah crap!! People who eat and shit on a regular basis cannot reach a God-like position.

        Ancient knowledge? Don’t worry: Days of end should be like days of Noah. In pre-flood times, people would have iPhones, flying devices, music stars like Rhianna, and even television, but they didn’t know how to read and write (because they lived too long to ever need to transpose knowledge). Even with that progress (which was bigger than our, due to Fallen Angels) they couldn’t avoid death (in order to gain eternal living) and God’s wrath!

        So what do you think? Is this Kabbalah futile for the mankind?

        With Consideration and respects,

        R. I.

        • Claire Smartlady

          “Kabbalah crap!!” Correct! Jews are Synagogue of Satan, cursed and damned, God told them, “Esau I have hated.” Jews are damned. They LOVE their witchcraft, magic, satanism, Oy Vey LOL

          • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

            You don’t know your Bible very well, do you? That out-of-context quote you made wasn’t even referring to the Jews.

            Malachi 1 (1) A prophecy: The word of the Lord to Israel through Malachi. Israel Doubts God’s Love (2) “I have loved you,” says the Lord. “But you ask, ‘How have you loved us?’ “Was not Esau Jacob’s brother?” declares the Lord. “Yet I have loved Jacob, (3) but Esau I have hated, and I have turned his hill country into a wasteland and left his inheritance to the desert jackals.” (4) Edom may say, “Though we have been crushed, we will rebuild the ruins.”

            Esau was supposedly the father of the Edomites, his brother Jacob was father of the Israelites. Go back to your anti-semitic, racists craziness.

    • Dharma

      I’m O neg and I interpreted him as saying i’m a hybrid that’s going to a dark place when i pass. Whaattt????? had a panic attack after…

    • chosen

      You Sounds like a monkey talkin to me

    • Domfincrag Gaming

      I was actually looking for a serious article and came across this nonsense. The ethnic group with the highest rate of rh neg blood are the basque of the Spanish-FrenshPyrenees,not so much the northern europeans.

    • Bingo/Bingo

      Very simple, all these so called studies about RACE that are always published by these so called European and North American scientific magazines are JUST a Western version of the DAESH magazine of ISS which is always trying so hard to brain washed people that ISLAM is the chosen one by GOD.

    • Smitty Werben Jaegerman Jansen

      The Nephilim were NOT the children, they were the ‘cloud dwellers’ that mated with the human women. Learn to read.

    • Michael Gunslinger

      Max you have been down a really dark road and your facts are incorrect. Nephilim in the Biblical term is referencing giants. Goliath thought to be one himself. I suggest you study and learn the Cuneiform texts. at least 3000 years older than any biblical hand me down stories and the truth to human origins. 300,000 BCE: ETS ADDED ERECTUS GENES TO NIBIRAN GENOME FOR ADAM & EVE-ANUNNAKI TABLETS, Written over 5000 years ago they explain in detail gene splicing and DNA…

      • Michael Gunslinger

        By the way many of the artifacts supporting this where indeed some of the very first things destroyed when we invaded Baghdad. Coincidence? Not hardly.

  • Vapeman

    Um no, try the reverse you silly fool. RH Negative are the TRUE Children. We are Each Unique, and Each different, Each a True Descendant of the Creation of GOD. That is why we can not be “cloned” and have the innate abilities and intelligence we do.

  • Tamara

    Rh- did not appear here 35,000 years ago. It is simply the oldest bloodlines from the first inhabitants of Earth, that didn’t have their genetics mixed with that of the ape. The stories that Rh- people are “aliens” is astral based in origin and nothing but disinformation. Sure, in this day and age, all of us have genetics from multiple star systems however, when it comes to the BLOOD line, Rh- is the only remnants left of those not messed with by Enki and Enlil.

  • The Pork

    Well that would explain a lot! coming from a neg blood line, however the negs are in abundance in Europe, when I was a kid in the UK it was about 50/50!!!

    • Lucia

      The world chart states 17% for the UK, mind you worldwide it’s 7,5 % of the population.

  • Linda Stadstad

    This is bullshit. Those with rh neg blood are pure bloods. Which I believe are descendants of Jesus and Mary Magdeline.

    • Shells

      I’m Rh Neg

      • code4blue

        As am I, two markers one from each parent, active HH.

    • Debbie Wareing

      I assume from that statement you are rh neg! What makes you think that Christ would have had relations with Mary Magdeline or any other woman for that matter. That would be a total contradiction of His teachings! Do not fornicate!!

      • Matt Matt

        Where did Jesus say “no not fornicate”?

        • Debbie Wareing

          There are a number of scriptures in the new testament that indicates sexual immorality to be unclean, to abstain from, neither let us practice etc.

          Matthew 15:19 Jesus says that sexual immorality defiles a man.

          Acts 15:20 says ‘to abstain from sexual immorality.’

          1Corinthians 10:8 says ‘neither let us practice sexual immorality’.

          Galatians 5:19 says ‘now the works of the flesh are plainly seen and they are sexual immorality, unclean brazen conduct.’

          Ephesians 5:3 ‘Let sexual immorality and every sort of uncleanness or greediness not even be mentioned among you.’

          1Thessalonians 4:3 ‘For this is the will of God that you should be holy and abstain from sexual immorality.’

          The translation of ‘sexual immorality’ in these scriptures is from the Greek word ‘porneia’, which is a general term for all unlawful sexual intercourse. It includes adultery, prostitution, sexual relations between unmarried individuals, homosexuality and bestiality. This of course is unlawful in the eyes of God, man made laws of course vary from country to country and maybe some laws of man do not acknowledge them all, as unlawful.

          • Matt Matt

            I asked you to say when/where did Jesus say “do not fornicate”. Not only have you failed to give me any direct quotes/sources to support this claim but the other bible quotes you have given are vague, indirect and while open to interpretation there is no basis for assuming that fornication is prohibited. Are you just another religious person who jumps to baseless assumptions regarding bible text’s and tries to pass off their own, often baseless, interpretations as gospel? There is certainly no basis for your claims regarding Jesus’ teachings as he said nothing that could be linked to your claim. But even general bible quotes fail to support your claim

          • Debbie Wareing

            Firstly, I did not say that Jesus said ‘do not fornicate’ What I said was – ‘What makes you think that Christ would have had relations with Mary Magdeline or any other woman for that matter. That would be a total contradiction of His teachings! Do not fornicate!! (these are my words, they are not punctuated as speech or a quote). I was expressing the meaning of Jesus’ teachings.
            Secondly, how can you possibly say that: 1Thessalonians 4:3
            ‘For this is the will of God that you should be holy and abstain from sexual immorality.’
            is in any way vague or indirect? It’s pretty clear to me. Perhaps a different bible version with surrounding verses and context might help clear the fog.
            The apostle Paul’s letter to the new congregation of first century Christian’s in Thessalonica. As a new congregation the apostle Paul wrote to them because he knew the people had been exposed to errant teaching from those in opposition to the way of Jesus Christ. He was in fear that false teachers might have infiltrated their number and so his letter was to encourage and motivate them with regard to their firm hope of Jesus Christ’s ultimate return.
            (NIV) 1Th4:1-5
            ‘Finally, brothers, we instructed you how to live in order to please God, as in fact you are living. Now we ask you and urge you in the Lord Jesus to do this more and more. For you know what instructions we gave you by the authority of the Lord Jesus. It is God’s will that you should be sanctified: that you should avoid sexual immorality; that each of you should learn to control his own body in a way that is holy and honourable, not in passionate lust like the heathen, who do not know God;’

            That conveys a very clear and direct meaning with regard to Jesus’ teachings and the will of God.

