WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange suggests that Seth Rich leaked the Clinton emails

WikiLeaks have suggested that murdered DNC staffer Seth Rich leaked the Clinton and Podesta emails, and not Russian hackers as is widely reported.

According to a new interview in the U.K.’s Daily mail newspaper, WikiLeaks say that U.S. intelligence reports suggesting that Russia interfered with the U.S. elections to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary are “absolutely wrong”.

Alexanderhiggins.com reports:

In the interview Wikileaks envoy Craig Murray and former British ambassador stated the he personally flew to the United States and was handed both the DNC emails and the Podesta emails.

Murray told the Daily Mail the emails came from DNC insider with legal access to the emails who had knowledge of the corruption within the Clinton Foundation leaked the emails because he was frustrated with the DNC rigging the Democratic primaries against Bernie Sanders.

Murray stated regardless of whether Russia hacked any emails or not the Wikileaks emails did not come from Russia.

‘Neither of the leaks came from the Russians,’ Murray said. ‘The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks.’

He said the motivation behind the leaks was ‘disgust at the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the tilting of the primary election playing field against Bernie Sanders.’

The new information may likely lead U.S. intelligence sources to the more information about the source of the leak given they will be able to cross-reference Murray’s flight records and cross-reference satellite and CCTV cameras during the time Murray was in Washington.

Murray told the Express that the person that who handed over the e-mails was from the Democratic National Committee (DNC).

Murray’s statements now officially corroborate prior claims initially made by Director Oliver Stone who suggested the leak was most likely an inside job in an interview with CNN three months ago.

Wikileaks is also retweeting confirming that Russia was not their source.

https://twitter.com/WLTaskForce/status/809205212455964672

Although Wikileaks still is not officially naming their source Wikileaks is adding more fuel to the fire fueling the conspiracy that their source was suspiciously murdered DNC Staffer Seth Rich.

Wikileaks began the speculation back in August when Assange insinuated to Dutch news sources the the source of the leaked emails was Seth Rich.

As Buzzfeed reported:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange floated the possibility on Tuesday that a murdered Democratic National Committee staffer was an informant for the organization.

“Whistleblowers often take very significant efforts to bring us material and often at very significant risks,” Assange said in an interview to be aired Tuesday on the Dutch television program Nieuwsuur. “There’s a 27-year-old who works for the DNC and who was shot in the back, murdered, just a few weeks ago, for unknown reasons as he was walking down the streets in Washington.”

Seth Rich, a DNC employee who did voter outreach, was shot to death last month early in the morning in Washington, D.C. The case is unsolved and police have speculated it was an attempted robbery.

On Reddit, Rich’s death has become the source of theories about whether he was involved in the leaks of emails and files from the Democratic National Committee last month. US intelligence officials have linked the leak to a Russian hack, though there has been no official conclusion on the matter.

“I am suggesting that our sources take risks and they become concerned to see things occurring like that,” Assange added, when asked what he was alleging. “We don’t comment on who our sources are.”

Asked by interviewer Eelco Bosch van Rosenthal why he would speculate about someone being shot, Assange said it showed “our sources face serious risks.”

This was coupled by a tweet from WikiLeaks offering a reward for information leading to the conviction of Rich’s murderer.

Here’s Assange’s Interview:

Murray told the Guardian:

Speaking to The Guardian, Mr Murray said: “I know who leaked them.

“I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.

“As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two.”

  • Pete Needham

    This oughta be good…

  • Larry Lassere

    The media knows if they saturate
    the minds of the gullible with impressions – eventually the impressions become
    truth in the minds of the gullible.

  • Klee

    Seth Rich was shot in the back at his apartment as he was walking inside. No money taken, nothing missing yet they call it a robbery-homicide. He was killed shortly before it was released that Wasserman-Schultz had rigged the primaries against Bernie to aid Hillary. As Rich was a staffer with the DNC, they all attended his funeral.

    • salparadise

      Like the Mafia, and I’m Italian. This is a disgrace!.

      • Joseph E Fasciani

        I’m Canadian-Italian, an old Chicagbo boy, and I agree: “Si, si, si!”

    • Monica Riggs

      Sadly Whistle Blowers are far to often killed, another DC Cover up. Pay to Play. Damn shame when the integrity in investigative services are surrendered, for poor investments by human losses. I’ll bet this young man was shocked by the nasty filth of politics. A wise man said “An absolute Horror show”!

