Hillary Clinton To Be Indicted, Cover-Up Underway

Hillary Clinton To Be Indicted On Federal Racketeering Charges, Cover-up Underway

The Huffington Post removed an article on Sunday afternoon claiming that the FBI plans to indict Hillary Clinton on charges of federal racketeering. 

Journalist Frank Huguenard wrote an article entitled “Hillary Clinton to be Indicted on Federal Racketeering Charges,” which has since been deleted, suggesting that Hillary may be about to be arrested by the FBI.

In the original article, Huguenard says:

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) is a United States Federal Law passed in 1970 that was designed to provide a tool for law enforcement agencies to fight organized crime. RICO allows prosecution and punishment for alleged racketeering activity that has been executed as part of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

Activity considered to be racketeering may include bribery, counterfeiting, money laundering, embezzlement, illegal gambling, kidnapping, murder, drug trafficking, slavery, and a host of other nefarious business practices.

James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.

Initially, Comey had indicated that the investigation into Hillary’s home brewed email server was to be concluded by October of 2015. However, as more and more evidence in the case has come to light, this initial date kept being pushed back as the criminal investigation has expanded well beyond violating State Department regulations to include questions about espionage, perjury and influence peddling.

Here’s what we do know. Tens of millions of dollars donated to the Clinton Foundation was funneled to the organization through a Canadian shell company which has made tracing the donors nearly impossible. Less than 10% of donations to the Foundation has actually been released to charitable organizations and $2M that has been traced back to long time Bill Clinton friend Julie McMahon (aka The Energizer). When the official investigation into Hillary’s email server began, she instructed her IT professional to delete over 30,000 emails and cloud backups of her emails older than 30 days at both Platte River Networks and Datto, Inc. The FBI has subsequently recovered the majority, if not all, of Hillary’s deleted emails and are putting together a strong case against her for attempting to cover up her illegal and illicit activities.

A conviction under RICO comes when the Department of Justice proves that the defendant has engaged in two or more examples of racketeering and that the defendant maintained an interest in, participated in or invested in a criminal enterprise affecting interstate or foreign commerce. There is ample evidence already in the public record that the Clinton Foundation qualifies as a criminal enterprise and there’s no doubt that the FBI is privy to significantly more evidence than has already been made public.

Under RICO, the sections most relevant in this case will be section 1503 (obstruction of justice), section 1510 (obstruction of criminal investigations) and section 1511 (obstruction of State or local law enforcement). As in the case with Richard Nixon after the Watergate Break-in, it’s the cover-up of a crime that will be the Clintons’ downfall. Furthermore, under provisions of title 18, United States Code: Section 201, the Clinton Foundation can be held accountable for improprieties relating to bribery. The FBI will be able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that through the Clinton Foundation, international entities were able to commit bribery in exchange for help in securing business deals, such as the uranium-mining deal in Kazakhstan.

It is a Federal Crime to negligently handle classified information under United States Code (USC) 18 section 1924. It is a Federal Class A Felony under USC 18 section 798. Hillary certified under oath to a federal judge that she had handed over to the state department all of her emails, which she clearly did not. In spite of her repeated statements to the effect that everything that she did with her home brewed email server as Secretary of State was above-board and approved by the State Department, the Inspector General Report vehemently refutes this claim. Hillary refused to be interview by the Inspector General’s office in their investigation, claiming that her upcoming FBI interview took precedent but it seems more likely that Hillary is more concerned about committing perjury or admitting to anything that can be used against her in a court of law.

Hillary Clinton is guilty of exposing classified documents to foreign governments by placing them illegally on her server, of sending and receiving classified documents and conspiring with her staff to circumvent the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by avoiding the use of the State Department run servers. Some of the documents were so highly classified the the investigators on the case weren’t even able to examine the material themselves until they got their own clearances raised to the highest levels.