            Furthermore with regard to your comment and I quote
            ‘There is certainly no basis for your claims regarding Jesus’ teachings as he said nothing that could be linked to your claim’
            On the contrary!
            (NIV) Matthew 15:1-20 (for context and clarity) Jesus answers questions from the Pharisees and then he explains the meaning to his disciples.
            ‘1 Then some Pharisees and teachers of the law came to Jesus from Jerusalem and asked, 2 “Why do your disciples break the tradition of the elders? They don’t wash their hands before they eat!” 3 Jesus replied, “And why do you break the command of God for the sake of your tradition? 4 For God said, ‘Honor your father and mother’ and ‘Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.’ 5 But you say that if a man says to his father or mother, ‘Whatever help you might otherwise have received from me is a gift devoted to God,’ 6 he is not to ‘honor his father ‘ with it. Thus you nullify the word of God for the sake of your tradition. 7 You hypocrites! Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you: 8 ” ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me. 9 They worship me in vain; their teachings are but rules taught by men. 10 Jesus called the crowd to him and said, “Listen and understand.11 What goes into a man’s mouth does not make him ‘unclean,’ but what comes out of his mouth, that is what makes him ‘unclean.’ “12 Then the disciples came to him and asked, “Do you know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this?” 13 He replied, “Every plant that my heavenly Father has not planted will be pulled up by the roots.14 Leave them; they are blind guides. If a blind man leads a blind man, both will fall into a pit.”15 Peter said, “Explain the parable to us.” 16 “Are you still so dull?” Jesus asked them. 17 “Don’t you see that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and then out of the body? 18 But the things that come out of the mouth come from the heart, and these make a man ‘unclean.’ 19 For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.20 These are what make a man ‘unclean’; but eating with unwashed hands does not make him ‘unclean.’ ”

            As this is Jesus speaking directly, one must intelligently interpret the deed of sexual immorality or fornication (sexual relations outside of marriage) as unclean, in the eyes of Jesus and the will of his Father. Other translations also term sexual immorality as unholy and evil. In addition there are many scriptures that express a very high view of marriage and parallels it to the relationship between God and his faithful followers, such as Ep 5:25-33, Mt 19:4-6, 1Co 7:1-16, Col 3:18-19, He 13:4-7, Mr 10:6-9, and Mt 22 and many more. Not to mention the many scriptures that refers to those committing sexual immorality not entering the Kingdom of God.
            And incidentally, I do not belong to any religious order and neither do I practice any form or organised religion! I merely have an interest in the bible! And I would never try to pass off my views, as gospel!
            I therefore suggest that it is, in fact yourself, who jumps to baseless assumptions!

          • Matt Matt

            Ok you didn’t put actual quotations around “do not fornicate” but your sentence was pretty clear that you were claiming this to be Jesus’ teachings. As for your question as to why I call the “evidence” you gave as vague, 1) sexual immorality is not defined 2) Jesus’ teachings were no always consistent with the rest of the bible, so other bible quotes are not overly relevant (and failed to be as specific as you claim or assume anyway) 3) Sex with in a married couple (or the equivalent for those times, as marriage did not exist in the form it does today) was not prohibited by the bible or Jesus, quite the opposite in fact so Jesus procreating with Mary Magdalene would in no way contradict his teachings, or even the general teachings of the bible.
            Your dismissal of the idea that Jesus would procreate with a woman or take a woman as a partner have no basis outside of your clearly biased and very presumptuous assumptions. Neither Jesus or the bible outlawed such a thing. And your definition of sexual immorality is exactly that, YOUR DEFINITION. And even if your definition was accurate it does not include procreation, which is the one (and apparently only) form of sex the bible does condone.
            So not only have you given no basis for the claim that Jesus’ teachings prohibited fornication but in any case the procreative sex implied by him fathering a child is perfectly in keeping with the bible. I’m not saying he did father a child, I am just saying your rationale for claiming that he wouldn’t is baseless, senseless and in my opinion rooted purely in your own bias preconception

          • Debbie Wareing

            Perhaps you ought to check the dictionary on the meaning of fornication and sexual immorality! Maybe then you might a) realise that it is not actually MY DEFINITION and b) actually get a sense of the point I am making!
            I did not say sex was prohibited, I was referring to sexual immorality or fornication which is sex OUTSIDE of a marriage!
            I accept that the Old Testament had the Mosaic law when God was involved with his people. The law was to protect them, mainly, I sense from idolatry, but also, as you say the times were different then and monogamy was not standard and it was at that time permitted to takes more than one wife. However, that was a temporary provision, as God always intended it to be, one man, one wife, when he instigated the first marriage in the Garden of Eden. (Gen 2:23-24) Then the man said: “This is at last bone of my bones, And flesh of my flesh. This one will be called Woman because from man she was taken. That is why a man will leave his father and his mother and he will stick to his wife.”
            Furthermore, Jesus ended the old Mosaic law (Ro 10:4) and gave the Christians in the New Testament, a new law, (Mr 12:30-31 “And you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your strength. The second is this, ‘you shall love your neighbour as yourself.’ There is no other commandment greater than these.”

            Jesus was not prohibited from sex or fathering a child but it would have had to be in the holy sanctimony of a married union.
            He would not have condemn the Pharisees as hypocrites and then go against his own words and commit ‘evil thoughts’ of sexual immorality!

            To have had sexual relations with any female or fathered a child, he would have married first!
            Had Jesus taken a wife, then yes, fine, sex and the fathering of a child would have been perfectly acceptable in God’s eyes. However that was not the case Jesus made it clear that he was on Earth to do God’s Will and that the taking of a wife would be a distraction.

            Jesus gave up his perfect life and was without sin! To redeem mankind and pay a ransom sacrifice for the original sin of Adam, that the whole of mankind inherited.

            For the wages sin pays is death, but the gift of God gives everlasting life by Christ Jesus our Lord. (Ro 6:23) but Jesus was not born of Adam, rather he was born of Mary, in the line of David, an immaculate conception! Therefore, he did not inherit Adam’s sin. He was born perfect and sinless and neither did he sin during his life on Earth. That is why his sacrifice not only gained God’s approval and restored man’s standing with God, but also redeems mankind, that he might live forever.
            Through Jesus Christ our saviour, man now has an opportunity to seek God’s Kingdom and survive the end of this system!

            Thy Kingdom come!
            Thy Will, be done!

          • Matt Matt

            You do realise the dictionary was written after the bible? So its definition of sexual immorality is not overly relevant.
            But we seem to be making some progress as you now admit that Jesus could have fathered a child if he was married. So why are you so certain he did not marry?
            There is a relatively popular theory that Jesus took Mary Magdalene as his partner and wife. Your original comment stated that this would have been against his teachings of do not fornicate, which are now changing to simply saying he did not marry. But how can you be so certain he did not marry?
            My point is that your beliefs are full of baseless assumptions. No where does Jesus say people cannot have sex, even outside of wedlock, but even if he did, the claim that he may have fathered a child with Mary Magdalene, who he took as his wife, cannot be refuted in any definitive way. You may find it unbelievable based on your preconceived ideas of Jesus, but such assumptions have not basis and much of what you claim about Jesus, his life and his teachings is nothing but assumptions based on virtually nothing.
            This is my problem with religious people like yourself. You have no real evidence to support your belief yet you claim that such beliefs are facts, when they are not even well supported theories.
            You still have failed to provide any evidence for your ideas about Jesus’ teachings and now you are making other claims that also has no basis, claiming that Jesus would not or could not marry has no basis.

