Latest

Why Is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?

‘China has one of the most vaccination compliant populations in the world. In fact, measles vaccine is mandatory. So why have they had over 700 measles outbreaks from 2009 and 2012 alone?  The obvious answer is the the measles vaccines are simply NOT effective

A recent study published in PLoS titled, “Difficulties in eliminating measles and controlling rubella and mumps: a cross-sectional study of a first measles and rubella vaccination and a second measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination,” has brought to light the glaring ineffectiveness of two measles vaccines (measles–rubella (MR) or measles–mumps–rubella (MMR) ) in fulfilling their widely claimed promise of preventing outbreaks in highly vaccine compliant populations.

According to the study:

“The reported coverage of the measles-rubella (MR) or measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is greater than 99.0% in Zhejiang province. However, the incidence of measles, mumps, and rubella remains high.” (emphasis added)

China’s Great Mandatory Vaccine Experiment FAILURE:

Zhejiang is an eastern coastal province of the People’s Republic of China and home to 55 million inhabitants. All children there receive a compulsory first dose of MR at 8 months and another dose of the MMR vaccine at 18–24 months.

In the new study researchers analyzed a subset of 1,015 Zehjiang inhabitants and found that despite the recent measles outbreaks 93.6% of them were seropositive for measles antibodies, meaning they had presumably vaccine-induced protective antibodies against measles in their blood serum — more than is required to obtain so-called ‘herd immunity’ threshold of 88%–92%, which is often claimed to be the solution to extinguishing infectious diseases altogether.[2] And yet despite this theoretical ‘protection,’ eight-seven (8.6%) of the subjects developed measles anyway.

Another recent study, published in the highly authorative Bulletin of the World Health Organization, looked at recent measles occurrences throughout China and found that there were 707 measles outbreaks in the country recorded between 2009 and 2012, with a steep trend upwards in 2013: “The number of measles cases reported in the first 10 months of 2013 – 26 443 – was three times the number reported in the whole of 2012.” This is all the more odd considering that since 2009 “…the first dose of measles-virus-containing vaccine has reached more than 90% of the target population.” One would expect with increasing measles vaccine uptake there would result in a decrease in measles incidence.

Clearly the vaccines aren’t as effective as claimed, nor is the concept of herd immunity — which is debunked and decimated here and here — supported unequivocally by the epidemiological evidence.

The failure of vaccine-induced antibody titers to protect against ‘vaccine preventable disease’ may make more sense when you consider the antibody-based theory of vaccine efficacy – a fundamental tenet of vaccinology/immunology – was recently called into question: Study Calls Into Question Primary Justification for Vaccines. Injecting aluminum and other highly immunotoxic adjuvants into the body in order to stimulate elevated antibody titers does not in and of itself guarantee their affinity for the antigen they are supposed to be protecting you against. To the contrary, It is much like saying you have improved the overall health of the beehive by kicking it with your boot to stir its angry residents and getting them to sting (and hence die) the closest thing around them.’

Continue reading article by Sayer Ji  founder of  GreenMedInfo

  • AutismDadd

    Great info

  • Alex Randomkat

    If you guys would actually read the study published in PLoS… please… just read the study…

    stop judging studies by their titles…

    • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

      The only trouble is that the death cultists are scientifically illiterate. They have no idea what the title means, let alone the contents.

      • ione murphy

        Could you please explain this study to me?

        ‘The genetic basis for interindividual immune response variation to measles vaccine: new understanding and new vaccine approaches’

        “While the current measles vaccine used in the USA and many other countries is safe and effective, paradoxically in the unique case of measles, it appears to insufficiently induce herd immunity in the population. This relates to a combination of factors including: higher than observed rates of primary and secondary vaccine failure in clinical practice versus that seen in clinical trials. Regardless, the current vaccine, for both scientific and cultural reasons, has not demonstrated the ability to eradicate measles, despite high rates of use over decades. The need for new approaches is apparent and pressing.”

        • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

          No, because you haven’t shown me the study. From the description, it would appear that they’re interested in more effective measles prophylaxes, particularly where herd immunity is concerned.

          • AutismDadd

            Buh Wah Ha Ha she made you look like a baboon

          • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

            It takes a very confused mind to see it that way. One like yours!