      • George Walsh

        Can you cite cases of whistle blowers being killed? How do you know this was a “DC cover up.” What information do you have? Reveal your information!

        • devilsadvocate01

          It certainly smells enough to go on. I just the declassified report of the “Russian boogeyman did it” theory and more disappointed I could not be! It includes not one shred of evidence. It sums up as “we assess Russia did it”, then they go to talk about RT make propaganda for Russian commercial interests and that some Russian officials made some positive statements about Trump. It doesn’t prove the Seth Rich angle but it has no more evidence at this point.

          However, as a democrat and putting myself in Seth’s shoes I would have been appalled to discover the rampant favoritism being played by a publicly declared “neutral” organization and probably would have done the same thing. Even though I voted HRC in the primary, it was shocking to see this happen and perhaps the most frustrating thing is how LITTLE media attention and scrutiny is on the scandal and how much is on Russia. It’s a major problem that threatens the strength of our party. Something is not right here.

          • Herb Branch

            Both Clapper and Brennen are DC/DNC political insiders who are not neutral pursuers of global intelligence activites. Both have lied numerous times in public testimony regarding what is going on with Iran, Syria and elsewhere. They and their network of Democrat Insiders at CIA, DIA, NSA, etc., have skewed intel ops and briefs for Democrat party goals. It has been sickening to grasp the general outline of the magnitude of it.

            I am a former supporter of US military intelligence ops in Europe during the LBJ years. The screwups of field intel reports after they reached DC were not many, but consequential. Including, ignoring a serious 3 week in advance warning that the USSR and Warsaw Pact militaries were going to launch a sudden armored blitz invasion of Czechoslovakia in Spring 1968.

            When they did, the LBJ Admin was caught with pants down, and later blamed the intel community of failure to supply “timely” intelligence. But, we did. The NSC never got the report. The report was found in the “hold box” at the Intel Field Office desk in the Pentagon. Because the One Star who manned the post was there because he was LBJs personal friend, and because LBJ had not yet decided to not run for re-election in1968, the whole matter was covered up.

            LBJ had his SecDef (Robert Strange McNamara, whose management of Vietnam war was losing the war) set in motion the dissolution of the Army intel op that had discovered the pending invasion and reported same — to be dispersed to the 4-corners of the world and replaced by an Air Force intel op in 1970. Then, in 1972, the base emptied and the property was turned over to West Germany. The whole process was set in motion in 1968, and never brought to the attention of the Nixon Admin for review. That is how the Dems in DC cover up their crappy mistakes!

            From one who was there and saw these things happen (which you then could not talk about for at least 10 years, or in some cases 20 years)!

    • George Walsh

      There is no evidence of anything other than a robbery attempt. there was mention in a police report that his watch band was damaged suggesting that an attempt to rob his watch was made. What is your point about the Wasserman-Schultz revelation? Do you have some information? Reveal it if you do.

    • devilsadvocate01

      The evidence is good an buried but if I were a betting man, he was the source and murdered for it. Russia was a false flag to take attention off the scandal with the propaganda engine of WaPo, NY Times, Huffington, CNN, et al lending their support by refusing to cover a major scandal and instead focus on Russian conspiracy theories.

  • fits

    Someone with an axe to grind; Hillary was not exactly loved from what many books written about her have described. Bernie caved in and left his supporters in the lurch. Why should they ever trust him? The Democrats have nobody.

  • Susie Ni

    Thank you Seth for getting it revealed.

  • William Sparling

    Please product the verifiable evidence to counter to claims of “fake news”.

  • AdrienneHB

    WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

    -say it ain’t so! You mean, our PRESIDENT, the CIA and HILLARY are LYING TO US?

    What I find rather delightful is the irony they’ve set up: if Russia WAS guilty, WE THE PEOPLE HAD TO DEPEND IN RUSSIA TO GET THE TRUTH-because the aforementioned leaders can’t be relied on to do so.

    Read: http://yournewswire.com/wikileaks-seth-rich-leaked-clinton-emails/

    • Eudoxia

      Irony is beautiful. All they can do now is show themselves up to be the immature disturbed people they are. Blaming others is a hallmark trait of low emotional maturity. Hence the need to blame others. If you have experienced a toddler throwing a tantrum in a supermarket think of the current US establishment – Obama, Clinton et all – nothing is ever their fault is it? Google malignant narcissism. It’s a prime example of the failed US establishment of throwing their toys out of their cots. Bloody disgraceful.