          • Debbie Wareing

            My original statement still stands!

            My belief’s are not assumptions, they are based on the Bible, which is the only source of Jesus’ ministry and teachings, with any detail or credibility! There are some secular manuscripts confirming that a man called Jesus, who claimed to be the son of God and performed some miraculous deeds, did in fact exist. There are also some writings that make reference to his death and resurrection, however, the secular accounts are very sparse and limited in detail.

            You do not accept the Bible as a source of evidence, you also state that I have made up the definition of sexual immorality, because the dictionary is also not an acceptable source of definitions.
            Yet, you assume to have some sort of knowledge of Jesus’ life, that differs from the majority of other believers such as theologians, religious groups and denominations, bible scholar’s and many other intellects, even scientists!

            So please tell…..what it is, that you base your ideas upon?

            As there is absolutely no evidence or proof, in any manuscripts, reports or writings of that time, in fact not even a shred or fragment has been found that says Jesus took a wife, married, had sexual relations or fathered a child…

            I assume that your comments about Jesus and Mary Magdalene, are based on something other than your own biased and baseless assumptions?

            Oh yes, sorry it’s because….
            ‘There is a relatively popular theory’

            Hmm…interesting….so your opinions are based on rumour, idle gossip and speculation!

            Whilst mine are based on The bible which has been translated, in whole or in part, into about 2,600 languages. It is by far the most widely translated and distributed book in history. Despite many corrupt religious leaders trying to withhold it, from the common man and all the unbelievers or non Christian efforts to destroy it! Not least the Roman government!

            The Leningrad Codex is the oldest complete manuscript dating 1008/9 C.E. However, the Dead Sea Scrolls contain about 220 biblical manuscripts or fragments that have been dated more than a thousand years older than the Leningrad codex. Despite the manuscripts, in the scrolls, having some variation in wording the message itself, was the same as the Bible today. One scholar stated

            “It may be safely said that no other work of antiquity has been so accurately transmitted. Another Bible scholar wrote

            “The evidence for our New Testament writings is ever so much greater than the evidence for many writings of classical authors, the authenticity of which no one dreams of questioning” He also said

            “If the New Testament were a collection of secular writings, their authenticity would generally be regarded, as beyond all doubt.”

            So even though you most likely don’t even believe the ‘Jesus and Mary Magdalene gossip,’…. your attempt at ridiculing me due to your prejudiced generalisation of… as you say

            ‘religious people like yourself’

            has not worked in the least and because of your obvious discriminatory attack, you have shown yourself to be, without substance and rather ‘fickle’

          • Matt Matt

            Unlike you I am not pretending to know whether or not Jesus was married. I was simply saying that your claims that he wasn’t and that such a thing would somehow contradicted his teachings were seemingly based on nothing but assumptions and presumptions about his teachings and the bible teachings that didn’t seem to even support your claim.
            I am not trying to ridicule you I was just asking if your claims had any basis. One way or another I got my answer.
            I haven’t made any claims about Jesus. I wasn’t saying he did father a child, I was just saying there was no known reason why he would not have. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. If you do not believe Jesus did father a child then that is fine, I have no belief either way on this as there is not sufficient evidence of either the claim that he did or the claim that he didn’t.

          • Debbie Wareing

            I am not pretending to know, I am merely pointing out that the teachings of Jesus Christ from the Bible’s account of his ministry, is that sex outside of marriage (sexual immorality and fornication) is considered…. ‘unholy, unclean, treacherous, vile, disgusting, dishonourable and yes “a sin.” Hence the term for unmarried couples living together, as ‘living in sin!’

            Jesus Christ had the same gift of ‘free will’ that all mankind received.

            I never said that it wasn’t possible for him to have sexual relations or father a child. I said it goes against his teachings and it would render his death and ransom sacrifice, as null and void!

            If he had! and a big IF… Jesus had committed fornication or fathered a child, outside of marriage, (outside being the operative word here), then his death would not have been as a ‘sinless and perfect’ human. The ransom was to pay back man’s sin and vindicate Almighty God against the original lie…

            “That no man possessing free will, would worship God until death, without being tempted into sin.” (Not an actual quote, but the generally accepted understanding, within most religious organisations).

            I am certain that if there was any shred of evidence, what so ever, of Jesus Christ having sinned or fallen short of the ransom sacrifice. Some glorifying, non believer would, without a doubt, ensure the whole world knew about it! It would be plastered over all the national and international news and media!
            It would be the collapse of religion, as the whole of Christendom bases their faith on the sacrifice of Jesus Christ and God’s Kingdom. The whole message of the Bible from start to finish is about the forthcoming ‘seed’ that would be a ransom sacrifice that paid back man’s sin, so that we (mankind) might all be saved. It’s what every Christian prayer’s for, life under God’s rule.

            “Our Father, which art in heaven,
            Hallowed be thy Name.
            Thy Kingdom come.
            Thy will be done in earth,
            As it is in heaven.”

            And so you see, my point being that religion as we know it, would not exist if there were offspring of Mary Magdalene and Jesus running about. Unless of course, there was a wedding first!

          • Tony Donaldson

            Matt has watched the DiVinci Code one too many times.

          • Debbie Wareing

            Quite possible Tony, or maybe he enjoys gossip and tickle tackle, lol. Or maybe he just likes a good argument/debate! Somehow though, I think it’s more likely because of his lack of knowledge and understanding of the bible and his view that all ‘religious’ people base their belief on ‘faith’ alone. He does not appear to accept that some people have actually read the bible and carried out research on the validity of the gospel accounts of Jesus’ life and ministry. Or that they have also carried out research on old testament accounts that refer to historical facts, such as the rise and fall of various world powers. Or, that they might have studied the accounts that claim to relay prophetic events apparently, well in advance of their actual fulfilment and researched the accuracy of the copying and translation of the manuscripts available and the age and dates they were written. It is quite staggering to read the prophecy in the book of Daniel that relays the events surrounding the fall of the Babylonian Empire by Cyrus the Great in 539 BC.
            It is through study and the acquiring of knowledge that some people base their belief and in time develop a faith. I personally do not attend any religious organisation or profess any particular denomination. I have however, come to a understanding and respect for the Bible and now believe that it truly is the Word of God, even though I do not follow or practice any type of worship.
            I do not think it is a good idea to generalise and assume that all ‘religious’ people have blind faith!
            Anyway, it was an interesting and lively discussion, lol, and I think Matt still thinks I am a religious nut, with made up, ‘baseless’ belief’s, haha. I am sure he has not changed his view in any way, shape or form and he still considers me to be completely bonkers!
            Thanks for your comment though, it did actually make me smile.

          • Tony Donaldson

            You’re welcome Debbie. I work on the oceans and have plenty of time to read in the off watch. I’ve read John Bunyan’s, The Pilgrim’s Progress. That was a great read with lots of wisdom. I’ve read just about everything I can find by C.S. Lewis as well. I have the Geneva Bible and a Cepher that I carry with me and study. The book of Enoch was one I wish had been added to the bible. You’ll find arguments among the best of Biblical scholars. The best thing is for me to know in my heart and believe with my soul that there is a God who made his appearance for a brief time here on earth to save men from themselves. We have to remember that we have his will to do and not our own. My way never works as good as his way. I’ll stick with his way.

          • Maria

            What a brainwashed fool! The bible was a work of FICTION, in it’s time, to control the masses I concede, ingenious and fabulous still, 2000 plus yrs later. We’re still dealing with the fallout??????

