Stephen Hawking Died And Was Replaced in The 80’s

Stephen Hawking died in the 80's and was replaced with a lookalike

The real Stephen Hawking died in the 1980’s and was replaced with a lookalike, according to astonishing new photographic evidence compiled by conspiracy theorists online. 

According to internet sleuths, simple photo analysis will reveal that the the real Stephen Hawking was replaced many years ago, and the public have been duped into thinking that Hawking is one of the only ALS sufferers to live such a long life.

Miles Mathis reports: I have written several papers critiquing Stephen Hawking, including a long one on his Brave New World series for the BBC. But this is my first paper really linking my science research with my faked events research. I will use simple photo analysis and facial analysis to quickly show you the current Stephen Hawking is not the same person as the original Stephen Hawking.

This should not surprise you too much, especially if you know something about ALS. ALS is Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, also known as Lou Gehrig’s Disease. We are told Hawking has had ALS for over 52 years, which is a record by many decades. Jason Becker is the only person I have heard of who has lived more than 20 years with the disease, so there is about a three-decade difference between the longest survivor and the second longest survivor. That is a more than 100% difference between first and second place. It would be like Justin Gatlin running the 100 meters in 9.8 seconds, and Usain Bolt beating him with a time of 4.5 seconds. In other words, statistically it doesn’t happen.

The average survival time for ALS is four years. When Hawking was first diagnosed in 1963, doctors gave him two years to live. And yet here we are, 52 years later and counting. Should you believe it? Well, no. Like Becker, it appears the real Hawking did beat the odds and live for about 20 years. But at some point he was replaced. I have no proof he died, but I assume that is why they replaced him. He was a very useful public relations entity for physics, and they didn’t want to lose him.

But rather than speculate on that, let us go right to the evidence. I won’t call it proof, since of course you are free to disagree with me. This is an opinion piece, not a court transcript; and even if it were a stamped court finding, you would be free to disagree with it. You don’t have to agree with anything anyone tells you, ever. Remember that. This paper is nothing more than presented evidence, evidence I find compelling. If you also find it compelling, fine. If you don’t, also fine.

The picture under title is the real Hawking. Notice the longish face and skinny neck. Also notice the dark brown hair. Here is another picture of the real Hawking:

Let that etch into your brain. This is also Hawking, a few years later:

You see that his hair is turning gray. But the thing to notice here is his teeth. Pretty awful, right?

Well, it gets worse.

He is now fully gray, and he has pretty much lost his lower teeth. I am not a dentist and don’t know exactly what is going on there, but it looks like those teeth have been filed down or chipped down, with only stub fillings left. The next step would be dentures, right?

Well, no. The next step, apparently, was going from gray to blonde, even in the eyebrows, and a whole new set of old yellow teeth. He also bought some new fat cheeks. Amazing right?

Actually, that is the replacement. That isn’t Hawking, as I hope you can see now that I point it out. Go back two photos and compare the teeth directly. Not even close. They found a guy with the same nose and big ears, but otherwise they don’t look that much alike. This is the guy you have been looking at for the past thirty years. Which means Hawking might not have written A Brief History of Time, which came out in 1988. I haven’t pinpointed the date, but that was about the time they made the switch. My current guess is early 80’s, which—if true—would mean that book was a forgery.

You will say, “That is just a younger Hawking, before he lost those lower teeth.” No, it isn’t. I just showed you the younger Hawking, and he didn’t look like that. Compare them side by side.

Besides, the first picture is Hawking from the 1970’s. The second is Hawking from the 1990’s. Amazing that he aged 20 years with a debilitating disease and got younger looking at the same time, isn’t it?

Hawking was still looking young in 2007, when he went aboard the ZeroG Plane:

See how it says “zero g” on his shirt? That is from when he went up in the plane, which was in 2007. He was supposed to be 65 in 2007. Looks great for 65, eh? Unfortunately, he already looked older than that in 1982, 25 years earlier:

His face also got shorter. Normally your face will get longer as you age, not shorter.

Here is a more recent photo of the impostor:

Again, the teeth are the clue. This may be the same guy as our blonde impostor, but it certainly isn’t Stephen Hawking. Go back to the earlier photos. Those four lower teeth were supposed to be gone decades ago, filed down to filling nubs. Are we supposed to believe they regrew? Do those look like caps or dentures to you? Would you pay a dentist to replace your teeth with those? No, we are supposed to believe that is what he has left of his real teeth, obviously. But I have just shown you why that cannot be the case.

Here is a photo I found of the blonde impostor where is it really easy to see he isn’t Hawking:

  • Constant Fiasco

    Get someone from the airport, who checks passport photos, to have a look.

    • Rosebud

      What do we need someone from the airport for? The difference between both men is as clear as the difference between night and day.

  • paddi lee

    What is this rubbish?! Can ALS be staged by an actor? My god! S. Hawking has grown up children. Dna test can prove any time his identity.

  • S K

    Look at the man’s ears. On all the photos they are identical. Ears are the hardest part of the human face to fake

    • http://www.karmabooks.co.uk/ Karma Singh

      Dunno S K,
      Ears appear similar but on no two photos do you get the same angle so impossible to say how closely they resemble each other.

  • Joyshree Chakraborty

    Teeth and his face are not at all identical. Moreover yes, I do believe as human beings grow older, face becomes longer instead of being shorter. So according to me something fishy is there. Obviously life tenure is one of the most important part for the disease ALS.

  • hesofukincreeeepy

    He is a very very creepy spastic….. he is a tool of satan and has been used very effectively by the power elites…ewww every time I see the little spastic he creeeeps me out…ewww creeepy

    • Anticon

      You’re a shallow jerk.

      • lionel

        I tend to agree the spazzo is creepy….. hes like…kinda sickening little freakshow

  • rtards

    “He should have longer face”
    OMG, he has no teeth on last picture, that means no mouth and shorter face. Your logic is shit

  • Paul Adams

    other clues to examine are the hands, finger length/shape

  • http://www.karmabooks.co.uk/ Karma Singh

    For me, the teeth are the clincher.
    The 2017 teeth, front, lower jaw are very, very much better than the 1982 teeth yet they are definitely real.

    I’ve long had suspicions about Mr. Hawkins, not the least for the fact that, despite the total failure of conventional medicine (but, then, some people are stupid like that) he refused to even consider trying methods which do work for this easy to heal variation upon the theme “Mercuric Poisoning” – presumably from his many amalgan fillings plus a heavy handful of vaccines.

    Blessed be

    Karma Singh

  • luvgabe

    Same W-shaped creases and vertical indentation between eyebrows in both “real” and “fake” Hawking.

  • Jdubbz31

    Some days,I swear Kim Kardashians ass is smaller than usual. She must’ve also died and they have a stunt double of her to keep her,whatever she does for society,alive. SMH

  • Anticon

    Yournewswire.com is a Russian front for disinformation. Idiotic fake news attempt.

  • john anderson 42069

    Wouldn’t the “new Hawkins” have to have lived as long as the “old Hawkins” to look as old as he does? So not 1 but 2 men with ALS have lived for 50 years?

    • Krusty

      shutup moron

      • john anderson 42069

        What about that makes me a moron? How is that not a valid question? Your name calling rebuttals tells me you don’t got shot to say that’s relevant.

  • Sleeveheart

    If I had his current teeth, I could be the corncob eating champion in 5 days.