    • George Walsh

      Wow. No proof that Seth Rich leaked anything. you apparently would rather believe a pedophile, fugitive who makes a suggestion with no evidence besmirching the reputation of a young man who is dead and cannot defend himself than listen to the USA intelligence community who agree that it was Russia that hacked the DNC and Podesta emails.!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are a fool! If Assange has proof then reveal it, dammit!

  • ggetaclue

    Your conclusion may be correct BUT… Your headline, however is false and misleading and you need to edit it. Julian Assange has NEVER named his source; other than to say it was NOT a state actor. Assange specifically distanced himself from Murray and specifically stated that Murray does not and is not authorized to speak for Wikileaks. In a recent lengthy radio interview Assange specifically disavows Murray’s claim.

    The closest Assange has ever come to suggesting Seth Rich was the leaker was in a Dutch TV interview shortly after the murder, where a visibly shaken Assange talks about the risks that his sources take and specifically why he won’t name them.

    Your headline is a LIE. How disappointing.

    • George Walsh

      I agree. Headline is a lie. Assange is totally not credible. He is a fugitive from American law hiding in a foreign embassy. Shame that media will allow him to spew his venom as though it were truth and reliable.

      • Klee

        Though we believe everything the accusers of republicans claim? Real people who read both news sources understand the twist quite well. We have it on both sides,; I believe that this is an issue which scares the hell out of the DNC if Assange ever releases the name of the whistleblower. I am certain they have him on a hit list.

      • ggetaclue

        I believe Assange is 100% credible and he and Wikileaks have a 10 year record of flawless accuracy. He is not a fugitive from American law (he hasn’t been charged with any crime in the US.)

        However, the headline to this article is false because in fact Wikileaks has NOT identified its source and has specifically refused to do so.

      • Sarah Silver

        Do you work for the Clinton administration or something?

        • George Walsh

          No, do you? BTW there is no Clinton administration, but, no I do not work for the Clintons or their foundation. I am simply an american citizen. If I may add, the cyber-attack is about more than DNC or RNC or Obama or Trump or Hillary. It is about national security. all americans should be concerned about it, Republican, Democrat, Independent, Green, Progressive, unregistered, all americans.

    • Klee

      And yet, Assange offered 20K reward money for the conviction of Seth Rich’s killer(s).

      • ggetaclue

        The headline is simply false and misleading.

        You are connecting dots that have not been connected by the people involved. As I stated, the author may in fact be correct, however, the headline implies that Wikileaks has identified its source which is 180 degrees from the truth.

        In fact, Assange has repeatedly and consistently explicitly refused to identify WL’s source.

  • Todd Giffen

    They #judged #SethRich #guilty in #blackworld. #NSA knew his guilt. They know where his #killer is #metropolicecoverup #wikileaks @wikileaks

    ObamasWeapon.com has the secrets.. These guys know who do every leak. They know how to do a killing although I am surprised they didn’t use directed energy/biocommunications/psychotronics.

  • mick

    What a high price he paid! What the fuck is Obama smoking? Sanctioning Russia ffs.

    • George Walsh

      Mick, it’s Trump who supporting Russia and Putin. Sanctions are what Obama imposed against Russia. What are you saying? Very unclear.

      • John Van

        Now you’re making accusations. Where is your proof? The Clinton foundation got millions for Hillary’s help in selling US uranium to Russia, now you.

        • GeorgeWalsh

          John Van, proof of what? Trump has been all over twitter and Facebook claiming that Putin is smart, a good guy and not involved in the hacking in spite of the USA intelligence community saying otherwise. And you changing the subject. Try to focus. Thiscdiscussion is not about Clinton foundation, bit if itveas, what proof do you have about yiur alleged millions for utanium?

          • John Van

            You seem way too angry to carry on an intelligent conversation. I was just stating facts which you seem to know nothing about.

          • GeorgeWalsh

            Sorry I came off as angry. Definitely upsets me. Gotta go to work. Have a nice day.

          • John Van

            I think we are all sick of neither side doing what’s best. We need to get rid of the corruption in DC. You have a good day too.