          • Debbie Wareing

            Really?? Quite a sweeping statement…based on what? If you have a point to make…back it up with some evidence…I’m afraid, just cos you say so doesn’t cut it! There are many educated people scientists, theologians, historians, secular writers of that time, that do not have such ignorant arrogance to blatantly call it fiction! It is quite clear that you are not familiar with backing up your statements with any evidence or even creditable references….it would appear to be…well I think this and so be it! Get educated!

          • Bigblacksock

            something tells me you will be dealing with the “fallout” for a long time to come.

          • stoppuppymills

            It is NOT the only source of Jesus’s teaching. It is what your church leaders would have you believe.

          • stoppuppymills

            “They” are closed minded. And are the real danger not the Nephilim who said “You can be as Gods”.

          • charlieweird

            Also studying Jewish custom from the time… and interpreting the NT through that lens, makes it pretty clear that Jesus probably did indeed wed Mary Magdalene .. the wedding at Cana for instance was probably JCs wedding.. the bridegroom is responsible for supplying the wine, and when taking a wife the son casts off the mother… Jesus at 30 would have reached the age of finishing your study and becoming Rabbi, a Rabbi would have been expected to marry…
            there are other indicators in the NT .. but seriously it was probably sanitized for a gentile audience? As most of the first Christians were.. but good observations on your part as well//

          • victorshengli
          • stoppuppymills

            So all the poor humans that worship your god that didn’t get married for whatever reason can’t enjoy the god given gift of sex. What of your catholic priest?

          • Debbie Wareing

            I am not catholic and I do not believe Catholism follows biblical teachings, neither do most religious organisations!

          • stoppuppymills

            Thats the christain religion for you.

          • stoppuppymills

            It ALWAYS goes back to sex, doesn’t it.

          • Smawt

            Surely Matt, you can find Google yourself. No one has to PROVE to you that the Bible references “Fornication” as a sin in numerous places — however here are some SPECIFICALLY using the word you’re desperate to see not printed and not VAGUE…

            1 Corinthians 6:18 King James Version (KJV)

            18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

            And 20+ MORE …


          • lyone

            How do you know that Jesus defines “sexual immorality” in the same way that your pastor does?

          • Debbie Wareing

            I do not have a pastor or priest or vicar! If you read the numerous bible scriptures relating to sexual immorality it is evident that sex outside of marriage is a sin!

          • stoppuppymills

            Why would your god give humans sexual feelings if you weren’t allowed to enjoy them?

          • Debbie Wareing

            When God created the man in his image, in God’s i

      • stoppuppymills

        I never understood christains.

      • Ken Plowman

        have you ever heard the alternative story to the crucifixion and ascension? Remember that the family was able to get Jesus w/o the roman soldier breaking his legs, as was the custom , Jesus was not dead! He was taken to his tomb, and that evening either through treachery or deceit the roman soldiers admit that while they slept the stone was rolled away, Jesus was gone, he was taken by the disciples to a safe place and quickly he and Mary were secreted off to Southern France. { This is where the Basques are found} It is believed that Jesus continued to do miracles and he and Magdalene had several children while they were living there. These children are believed to be the descendants of the offspring of Jesus and Mary. Which is how this large population of rh negatives came to be, I am an ancient rh negative …..AB neg. the lowest percentage found on the planet , less than one percent of the worlds population shares my blood. therefor we are the oldest among the negs.

    • Lucia

      The RH- was already on earth before christ walked here, actually it seems that there are differences in RH- the O’s being the pure bloods and the others more or less pure blood mixed whit human in different degrees . After reading a lot of this RH – pseudo-science theories i incidentally stumbled upon a possibility of the shining ones (being non-annunaki by the way, also a fact mistakenly interpreted by self proclaimed internet experts) partly responsible for the eldest portion of RH negs and therefore the O- .Furthermore al this blood type shit isn’t changing your character or the world, the last thing we humans need now, is yet another feature to set us apart from our fellow man , we already did it with colour ,only brought us misery so stop this stupid stereotyping

      • stoppuppymills

        But we negs are different.

        • Lucia

          For the survival of humanity as a species it’s more important to look at what binds us than what seperates us.We are all special in our own ways be you greeneyed ,blond haired . dark skinned ,scandinavian or….it just doesn’t say anything of substance what’s in your heart that’s what really matters.

          • stoppuppymills

            Humanity IS the problem. Their Hearts are broken.

          • Lucia

            Humanity has been messed with seriously since their existence in every way possible by their leaders be they political or religious, by the financial institutions . They were kept in the dark about everything, were barely able to make a living, had no time to contemplate things or think them through and by the way, it most of the time was also very dangerous to do so. I come from a very old lineage, the whole nephilim thing linked to the RH negative is, to what i have dug up, totally bogus. The RH negs are related to the shining ones at least what i researched seemed to prove that and by the way the shining ones were not the Annunaki either . From your comments you seem to be a tad bit different and there is nothing wrong with that . Here on Earth different means being shunned but as i discovered some of those who are your most fanatic prosecuters, are very different too, only they are cowards and don’t dare to present themselve as such. So be your proud warrior and don’t give up so easily on humanity they might surprise you some day… they just might need a time out from all the negativity and so do you, i think you are greater than that.

          • Каждыйизнас Я

            who are the shining ones?

          • Lucia

            The shining ones i speak of are from the celtic myths, they are being spoken of as, in between high nobility and demi-gods. I am paranormally gifted and from old european descend/old blood, we know things. I have had some sort of bond with the shining ones, i believe they protected me when i was a child and maybe they still do, I can not go into it further i only know for certain that they exist in some realm and to me they represented themselves as kind and noble.

          • Debbie Wareing

            Well said…God does not give up on humanity! We are His creation, His children and He promises that the meek will possess the Earth And they will find exquisite delight in the abundance of peace (Ps 37:11). He also states that “broad is the gate and spacious is the road leading off into destruction and many are going through it; whereas narrow is the gate leading off into life and few are finding it.” ( Mt 7:13,14). God does not give up on humanity, He sent His only begotten son as a ransom sacrifice that we (mankind) might be saved.

          • Debbie Wareing

            I agree…it does not matter your eye, hair or skin colour! It is what is truly in your heart!

        • Ken Plowman

          what’s up my Negga

        • Miss Jo

          I am also an Rh negative – blood type is AB negative, which is very rare in itself. I do have all characteristics of what is said of Rh negative humans, including an extra vertebrae, reddish- brown hair, very green eyes (hunter-green shade), above-average IQ and all other characteristics listed in a few articles I’ve read. I am open to learning…if people think Earthlings are the only intelligent life forms in the Universe, I differ.

          • Christian Thomas

            You sound like my kinda gal. 🙂

      • Ken Plowman

        actually O is the universal mix and the A , B , and AB are the pure forms O is for Offspring

    • stoppuppymills

      Who are Nephilim.

  • Frances Leader

    here. I am O Rhesus Negative & not impressed with all this hoo-ha
    about my blood group. I just figure it comes from a type of primate
    which has long since become extinct. There is absolutely no evidence for
    nephilim, angels, aliens or fairies having sex with any of my
    ancestors! The very idea of calling us different or special is
    dangerous. It can result in superiority (if you are silly enough to
    believe it) or prejudice (if others believe you THINK you are superior).
    Not good.

    • Rose

      Consider something potentially more dangerous—when others believe they’re superior to you but you don’t believe you’re superior to them. That could have serious consequences for you.

    • Debbie Wareing

      A very wise woman also

    • DragonflyUtopia

      Yes, the whole post screams WHITE SUPERIORITY. Because we all know that white people are the so special- the chosen ones, ugh!