          • AutismDadd

            Pretty lame response. Want a banana?

        • Mike Stevens

          “Could you please explain this study to me?
          ‘The genetic basis for interindividual immune response variation to measles vaccine: new
          understanding and new vaccine approaches’ “

          I am pleased you admit your ignorance about measles and vaccination and are keen to correct it, Ione.

          The study you cite explains that although attenuated measles vaccine has worked extremely well (“The last 10 years have shown that the increasing immunization coverage with the current live-attenuated measles vaccine, the two-dose schedule and the implementation of appropriate measles control measures decreased global measles mortality by 74% from the 535,000 deaths that occurred in 2000.”) it has limitations. The authors suggest eradication may only be possible with new approaches to vaccine development.

          The study analysed several genetic determinants regulating measles vaccine-induced immunity, including HLA class I and HLA class II genotypes, and single nucleotide polymorphisms in
          cytokine/cytokine receptor genes and the membrane cofactor measles receptor CD46. They are trying to characterise the causal genetic variants of measles, to assist in their understanding of vaccine-induced immunity and its regulation. This will inform the development of next-generation measles vaccines and help improved vaccination mechanisms.

          Glad to be of help to you, Ione.

          If you wish me to explain other research studies to you, don’t hesitate to ask.

          • AutismDadd

            So they have NEVER understood these factors but hey let the experimentation continue. They never answer for their shortfalls or their blunders, they just claim victory and self anoint themselves.

          • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

            That’s why nobody should build an airplane until we fully understand and perfectly prevent every single reason a plane could ever possibly, theoretically fail 100.00% of the time. Ships and automobiles should be similarly outlawed.

          • AutismDadd

            I fail to understand your point. Planes, ships, etc are not vaccines.

          • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

            Of course you fail to understand my point. That goes without saying.

          • AutismDadd

            Simply means your argument was pointless. Go without saying.

          • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

            No, it has more to do with your dishonesty and density. I recommend learning what the Nirvana fallacy is.

          • AutismDadd

            I recommend you take up cliff diving.

          • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

            It’d be safer than having you for a father.

          • AutismDadd

            You never get tired of being wrong. Keep it up.

          • Alex Randomkat

            Interesting little read.

        • AutismDadd

          You’re mean. These stooges can’t answer that, they haven’t received their indoctrination packages on that one yet.

      • AutismDadd

        Is that what you call pro-vacs? Apropo

        • http://www.pseudolaw.com Ken S.

          No, but you’re not very bright, are you?

          • AutismDadd

            Is that your victory of the year? Did you get drunk partying over that small victory? I imagine so.

    • AutismDadd

      More junk research?

      • Alex Randomkat

        No, but if you actually read the studies the author cites as “proof,” they actually support the effectiveness of vaccines, not ineffectiveness. I’m just pointing out some people have a habit of citing studies as proof without even reading the abstract or results…

        • AutismDadd

          No study shows PROOF, they show conclusions and consensus based on what they have or think they have or claim to have. That’s why its all junk.

          • Alex Randomkat

            I’m not debating the effectiveness of studies here, I already “resolved” that with you a while ago… unless you want to continue that?

          • Alex Randomkat

            And I say resolved in quotes because you just left me with an insult after I said my piece and just left. So it’s not really resolved, but I (maybe wrongly? Who knows.) assumed I won since there as no further arguing.

          • AutismDadd

            You may think so in your own mind, but I’m hardly adopting your opinion..

          • Alex Randomkat

            Of course you aren’t.

          • AutismDadd

            Whoa snappy comeback

  • JGC

    Short answer? China isn’t.

    the PLoS study found that in Zheijiang province in 2011 there were:
    9 patients with measles, representing 3 infants who were too young to be vaccinated and 6 young adults whose vaccination status was unknown

    1122 patients with mumps

    186 patients with rubella

    No large measles outbreak, but rubella and mumps incidence greater than that of the US.

    Why is that? Because China added vaccination for rubella to its routine vaccination schedule in 2007 and vaccination for mumps in 2010, the late addition means that even if compliance today is at 99% there’s a large pool of children and young adults who have never been vaccinated against the diseases.