          • mick

            Some proof…

            FBI-DHS ‘Russian Hacking’ Report Begins with Major Caveat https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/f4108d5918fb323bacbff49d2c65886a18056f7dcee4696b34ad330149687aac.jpg

          • GeorgeWalsh

            Link is corrupted.

          • Klee

            Don’t think he has made claim that Putin is “good”. He is smart and a leader, not one I’d like to be under, but I can appreciate that statement. Assange is asserting that Russia is not involved in the hacks, and he is the person in the know. Also is very concerned about the murder of Seth Rich. The DNC had the timing and the opportunity and the reason to kill Seth Rich.

      • mick

        I’m saying Seth Rich paid the highest price to bring the truth to the people, higher even than Snowden, Manning or Assange.
        Russia didn’t have a hand in the ‘leak’ so Obama is shooting at a nonexistent target!

        • GeorgeWalsh

          Mick there is no evidence that Seth Rich was a whistle blower. Even sleazy Julian Assange does not claim that Rich wad the leak. The headline is wrong. Assange says he does not know who leaked the emails. Read the full article and listen to Assange interview.

          • mick

            sleazy Julian Assange … compared to who?

          • GeorgeWalsh

            The guy is a fugitive from the law, hiding in Ecuadorian embassy to avoid being arrested on charges of rape.

          • mick

            Yea and Nelson Mandela spent 27 years in jail… whats your point?
            George W Bush is on the loose as well, not to mention Cheney.
            There is a massive difference between being ‘accused’ and being guilty.

          • GeorgeWalsh

            If he’s innocent why is he hiding? Nelson Mandela? Really? You draw a parallel to Mandela? At least he told the truth and was true to himself. W and Cheney? Again where’s the parallel? War crimes? Fine? They’re not hiding.

          • mick

            Are you for real? Do you think Assange would get a fair trial? And for your education Assange/wikileaks has NEVER been shown to be wrong, everything they have released has proven to be true. So a parallel with Mandela isn’t non sequitur.

          • GeorgeWalsh

            So the United States courts are unfair in your opinion. Why won’t Assange face the charges against him? Trump in 2010 said he (Assamge) should face the death penalty for his actions. Daniel Ellsburg released the Pentagon papers and the courage to remain in the country he loved and was honestly trying to improve. Assange fled and hides. If he’s such a reformer and honest , come out from seclusion. Not credible on the topic of who was the source. Yes the documents are real but Assange is an enemy of the United States and colludes with Snowden who is hiding where? Russia. After first fleeing to China. Fair trial? Why not? They can have legal representation and call their witnesses and provide evidence instead of rumor, innuendo and unsubstantiated insinuations.

          • mick

            How did Chelsea Manning make out? How many people has America tortured to death? Does that make you feel proud?
            You are clearly an American exceptionalist.
            It will be Americans like you who will be the last to see you are part of a declining empire.
            Americas best days are behind it, get over it. How many wars do you have to lose before you get it?
            Guys like Snowden are so courageous compared to people like you.
            America ranks so low by world standards and people like you are living proof why.

          • GeorgeWalsh

            Chelsea Manning stole classified and sensitive documents while in the military and was court-martialed found guilty and was, and i suppose still is imprisoned with opportunity for release. But you knew that i assume. Last comment for the morning. Gotta go to work. But if you want to name names of those tortured to death by the US please provide. Have a nice day.

          • Herbert Dorsey

            George please don’t be so quick to make judgments without knowing all the facts.The CIA has been after Julian Assange for quite a while because he is actively upsetting many of their covert and illegal projects with all the information he puts out on Wiki Leaks, which has proved to be accurate for over a decade. Agents of the CIA set up the so called rape, which has now proven to be false according to the ladies involved, as a means to discredit Assange. If he gets extradited to Sweden, he will then be sent to the U.S. where he will either be killed or sent to prison on trumped up charges. That is why he is holed up in the Ecuadorian Embassy in England. Assange has a policy of not naming his sources to prevent them from being killed. That is why he did not name Seth Rich as a source of information. It would be against his policy. However he did offer a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of the murderer of Seth Rich.

          • Klee

            Thank you, point made beautifully. SEth Rich was also outside of his home for several hours. I wonder how the hit team entered, and “cleaned” his place of evidence before the hit. I would also wonder what he told the bartender (he had conversations with him about his disappointment with the DNC and was an avid fan of Bernie). The murder was tagged a failed robbery very quickly by the DC police. I would hope that Sessions re-opens this case. Likey no viable evidence remains of it though.