      • stoppuppymills

        Thats what you think. You should be me. Everyone hates me. Now I know why. I AM NEPHILIM!

        • mary dyer

          white superiority, Nephilim means being mistreated your whole life, being gassed, whored out, and threatened at every turn. with people threatening to burn the witch, who is and will always be marked by the father, and the son of God,the Christ, who created all beings, white superiority means, being bound and in chains, having your face deformed, and your growth stunted by injections so that you can never outrun, out think, overtake anyone, it means never being allowed to live a Godly and holy life. no choice. It means that people think that because your different, they have the right to take away any freedoms, rights, dignity, or respect because your different. it means that you can be hurt and the law look the other way, because your nephilim. It means that you get to be a slave, and if you decide you want freedom, than they will hunt you with aids, herpes or whatever else, because to them, you are just an animal, an experiment. at least to everybody but the risen savior, the Christ who loves all God’s creatures from conception.

          • mary dyer

            Noah was found blameless and righteous, but his wife and son’s daughters were carrying nephilim. (Japeths’ wife had the most of the angel code) so in that part of the world, the code can be found in the dna, where everyone intermarried, and the tree didnt branch so much near the ark. there is a holy man healing right now in armenia, and you can see the source of God’s throne, directly raining down on the house, and everyone entering is being healed.

      • Bigblacksock


    • stoppuppymills

      It IS good. Think of ALL the advantages.

  • Mark Forrester

    Articles written by retards, for retards.

  • WAK Anamjem








      Did you forget to turn your CAPS lock off when you wrote the credits or something?

      • Kunnuk Takpanie

        Kunnuk Takpanie here Inuk from Apex Hill Iqaluit Nunavut, RH negative A. I knew that I had a weird blood type when it was in my doctor’s file in the hospital, they just told me, just in case I need blood transfusion it is noticeable. I truly believe in telepathic, as I have had since I was very young and I would go and tell my grandma and mom about someone was in my room but it was all black, and they told me that one of my relatives died. Ok, than one time I was far away from home from Iqaluit, living in Kitchener/Waterloo Ontario, and told my 6 foot 7 boyfriend to go sleep down stairs as I wanted to be comfortable sleeping that night, so he did, but I woke up middle of the night and there was someone sitting on my bed with he’s head down and he was all black and I tried touching him to give him a hug and it was nobody. So, I just went back to sleep. Than first thing in the morning I called my mom in Iqaluit and told someone was in my room that night and right away she said my cousin committee suicide and wanted to be with you. Imagine that, I knew something had happened so I called my mom. Now to me, that is communicating with each other. There are many things I can talk about with other stuff that has happen in my life time, but this is just one of them.

    • jpwp

      AHHHHHHH!! My Eyes have gone deaf with your shouting in caps!!!!!

  • Mazy

    Never hear so much pish in my life what a load of bullshit

  • Debbie Wareing

    I have no idea on the how, when, where or what for’s regarding the rhesus negative genotype. The fact is that the lack of this rhesus factor is part of the human genome.

    I have no problems with people wondering, suggesting debating or hypothesising on such issues. I also find it interesting when people think ‘outside of the box’ and develop ideas that may be controversial, different, unlikely, unpopular or even genius!
    What I do have a problem with is the quoting or the referencing of statements deemed to be from a credible source that is blatantly untrue or at least exceptionally misleading!

    You state (and I quote)..

    ‘In the Book of Genesis in the Bible it relates how the Nephilim produced children with humans. One was even depicted as killing Japheth, Noah’s son…’

    You also make further reference to the Bible (and again I quote)

    ‘the Biblical story of Noah’s son being murdered by the Nephilim and the children produced populating Northern Europe perhaps?’

    And then you have the audacity to suggest that the Bible support’s your theory (and I quote)

    ‘Many ancient texts, including, the Bible, do support this theory’
    The book of Enoch and other fragments of books found in the dead sea scrolls are not a part of the Holy Bible and therefore do not have the same standing or authority as the Bible! And they cannot be used as biblical references! As they are not from the Bible!
    The Holy Bible is the word of God!
    Although written by the hand of men the scriptures clearly acknowledge the author of the writings to be Almighty God.
    Ex 24:4, Da 7:1, 1Th 2:13, 2Tim 3:16, 2Pe 1:21, John 17:3
    Would an Almighty, Omnipotent God allow any books to be omitted from the Bible that claims to be His word?!
    Or for that matter would He allow any book to be included in the Bible as his word, if indeed it was not! I don’t think so!

    • Lucia

      And you know that because ….you were there when the good old bible was written and rewritten, not to mention all the times it was corrected with or without god’s consent simply because it was a big manipulativ tool . On the subjest of god allowing things…. all the god’s as mighty as they are believed to be, allow a lot of shit to happen. Life is not a sunday school, be a bit critical and go use your common sense and brains instead of regurgatating all the imprinted stuff. The world would be a better and safer place without all the religious fanatics. so i say less religion more common sense and love and respect for each other.

  • Misty McMillen

    No wonder I’ve always felt different and always fly in my dreams. Can’t wait for my wings to sprout!

    -,- fun to read though, I’m gonna have to look up other stuff about how ‘special’ I am

    • charmane may

      I’m A+ but I fly in my dreams too. No biggie.

  • Alison Webster

    ROFLMHO…RHESUS NEG ANGEL PERSON using this for conversation starter always…………..

  • lyone

    His Hebrew needs work.

  • Suzanne Sutherland

    Sounds like the usual claptrap I read on the internet.

  • Mark Koltko-Rivera

    This is utter nonsense from a biblical point of view. This is another example of writers seeking the sheen of authenticity by wrapping their story in the cloak of biblical authority, which would be fine–except that there is not the tiniest thing in the Bible to support what they are saying.

    Example #1: There is absolutely nothing whatsoever in the Bible to even hint that Japheth was murdered by Nephilim (or by anyone else, for that matter). The entire biblical narrative in which Japheth’s name is mentioned at all runs from Genesis 5:32 to Genesis 10:5 (not quite 6 pages)–there’s just not much to read–and there’s nothing about Japheth and the Nephilim at all.

    Example #2: There is absolutely nothing in the Talmud that somehow implies that Enoch is the same being as Abraham. In point of fact, this notion is directly contradicted by the Bible, which pointedly notes that Enoch was an ancestor of Abraham (Genesis chapter 5 entire, followed by Genesis 11:10-36).

    Beyond the matter that the Bible does not back the article up, there are other problems with the article. For example, it’s hardly credible to call the Rhesus Negative blood type “rare” if 15% of the human race has it–that’s one person in seven–or if 40% to 45% of Europeans have it (which is almost half of the European population).

    • Debbie Wareing

      Well said Mark

    • The neg family

      Well it’s all true honey. Trust me.

    • Bingo/Bingo

      Lmao, I always notice that all these so called studies about RACE published by these so called European and North American scientific magazines, are JUST a Western version of the DAESH magazine of ISS which is always trying so hard to brain washed people that ISLAM is the chosen one.

    • Lucia

      Your figures are utterly incorrect, see the latest stat’s which will tell you that 7.5% of the totall World Populace is RH neg. and in EUROPE 15%, which simply means it’s distribution is uneven

    • Michael Gunslinger

      Biblical authority is BS. It is a book derived from over 100 volumes selected by the counsel and edited to fit the Romans and Catholics. over 50% of the actual texts where granted into the so called bible. Written by 3-4 men over several continents telling stories handed down 1000’s of years old. There are much older texts written in clay baked into stone that where indeed found in 90% together condition unlike the scrolls written on parchment to disintegrate over time. I guess your God was not smart enough to do this. Left his so called story so those in power could form their own way to divide control and plunder through fear.

