Latest

US Seeks To Sustain Growth Of ISIS To Wreak Havoc In Middle East

Former American intelligence linguist, Scott Rickard, has said that the United States seeks to sustain the growth of ISIS in order to wreak havoc in the middle east, and thus allow the US military-industrial complex to thrive.

“The fact remains that the coalition forces pretty much led by the US and the British empire, England, have really been designed to maintain the growth of ISIS, not to cease its operations,” he said in an interview with Press TV.

Presstv.ir reports:

The US military is not using its overwhelming force to destroy ISIL because the group’s demise will destroy a major source of revenue for the American military-industrial complex, Rickard told Press TV on Saturday.

ISIL’s downfall will end the US military campaign and along with it the “economic prosperity that’s coming out of this endless and perpetual war that’s really been created and funded and also perpetuated by the West,” he added.

Rickard characterized ISIL as a “mercenary force”, armed and funded by the very same coalition that has been engaged in the bombing campaign against the group for nearly 10 months.

The ISIL terrorists have been able to maintain 80 to 90 percent of territory under their control in 4 to 6 thousands of coalition sorties targeting their positions, he said.

A senior Obama administration official said Tuesday that the battle to destroy ISIL in Iraq could take at least three to five years.

State Department spokesman John Kirby, a retired Navy admiral, appeared on a talk show to clarify President Barack Obama’s comments at the G7 summit the day before, in which he admitted his administration lacked a “complete strategy” against ISIL.

“We do have a strategy, the president was referring to a specific plan to improve training and equipping of the Iraqi security forces,” Kirby said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

Recent setbacks in Iraq and Syria have raised serious doubts about Obama’s strategy, months after he announced an open-ended military air campaign to “degrade and ultimately destroy” ISIL forces by enlisting the support of allies.

  • WAK Anamjem

    INTERESTING SKETCHES OF ART LEAD ISIS TO CIA STRANGE? ILLUMINATI PROPAGANDA? WHO INVITED INVADERS IN LEVANT AND WHO INVITED TERROR IN RETALIATION BACK IN THEIR HOMES?

    ISIS & REBELS IN WHATEVER FORM ARE CRUSHED SON OF SOIL THOSE ARE IN FIGHT AGAINST BRUTAL GOVERNMENTS AND RESPONSIBLE OF KILLINGS OF 1.6 MILLION & 11 MILLION REFUGEES? RUSSIAN & IRANIAN LOBBIES HELPING BRUTAL GOVERNMENTS OF LEVANT!

    TO HELP BRUTALS BY USA AND ALLIED FORCES ARE MORE STRANGE? THE PEACEMAKERS OF SUPERPOWERS AND OIL RICH COUNTRIES DID NOT ENCOURAGED BRUTAL AND BUTCHER GOVERNMENTS OF IRAQ AND SYRIA IN LEVANT?

    IS THIS NOT A LIVE HOLOCAUST TO HIDE TO COVER SOME BRUTAL KILLINGS OF ISIS? IS THIS NOT HATE AGAINST PARTICULAR THOSE ARE HARD ISLAMISTS? IS THIS NOT A FEAR TO OIL RICH ARAB KINGDOMS AND IRAN? IS THIS NOT UKRAINE WAR DIVERTED TO LEVANT BECAUSE OF FEAR OF OPPONENTS IS TOP NUKE POSSESSOR?

  • Salvador G. Jimenez

    The US military industry is the chief beneficiary of the war against ISIS and their Islamic State,by selling expensive bombs and weapons to the failed states of the Middle East. The US figured a way to recover the billions of dollars given for oil to the Middle East and keep them busy while we control their oil with the help of the Saudi King. Russia is the only big headache of the US. They regretted inviting Russia involvement.