          • GeorgeWalsh
          • mick

            So what? ‘accused’ is different to guilty. Aren’t we all presumed innocent till PROVEN guilty? If you look a little harder you will find the alleged victim isn’t all that keen on pursuing the matter.

      • Pete Needham

        Your strident stance brings no one to your side; as a matter of fact you smell like a CIA stooge.

        • GeorgeWalsh

          Ha. So, according to the headline, Julian Assange who says he never reveals sources, or actually he rediculously stated WikiLeaks does not know who its sources are, is now revealing a source? Makes even less credible than ever. Not sure you see the headline above your comment.
          As to your comment, I’ll have to look up definition of stooge. I recall seeing comedy show Three Stooges so i guess you are calling the discussion humorous., or something in tjat vein.

      • Notanotherliberal

        What evidence do you have that Trump supports the Russians or that the Russians are responsible for the leaks that reveal the DNC tried to steal the election for Hillary? You have no evidence.

  • Rick Morrow

    Seth Rich was assassinated by a democrat. Barack Obama claims the authority to murder American citizens on US soil. It would not surprise me if he was involved, along with Hillary Clinton in the conspiracy to murder him. I would like to see a real investigation to take down the perps and bring justice to Seth Rich’s family and the family of whistle-blowers everywhere.

    • George Walsh

      I agree that a real investigation should be made. You have no evidence to suggest that Obama, Hillary or anyone else was involved in the death of Seth Rich. Yes, his family does deserve to know the truth. there is no evidence that Rich was a whistleblower. the mere fact that he worked at DNC does not prove that. An investigation, yes!

  • Herbert Dorsey

    The Russia hacked our election story came out just after the DNC scandal went public. To me it was an obvious attempt by the CIA to deflect public anger away from the DNC misconduct and towards Russia. Hillary Clinton was a “deep cover CIA agent” as documented in books like Victor Thorn’s “Hillary (and Bill)” trilogy and my “CIA: Crime Incorporated of America”. And, the CIA was trying to get Hillary elected. Interestingly, both Victor Thorn and DNC leaker, Seth Rich were murdered.

    • autdrew

      There is a long list of suspicious deaths surrounding the Clintons. Like committed suicide by shooting themselves in the back of the head 3x suspicious

      • George Walsh

        What are you implying? Be specific. What so you mean suspicious deaths?

    • George Walsh

      How do you know Seth Rich murder is connected to Hilary, CIA or hacking of DNC? What evidence do you have? Reveal it!

      • Herbert Dorsey

        A good question. Never accept any story without convincing evidence! I have several reasons for linking Seth Rich’ s murder to the DNC leaks – not hacks. One was the timeing of his murder. It happened just after the Wiki Leaks evidence of DNC misconduct became public. Seth Rich was an employee of the DNC that had legal access to the evidence revealed by Wiki Leaks. Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Craig Murry stated that he obtained the information from someone that had legal access to the information in Washington D.C. and carried it to Julian Assange in Briton. Another reason is that Julian Assange offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the conviction of Seth Rich’ s murderer.

        • GeorgeWalsh

          So just conjecture then, no actual evidence. Timing? How about coincidence? Who did the murder then? CIA? At whose order? Revenge? Makes no sense. Why take that risk when damage is done? So now that Rich is dead Murray can reveal that it was Rich (even if it were someone else) thereby besmerching this young man’s reputation. Really, how many people had legal access to the emails? Offering a reward? How is that evidence? Good cover for the Russians maybe? Throw suspicion elsewhere. A common practice of the guilty. Sorry Herbert yours is just one theory.

          • Herbert Dorsey

            O.K. George. It is a free country. You are entitled to your opinion and I am entitled to mine.

          • GeorgeWalsh

            Very true. Just an opinion. I would welcome some proof. G’nite.

          • Klee

            Some people consider Seth Rich a hero for exposing The DNC trying to discredit the popular candidate Bernie, so Hillary could beat him in the primaries. Unfortunately he paid a huge price for that revelation.

        • Klee

          I wonder what happened to the bartender who was somewhat of a listener to Seth Rich? They come and go regularly in DC. Is he alive today? Did he make some money from his discussions about Bernie and the DNC with Seth Rich?