    • Lucia

      The world population combined has a total of 7.5 % of RH neg’s, whereas in Europe the figure is 15% compared to other parts of the world. If you are interested in a subject at least do the homework and investigate before speaking out and this goes for lots of the comments here on this site.There is a lot of B.S. being written about RH neg’s lots of it is simply incorrect. About the whole hype of the RH negs i want to say this, i said before, let’s use our brains and not create yet another feature to set us apart, we’ve already quite some of those and history has proven that the “other” blame-game is just a path leading to destruction and madness. In stead of looking what devides us let’s look what we have in common and share.. and learn to live with each other in harmony. We are all human with our great moments and pitfalls, it does not matter if we are Rh neg or RH pos, what’s important is trying to spend the little time we are here, as positive as possible and that means no pointing fingers… everybody can be of value for themselves and others, regardless of heritage and blood, just be the best you can be or at least live trying.

  • Yogini

    My mom has RH negative blood. She’s full blooded Mexican and has none of the characteristics listed above.

    • Bingo/Bingo

      My cousine has RH negative too and I agree with ya . I always notice that all these so called studies about RACE published by these so called European and North American scientific magazines, are JUST a Western version of the DAESH magazine of ISS which is always trying so hard to brain washed people that ISLAM is the chosen one , where as the Euro-American sci-magazine wanna put europeans as the coolest of all LOL

    • Ken Plowman

      so as well as NOT having blue eyes or red hair, she also does NOT possess a high intelligence? lol hey you said it man

  • neyney

    I am rh negative. I can assure you that I’m of average intelligence, have no psychic abilities, don’t have good vision or high blood pressure. I am a redhead with blue eyes and do avoid sunlight because it burns my skin. Perhaps instead of attributing my ancestry to aliens instead I would concentrate on the Northern European angle. There is evidence that red hair has a link to Neanderthals. I think that is your link. Believe me if I’m supposed to be descended from the Nephilim I’ve been robbed.

    • The neg family

      No you have been. We all have been. It’s okay if you don’t believe it. I honestly could care less. maybe one day this stuff gets discussed or you can just thank the ones from afar who save our ass everyday. It’s a thankless job.

    • charlieweird

      I saw an awesome BBC report today discussing a new neanderthal find in a French site … apparently they found a cave where neanderthals had therein constructed stone circles from broken stalagmites.. with a fire circle inside of the centre of the stalagmite circle.. it was 150,000 years old.. making neanderthals the oldest known cave dwellers, and erasing much of what we thought we knew about them.. look it up if you are interested..

    • Bingo/Bingo

      Lmao, I always notice that all these so called studies about RACE published by these so called European and North American scientific magazines, are JUST a Western version of the DAESH magazine of ISS which is always trying so hard to brain washed people that ISLAM is the chosen one. Very funny seeing how these people use their authority no manipulate the masses.

  • Alexandra1973

    Evolution is nonsense.

    At any rate, my mother is a brown-eyed brunette and so am I. She has Rh- and I have Rh+. My father-in-law has Rh-.

  • Fred Skinkis

    should we get rid of all the rh pos. blood people?
    would the world run smoother,,,,,,,maybe the NWO, will be the RHneg. and the slaves will be the RH POS.

  • Werewolf

    Interesting. I possess all of said traits. Though, I must admit I don’t know if I can be cloned.
    Let’s hope not for the sake of the world.

  • Jaymz Edwards

    Can you ask Sean Adl Tabatabai what happened to all the People’s Voice Money?

  • neyney

    I’m O negative am blind as a bat, of average intelligence and have no special psychic or intuitive abilities. I am red headed and blue eyed but I think RH neg and being a redhead with blue eyes has more to do with having Scottish ancestors than anything else. Believe me, other than being a universal blood donor there is nothing special about me.

  • Jimmy

    This was posted today, the day I decided to get curious about my blood type XD

  • Rebecca Frasier

    O type blood is NOT universal, O negative blood is the true UNIVERSAL blood type as it can give to ALL other blood types but can ONLY receive O negative blood in return. (In other words… O negative type cannot receive blood from O positive. Your statement is false.)

  • stoppuppymills

    The Nephilim ARE the saviors of the world. You are somewhat misinformed.

    • Lucia

      Have you ever read the parable/story of the little bird and the heap of horse manure.

  • asylph

    The bible is man made and written by 40 odd people over time. What is on the market today is edited and so drastically altered, that it is now a mere shadow of original texts. Man made, man-managed religions saw to that so it is absurd to argue over it, let alone believe it is accurate. My personal family is documented, person to person, family to family, back to 500AD. We have all those characteristics and more and as such, we are very private in that regard even though we maintain public positions. It’s a bloody awful struggle at times; we cannot eat mainstream food so all has to be natural; require rx sunglasses, cannot take mainstream medication, some were born with extra vertebra that require surgery (my extra is not full – only partially formed), some of us (not me) have extra ribs as well…it goes on and on…we have to make so many adjustments that it gets a bit much at times. It’s bad enough for some people to have a few of the characteristics, well try all of them – it’s a nightmare. When I read all of the conjecture that is here and on various websites I just shake my head. There is such a lot of research and things for you all to discover and yet here you are arguing over some old book. It was just one book which has become so inaccurate it’s laughable! It’s not the end all to be all. Well, I’ve spoken publicly and I will probably pay for it, but really people…climb out of the box you’ve all shoved yourselves into.

    • Lucia

      Completely agree with you also on the old blood/curse /blessing? in disguise.

  • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

    How do you know they cannot be cloned when human cloning hasn’t even been tried yet? Also, you do realize that chimps and gorillas both have their own equivalents ro rh- and rh+ as well a A/B/AB/O blood types, indicating our shared ancestry with them?

    The nephilim were mythological, not real.

  • Jen

    Check out Michael Tellinger’s video of a giant footprint in South Africa, looks like there were giants…

  • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

    It is not “homosapien” genus. “Homo” is our genus name, “sapiens” is our species name. As for the facts, we have genetics comparing us and chimps, morphological studies, plus several hundred primate fossils covering the last 50 million years. Guess what? The “nephilim” aren’t mentioned in any of that.

    • Barnabas-Francis MacPhail

      Homo sapiens is the only surviving species of the genus Homo. Modern humans are the subspecies Homo sapiens sapiens,

  • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

    And why is your judgement about the history of human evolution better than that of 200 years of palaeontology? Not everybody’s opinion on a subject is equally valid.

    • Catherine H.

      Your absolutely correct, not everyones opinion on a subject is equally valid, except to the opinionated. Are you implying that because people have been dabbling at or applying the science of paleontology for approximately 200 years that it cannot/will not yield more artifacts for “our better” understanding?
      As to my opinion/judgment about 200 yrs of paleontology well, like it or not, it is my belief that the best is yet to come especially considering the technological breakthroughs yet to come.
      An opinion is what you have when you don’t have any or all the facts (I believe we haven’t). When you have all the facts, you don’t need an opinion.
      Any fool can know. The point is to understand. – Albert Einstein

      • BigBillyBoBobLawyer

        Right on! I personally believe that The Flinstones was more historically accurate than people think.

    • Lucia

      Everybody has the right to give his opinion and who are you to say that some people´s opinion is not of value…. it might be the case for you but you can´t dismiss them the opportunity to give an opinion.Otherwise it´s Animalfarm ; All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.

      • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

        Everybody has the right to a different opinion, but we all have to deal with the same facts. And a person who’s opinion is contrary to what the facts show is is simply wrong.

        • Lucia

          I already tried to install some wisdom into your brain,Seems you probably lack the hooks to install anything there but some people would fit in perfectly in Asimov’s “I robot”, you would fit in there perfectly and there is nothing wrong in that , just try not to downgrade “real people’s ” thinking even if their ways are not according to your boring logic Logic is highly overrated, i switched from being very logical to being much more intuitive and it just brought more quality and answers in my life. Maybe you could try that to. And if wisdom does not work, the opposite primitiv, might…. and to people always trying to mess up other people on the comment section, i would say; G.F.Y.

        • Lucia

          Did (the) History of Science did not learn you, that today’s facts are tomorrow’s mistakes /missfits. In the end we will all be judged to be primitive by next generations and our truths will be what they all were in fact…..just beliefsystems. If this does not ring a bell look at the huge role of observer-effect in quantum physics, what does that tell you. And Cory, stop making a fool of yourself in the name of science you have demonstrated enough that you don’t need the argument of scientific facts to do that.

  • marko

    I’m ab negative ** male, aries- I don’t have extra vertebrae but I was born with extra tendent’s ..I dnt have green or blue eyes they are brown– my hair is blk with red tints in it- physic abilities – I have dejavu..or sometime tell something bad gona happen..

  • sgsteve88

    I thought RH neg’s have lower blood pressure not higher blood pressure?

  • Melissa Parnell

    Rh gene has also been found in nematodes (worm-like creatures) and sea sponges so… do what you will with that info. See what other crazy conspiracy theories we can generate.

    • Lucia

      Do you even know what the RH stands for, let me clear it up for you, it simply means someone looked whether the animal they are investigating be it a worm or human is somehow related to the primates genewise. And in the case you mentioned they are most probably RH neg.But even a wormbrain would not find that strange…. whereas in humans, different story. Evolution theory tells us we and the apes share a common apelike forefather and than, discovering that it is not the case in 9.7% i believe of people all over the world, that is a totally different thing, can you still grasp it melissa that we or rather you, have been comparing pears and apples and finding they are not the same, than telling those who told you so in the first place, that they are a crazy conspiracy bunch, that’s not only nasty namecalling but that statement is also anchored in serious lack of knowledge of what you are judging.but if you have a wormgene and brain we can forgive you for that.

      • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

        “discovering that it is not the case in 7.5% of people all over the world, that is a totally different thing”

        Except, unfortunately for for you, there is no such “7.5% of people”. We are *all* are descended 100% from that common ancestor of the other apes and humans. Yes, the *other* apes, for we humans are just derived apes.

        BTW, pears and apples are closely related plants. Sorta like humans and chimpanzees. 🙂

        • Lucia

          Pears and apples are both descendants of the rosefamily as such you are right, you might not be familiar with the saying/quote; comparing pears and apples. I am european so we say things in a different manner than you americans.Do you know of a system called Lego , It was a system with all kinds of parts and you could build everything with it .Matter, all matter is composed of building blocks, it’s just the ratio of the different blocks and the way they are arranged which differ to the degree, that we arrive at seemingly different species, in the end if you can see through all this, it’s just there and it isn’t…. cause it’s just all temporary illusion.All made by the great magician, he moves a finger and you are there… makes another move and you cease to exist. I used to love science but blessed or cursed with a sharp brain /IQ, depending on your outlook, if you are and dare to be critical, you are bound to come to the conclusion that science just serves us a lot of B.S. Lots of things don’t make any sense at all, i was schooled to become a critical thinker and had to read a lot, fortunately i liked it and i had a very gifted teacher.Nowadays people get degrees and know very little about a tiny fragment of a subject and that’s why we have so many problems nowadays…. we need people to see the Big- Picture once again, If you think you are a critical thinker….try to see the big picture!!!

      • Melissa Parnell

        Hi Lucia. I hope I don’t have a worm-brain or I’d worry they’d give these BSc, Master’s and PhD degrees to everyone and every thing. My first degree is in biological sciences, so yes I do understand the fraction of biology you’ve included in your reply, although your logic, and English for that matter, are a little harder to follow.
        Rh is just short-hand for Rhesus, from Rhesus factor. The Rh factor is another way of talking about the D antigen, a molecule attached to some people’s red blood cells. If you have the D antigen, your Rh positive, if you don’t, your Rh negative. Easy! Similar to the ABO blood groups. Only about 16% of people in the UK are rhesus negative (RhD-). The inheritance is controlled by your genes. It sounds like you grasped the inheritance part, as you mention evolution. By the way, it’s called a ‘common ancestor’ not forefather. Yes all humans are related to each other at some point, and to the great apes, and the other apes, and primates, etc etc. No angels I’m afraid. Although it’s a nice story and one I wish was true, especially as I’m Rh negative myself!

  • Rado

    Interesting article.

    However, the Nephilim and all Fallen Angels offsprings and racial lineage was extinguished at the flood. Beside the Rh antibody system, inside the human blood, resides many other similar immunological systems that have no clinical significance, and are less known to general public.

  • Merle Raymond Noll


  • Bingo/Bingo

    Lmao ! I’ ve been noticing that all these so called studies published by this so called European and North American scientific magazines about RACE are a Western version of the DAESH magazine of ISS which are always trying so hard to brain washed people on which is the BEST religion on earth.

  • Bingo/Bingo

    DUMB assumption . What does having green/ blue eyes and light hair have to do with the RH negative and the ALiens Lmao? when in fact all RH positive and all other Europeans with the other blood types have the same physical characteristic like all Rhesus monkeys do : green/blue eyes light color hair.

  • John Sebastian

    This is the belief system of the UFO sex-cult that is running much of the United States and is in power around the world in many other countries. The same theme is repeated in many Sy-Fy movies, novels and articles. This is because Hellywood is run by B’nai Brith Freemasons. This is racist Jewish freemasonry. All the original studio heads that were given the initial television licenses were all Jewish freemasons. These studios now own almost everything you see, read and hear outside of most newspapers which are owned mainly by other members of their sex-cult. Hollywood owns most of the major publishing houses, most of the major record labels, ABC, CBS, NBC, many advertising agencies and they have many other holdings. Don’t buy into this garbage. And it is GARBAGE! This is just another religion trying to impose and shove their belief system down everyone’s throats against their wills. Once exposed there will be an utter rejection of their ABSOLUTELY INSANE RELIGION that will be unlike any other religious rejection or repudiation in the history of mankind. And they DAMN WELL know it’s coming! Evolution is their creation story and is the only reason that it is where it is. Otherwise it would be just another “theory” AT BEST! But in reality …. there are no transitional species when they should be EVERYWHERE around us in the visible world. One should not have to dig ANYTHING up. It is NOWHERE in the visible world and is about as likely as things turning out well for their fake elitist religion. Scientology, Mormonism and many other cults including many OPENLY (as opposed to hidden) Luciferian cults are offshoots from freemasonry, even “church plants” by freemasonry itself. What they leave out from their rhetoric as they left it out of this thinly veiled article is that the “fallen angels” they speak of are SATAN AND HIS FALLEN ANGLES. So yes, if you follow this UFO sex-cult group, their belief system, and the indoctrinating of you and your children you are being influenced by a modern day Satanic cult.

