Wikileaks To Release Evidence That Will Indict Hillary Clinton

Wikileaks vows to release evidence that will indict Hillary Clinton

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has said that he has information that could see Hillary Clinton indicted if he publishes it. 

Assange told ITV that the information Wikileaks are considering publishing about Clinton will see her finally indicted for her crimes. reports:

Expressing concerns in an ITV interview about the Democratic presidential candidate, who he claims is monitoring him, Assange described Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump as an “unpredictable phenomenon”, but predictably, given their divergent political views, didn’t say if he preferred the billionaire to be president.

He was not asked if he supported Green Party candidate Jill Stein, even though she said she would immediately pardon Wikileaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning if elected.

“We have emails relating to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication,” Assange told Peston on Sunday when asked if more of her leaked electronic communications would be published.

About 32,000 emails from her private server have been leaked by Wikileaks so far, but Assange would not confirm the number of emails or when they are expected to be published.

Speaking via video link from the Ecuadorian Embassy in London, Assange said that there was enough information in the emails to indict Clinton, but that was unlikely to happen under the current Attorney General, Obama appointee Loretta Lynch.

He does think “the FBI can push for concessions from the new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment.”

Clinton has been acting like the presumptive Democratic nominee even though votes are still being counted in California after the June 7 primary, Sanders flipped three counties in his favor, and nine superdelegates have dropped the former New York senator.

The former secretary of state pushed for the prosecution of Wikileaks, rather than the global criminals they exposed, and the organization described her as a “war hawk.”

Assange said the leaked emails revealed that she overrode the Pentagon’s reluctance to overthrow sovereign Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in 2011, and that “they predicted the post-war outcome would be what it is, which is ISIS taking over the country.”

The email scandal could become a headache as the race to the White House heats up and the FBI continues to investigate her.

Sworn testimony from officials working in the department revealed that Clinton did not “know how to use a computer to do e-mail,” instead using her Blackberry for official communications.

Clinton’s office was a designated Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF), where the use of wireless devices was not permitted, leading to Clinton leaving her office in order to access emails.

Sensitive information regarding US security was sent to her private server, including information on drone strikes.

Clinton’s use of a private email account came to light in 2013, when a hacker going by the name of Guccifer accessed the email account of her aide Sidney Blumenthal.

  • TxPatriot53

    Talk is cheap, let’s see what you have.

    • Mike Hawk

      Well – if you actually keep up on reading them, they have been more and more damning. Assange has been professional in his work, and had saved the good info for after elections. Don’t worry – Im sure the data will come through these remaining 9 weeks.

      The ones released to this date have been damning, and they are tiny scandals compared to what is saved. Plus – we have the NYPD who issued the threat of release (of evidence) if the FBI did not take the case back (plus the FBI STILL said they have 4 other investigations into the Foundation STILL open). Well, FBI did not take it seriously, and they used it for political fogging before the election. So – we will not only have the possibility of WL, but also NYPD releasing info dealing with sex scandals w/ children, perjury, racketeering, and handfuls of other felonies. The only reason we HAVENT seen it yet is (b/c of the nature of the disgusting garbage) b/c of the DOJ blocking the investigation. That doesnt mean that ANY of that latter stuff was dropped or will be. So, yes – youre correct. Actions will speak louder. Just like we see the actions of these radical Democrats, inciting violence and showing the TRUE colors… like you refer to… with their actions. We see how the Dem side IS STILL a TERRIBLE choice, b/c they cant even keep up with the promises they make – more Obamas essentially. I Think the Dems have solidified the terrible stereotype of Dem conduct – lying and then showing their true colors after the fact. All while they sit and blame everyone involved in scandal, for losing. Not the fact that Americans are tired of their dead family members being used, or illegals coming to vote in this country illegally. Or maybe we are sick of the talk, and are finally basing our actions, on the actions of others who have come together to unite for a cause – not to burn flags, hurt cops and average Americans, and essentially show ACTIONS, of them inciting the most UN-American violence AGAINST Americans.

      Good point – Let us look at the ACTIONS of these groups to understand who they REALLY are. Clearly not Americans fighting for a better America – or one that “includes everyone”, as they claim with words. That is, IF these rioters are even the masses who claim this with word – but show they are not, with actions. Like the many Craigslist ads taken out that coincidentally showed the protests with organized – not organic. Regardless of the “words” people try to use to cover it.

      Too many coincidences. The people are simply tired of these actions.