          • Herbert Dorsey

            I don’t know if this bartender made any money from his story of conversations with Seth Rich. But, the bartender said that Seth Rich was an avid Bernie Sanders supporter and was quite disgusted with the fraudulent means that the DNC used to throw the nomination from Sanders, who was running ahead of Clinton in the later cacuses, over to Hillary Clinton.

          • Klee

            I’ve skimmed the released file on the Russian hacking job and it really does not seem to have any substance to it, only allegations. I know they are saying that they cannot release the TS information to the public, but this is crumbs to the pigeons stuff. The smell factor always goes up for me when John McCain agrees with the left as well. I’ve watched him squiggle his way around a conversation too often to have any respect for the man.
            I hope Trump is just biding his time, not worth looking into as the Russian espionage theory is something we have lived with since WWII. Wonder when the Dems are going to begin their McCarthy trials?

          • Herbert Dorsey

            Don’t worry the CIA is just making up the whole “Russia hacked our election” story. History will prove it to be completely false like so many other stories made up by the CIA, like “Osama bin Laden did 9/11” and Iraq has “weapons of mass destruction”. Unfortunately, another motive for the CIA doing this (beside vilifying Russia and reducing the legitimacy of the Trump Presidency) has just surfaced. Now, because of all the hacking brouhaha, the Department of Homeland Security will be in charge of all future U.S. elections!

          • Klee

            Copied from Newsweek;”The classification was not “a federal takeover, regulation, oversight or intrusion concerning elections in this country,” Johnson said in a statement. “This designation does nothing to change the role state and local governments have in administering and running elections.”

            More power over the people, more bureaucracy, more BS. We will see the manipulation happen from within our country.

          • Klee

            I hope that Ambassador Murray and the bartender are traveling with protection and wary of DNC staffers. The extent they have taken this nonsense of Russian complexity scares me. I honestly didn’t think the DNC was that desperate; murder is one thing, this Russian accusation is “kafkaesque” in the sense of the legal language being used to build up accusations.

  • nonplused

    Seth Rich committed suicide by shooting himself in the back several times and then disposing of the gun, is my guess. (yes, that was sarcasm)

    • autdrew

      They did access the Pentagon and we weren’t told until after the election. Not even the people who had their info compromised were told and we’ve always been prior. It was need to know but I do know that it was bad, very bad, and that that particular opening was plugged, I do not know how long it was open or how many times it was accessed

  • aztex7007

    Unfortunately, we believe Julian before we believe the DNC, Oboma or Hillary.
    Sad situation when you can’t trust the people in charge. Thank God, O will
    soon be gone, Hillary is out and the DNC ? Who know where it will go from
    here but some serious house cleaning needs to take place.

    • George Walsh

      You are a fool to believe the liar, fugitive and pedphile Julian Assange.

      • Art Cane

        George, You’re worse than a fool perpetuating lies about this journalist. Nobody believes you! But what we all want to know is: have you stopped beating your wife yet Georgie?

        • GeorgeWalsh

          Journalist! Ha! That’s a good one. The man is an enemy of the United States, a fugitive and totally not credible. Not lies Artie, facts. He’s hiding out in tbe Ecuadorian embassy to avoid facing charges in the US and rape charges in Sweden. It’s a fact. I’m ignoring your childish remark. Grow up.

      • Robert Papovich

        You keep asking for proof. What proof do you have that Assange is a rapist or a pedophile? He has never been charged with any of crimes for which he has been accused by the media, and by you. The fact is, Julian Assange has never been proven wrong about any statements he has made. So far Wikileaks has been 100% correct about everything. Do you have any evidence or proof that Assange was lying about anything? Talk about blatant hypocrisy!!! Neither the DNC nor Podesta have been able to deny the info coming from Wikileaks concerning the lies, corruption and prejudices including racist, anti-Semite, anti-religious, homophobic and other comments they’ve made. Of course Hillary and Donna Brazil deny even when faced with proof of wrong doing because they obviously have no conscience. They feel no shame or embarrassment when caught in a lie which just shows their true character. Not that John Podesta or Wasserman Shultz are any better, but at least they’re bright enough to know when it’s time to pull up their pants and go home. Assange is not a U.S. citizen so he cannot be guilty of treason. In reality, he is nothing more than a whistle blower. To suggest that he could get a fair trial in the U.S. tells me that you’ve had little or no experience in the so-called justice system. I’ve seen prosecutors conspire with witnesses to lie and falsify evidence in high profile federal cases, get exposed in open court, no coverage by the media and no repercussions from the federal judge. No way in hell Assange could get a fair trial in this country. His only crime, as far a I know, is that he is a reporter who has blown the whistle and exposed corruption. And you won’t believe Assange who has literally subjected himself and his family to seclusion, technically incarceration and the possibility of assassination, with nothing to gain other than the principle of doing what’s right. But, you’re willing to believe the CIA which have proven themselves to be liars by covering Hillary’s ass concerning Ben Ghazi and, according to all reports, the WMDs in Iraq?? Your words, your conclusions and your allegations defy reason, logic and common sense.