  • Jacob Daniel Gierok

    Cain and Able (male + a male)
    (Yet wasn’t it really Jared and Cain)
    Gave birth to Enoch the prophet.
    Enoch gave birth to:
    Jared (yet wasn’t his name actually Jaser), Mathesulah (Yet wasnt his name actually Mahalel?), and Lamech. I’m sure Jared was actually one of Enoch’s two father’s.
    Why are certain Christian translations of the book of Genesis different from the way the Torah was written? And the son of Lamech (Enoch’s grandson)was Noah or Nur? Then who are Regime and Gaidad? And how could 2 males give birth to a male (Enoch) and who was Enoch’s wife?

  • Ken Plowman

    he forgot one of the most noticeable of all traits of the rh negative… we’re so fine!

  • Leanna

    Sorry, this is an old discussion, I haven’t read through all comments.. I can only comment On myself and experiences as an A- RH Neg individual.. As a child all I can remember is mother having premonitions.. majority of the time was in her dreams. The following day or so they turned into reality. She passed away when I was nine years old. Throughout my adolescence and early adult life I would have random dreams or premonitions and self doubted myself.. turns out majority of times what I saw eventually happened. To the point where I dreamt of my now ex-husband having an affair.. it was proven to be true shortly after that dream/nightmare. I am extremely sensitive to human emotions yet at times try not to give in or bond. There is some disconnect and
    makes me almost believe in this theory:(

  • binkyboo

    That the rhesus factor comes originally from monkies is a blatant error. It was misakenly thought that years ago, but in up to date medical test books it has been revised.Get yiur facts rights. There are a lot of other Biblical errors too.
    I am rh negative and was looking for info, but certainky not from this site!!!!!!

    • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

      The Rh factor wasn’t named that because it comes from monkeys, it was so named because the antigen was discovered through experiments using rhesus macaque blood t try and determine why blood transfusions still sometimes caused problems even though the ABO blood groups matched. Initially, rabbits were inoculated with rhesus blood and had an immune response on further inoculations, and later human blood was found to have a very similar antigen to the one in rhesus blood that caused the rabbits’ immune systems to react.

  • bambuliacka

    Im not Rh -, but according to what I read in many articles about Rh – people, strangely, I have many of their characteristics – 1. naturally reddish tone in hair, 2. webbed feet, 3. large cranium, 4. high cheekbones, 5. high forehead, 6. almond shaped eyes, 7. I dont like the strong sunshine and sunbathing, 8. I had some supernatural experience in past….But Im damn sure Im not Rh – as I asked the nurses several times when I hapepned to be in a hospital or at the GP. As to what is stated in the article – interesting, but I dont know, I personally dont believe in any parallel race, I think the Rh- may just be a kind of mutation similarly to blond hair and blue eyes….I know, someone may argue that if this is “just” a mutation, then how come the body of Rh- mother refuses her phoetus, but I think thats because blood is so much important thing in our bodies, so much more than our hair colour or eye colour and if the blood does not match then of course that may be a trouble. And I definitely dont believe in the alien origin…But that may be just my opinion, I of course dont know the truth about many things in our life. Also, I know some people who are Rh- (not a lot though) and they are quite ordinary at abilities, personality as well nothing special, plus they lead a quite ordinary life…..just normal people like most of us on the Earth….

  • Nanette McCoy

    I found it pretty cool! Where does one find the true historical facts? After all, a lot of history is pure distortion. Where did you people who criticize him get your sources from? I think the bottom line that he is making is that ….satan exists throughout history.

  • Nanette McCoy

    A lot of critics on here. Can I please watch your great vids? Thanks…please feel free to share your history sources and videos. I am quite curious.

  • M. Marsares

    Dammit. Just turn the article into an episode of ‘Ancient Aliens’ and be done with it.

  • Terry Todaro Ballard Schaferme

    Just a question, 4 kids same parents, different blood types, wouldn’t we all come from me bloodlines>

    • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

      Do you remember from high school science class the idea of dominant and recessive alleles, i.e. how two brown-eyed people can have blue-eyed kids? It’s the same for blood types.

      Theres 3 alleles for blood type – A, B, and o – and everybody has two alleles, one from each parent. A & B are the dominant alleles and o is recessive meaning it gets overrules by an A or B alele. So if you have the AA pair or the Ao pair your blood type will be A, or if you have BB or Bo you’ll be blood type B. Since A & B are both dominant, if you have the AB allele pair you get the mixed blood type AB. Of you have the oo pair of alleles you have type O blood.

      If an Ao allele pair woman has kids with a Bo man, there’s four possibilities that their kids could end up with based on which alleles they pass on to each kid. You might remember the Punnet Square from science class which is used to list out all the possible combinations from what alleles the parents have.


      The A/B/O blood type grouping is a separate gene from the Rh+/Rh- blood type so having a specific value from the one group doesn’t affect what you’ll have in the other group. What matters is what alleles you parents had to pass on to you when you were conceived.

  • Skeptic

    Nothing is true. Everything is simpley a distraction – ignore them ALL for the truth

  • jericho tm

    Its impossible! The so called Nephilim (by the way, this name is for the offsprings) were destroyed during the Great Deluge… it must be something else…

  • Emilia Lambas

    I am also RH neg. but what confuses me I am the only RH in my entire family that has this blood type I have 5 brothers and 2 sister .can someone explain that one for me lol

    • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

      Do you remember the module on genetics in grade 9 science class, like how two brown-eyed people can have a blue-eyed baby? That bit about dominant versus recessive alleles? The rh factor in human blood works the same way as brown and blue eyes. Rh+ is the dominant allele and rh- is the recessive allele. You’re the only two get two recessive alleles, one from each parent, so you’re the only rh- person. Most of your siblings will have one rh+ allele and one rh- allele, but the dominant rh+ is, well, dominating the rh- allele so they are all rh+ blood type.

  • Fred Fredricksen

    The bible follows two families the sons of Cain, and the Sons of Seth. The sons of darkness like to acuse the sons of light with all the things they are up too. When necessary, they will throw in a teaser of truth, to make the lie all the more palletable. Enjoy the false teaching here so, when you are jealous that someone is different and un-corrupted, you can think they are the ones that are corrupt explaining to your hurt feelings why they seem more clean and pure than yourselves.

  • Emilia Lambas

    I don’t understand the RH factor .I have brown hair and brown eyes and I am RH neg . but they say that the RH neg people has red are light colored hair and green are hazel eyes ..

    • http://boringskeptic.tumblr.com/ Cory Albrecht

      Eye and skin colour are associated because the genes that control them are found on the same part of Chromosome 15, so when the DNA recombining phase of cell division happens and chromosomes swap parts, eye colour and skin colour are likely to get swapped along with each other. However, blue-eyed African people are not unknown which shows that sometimes the swapped bits do only contain just the gene for eye colour or just the genes for skin colour.

      The Rh factor gene, though is on Chromosome 1, and the populations that have the highest number of Rh- people are Saudi Arabians and Morrocans at 29%, two populations that are no known for having pale skin or red hair.

      It’s interesting to note that the gene for blue eyes is known to be very young, where the Rh factor gene has variations in apes and old-world monkeys (“Rh” stands for “Rhesus monkey”, where it was first discovered) and is thus tens of millions of years old. https://owlcation.com/social-sciences/Black-People-with-Blue-Eyes

  • Emilia Lambas

    and one more thing there is no one in my family that is RH neg.none of
    my siblings are. both my parents are not RH . I am very.confused

  • Michelle Booy

    If RH negative people cannot be cloned then why are there so many clones in the Whitehouse? In movies, in Hollywood? All these ‘stars’ are cloned…yet I know that prince William and Kate Middleton aren’t exact clones of Yahshuah and Mary Magdalena. Why? Because the bloodline of the SON OF MAN is not serpent blood. All you snakes can burn!