        • George Walsh

          Hi Robert. Had to attend to business today so not replying until now. Whew! Where to begin? Ok, charges. Been reported Assange is wanted in Sweden on rape allegations, and the UK arrested him in 2010. He has said he’s afraid that if he leaves the embassy, he could end up being extradited and facing the death penalty in the United States over allegations of revealing government secrets through his site, WikiLeaks. So OK, charged on rape, not actually charged on government documents in US. And, oh yeah, the pedophile accusation is unproven and discredited. Got me there too. That was a misstatement. I take it back.I guess if I were a journalist that would be a lie, huh?
          I do not believe Assange when he says it was not the Russians. He has no credibility on that and that is why I call him a liar. (More on the lieing later.) He would protect Russian hackers. Snowden? I will wait to see what is revealed abut the Russians hacking. My concern is not with the election and whether it hurt Hillary, Brazille, Wasserman-Schultz but rather that a foreign government is hacking private emails and into government servers.
          As to fair trial, the outcome would be challenged as unfair depending on which side one stood. I have certainly seen verdicts that did not seem to add up in my estimation but I know I was not on the jury and have to accept it. Sounds like you have been closer to the darker side of the justice system and I am sure its not without it’s faults. However with all the international support and the media coverage that Assange trial would get it couldn’t get any worse than the OJ trial. Oh wait, maybe it could!
          It’s interesting you categorizing his “seclusion” as self-imposed. In essence that’s technically correct however he sought asylum after being arrested by the UK.
          Yes, he cannot be charged with treason in the US. He is an Australian citizen. Sorry about that. Overstatement on my part. He may be under Federal indictment however that has been denied and is sealed in grand jury. By the way he pled guilty to crimes in australia some years ago, according to Wikipedia.
          So, calling Assange a liar I base on Wikileaks reporting falsely such things as Podesta being involved in satanic cults, Hillary Clinton being associated with a kidnapper and other false reports. As Editor in chief I consider him to be the liar behind such reports. The grievous falsehood (technically I guess its not proven false but is without evidence, so what do you want to call it?) being his insinuation that Seth Rich was murdered because it was he who stole the emails and leaked them. Outrageous! So I call for evidence!
          Assange claims that he (Wikileaks) does not pick the material to leak, just leak what comes to them. I find that hard to believe. Do you not find it strange that the super -hackers of the world only hack DNC emails and Hillary emails? Nothing from RNC. Oh I am sure the retort is the Dems were careless and the RNC is so secure Julian and co. could not hack them. Nonsense.

          Hey, gotta call it a night. No time to touch on CIA and Benghazi. For another day perhaps. Not!
          .

  • Avner Eliyahu Romm
  • George Walsh

    What a sleaze! Julian Solange suggesting, with NO evidence, that Seth Rich was murdered because he provided Wikileaks with the Podesta emails. solange is a pedofile hiding from US by living in an Ecuadorian Embassy. He won’t reveal his source(s) yet intimates that Rich was a source and was murdered for it. The official report of the Police Dept. is that Rich was shot and killed in a robbery attempt. If he has information about the murder, then reveal it, dammit.

  • Jason

    doesnt mean anything that nothing was taken. the robbers often have to fight over the robbery, shoot the victim while he fights back. get scared and run. happens all the time thats why its called a botched robbery

  • Andy Shagman Mfi

    You take good care Seth and up yer bum Assange SKY NEWS claims your on charges,by the way we got your frilly pink knickers and nuddy pictures of PAM now Git before we git you