While there is an excellent cast to be made the Hillary committed treasonous actions, the strongest case the FBI has is charging both Bill and Hillary Clinton as well as the Clinton Foundation of Racketeering. There’s no wonder why it’s taken this long for the FBI to bring forward a recommendation. The rabbit hole is so deep on this one that it has taking dozens of investigators to determine the full extent of the crimes that have been committed. Perhaps the most interesting question here is whether or not the FBI’s investigation will be able to directly link The Clinton Foundation with The Hillary Victory Fund. If this happens, the DNC itself may be in jeopardy of accusations of either being an accomplice or of being complicit in racketeering.

Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit
Original article published on Huffington Post’s website entitled: “Clinton Foundation hit with racketeering lawsuit”

The article link now directs users to a “not found 404” page, after the Huffington Post mysterious took the story down on Sunday.

As news broke of Hillary’s potential indictment, Twitter went into a frenzy with users publicising the story in an attempt to counter the media blackout:

Breitbart attempted to contact The Huffington Post’s media team and senior politics editor Sam Stein, but they did not return requests for comment.

We will keep you updated with this story as it progresses.

  • leoko

    The FBI cannot indict, only the DOJ can

    • WmP

      From the article…..”James Comey and The FBI will present a recommendation to Loretta Lynch, Attorney General of the Department of Justice, that includes a cogent argument that the Clinton Foundation is an ongoing criminal enterprise engaged in money laundering and soliciting bribes in exchange for political, policy and legislative favors to individuals, corporations and even governments both foreign and domestic.”

      • usmc_marine

        We could use a Judge Dredd about no to remove the Clinton’s in a single 15m hearing ending with execution.

  • Tony420

    #BERNIEORBUST #HillaryforPrison #NeverHillary

  • Dick Roux

    Sounds like a Trumpian move. Total BS.

  • Bo
  • Dick Roux
    • Syd Vishus

      Really, Dick? You have to rely on an unreliable source like Snopes…ran by a husband and wife team of DEMOCRATS, with no investigational team…and you can’t use your own common sense to read between the corrupted and heinous lines?? Wake up already…Killary (Bill and their fraudulent charity scam) are as GUILTY as SIN!! Anybody else would have been arrested for TREASON, already…just on her email scandal!! Killary for GITMO 2016!!

      • Liutgard

        They aren’t Democrats. They’re Canadians.

        • MidclassTaxpayr

          Canadian liberals who hired a Muslim writer at the insistence of Barack Obama! I’ve long wondered why every story I checked about Obama through Snopes paints him as lily white, despite the fact that we all know better.

          • Liutgard

            They don’t do things at the insistence of President Obama. And no, we don’t ‘know better’. I think something has colored your view, and it’s not rose-colored.

  • georgebrazil

    The Clinton’s made a deal with the devil a long time ago. And the devil always wants his due. She’ll get what’s coming to her eventually.

  • Pete Morin

    Here’s a novel idea – it was deleted from HuffPo because it was false and defamatory.

    • mivsdaily

      False, maybe. Defamatory? LMAO

      • Pete Morin

        Well…if it’s false, and it pertains to an allegation of criminal activity, it is defamatory as a matter of law.

        • MidclassTaxpayr

          You KNOW that it’s false? How did you acquire such knowledge? Are you “one of them”? Everyone who’s known anything about them since Arkansas knows better than THAT!

        • usmc_marine

          If it looks and feels like a duck…its a Clinton. Our legal system is so flawed and our society is so PC pussies that no one wants to acknowledge the truth. Sheer statistics of Clinton scandals leaves no doubt they are guilty of accusations alone.

    • MidclassTaxpayr

      Oh, don’t be a complete MORON! You’re apparently such a Clinton fan you’re pasted to their rear ends!

      • Pete Morin

        OK, I will speak slowly so that even you can understand:

        First, I despise Clinton, her husband and anyone who counts them as friends.

        However, I also have an abiding respect and appreciation for the importance of authentic, fact-based journalism, and recognize the profound danger to the First Amendment when agenda-driven websites post fake “news” in an effort to mislead the public (or garner clicks). (Spend some time considering that one, it’s a bit complicated for you – it has to do with the difference between fact and opinion.)

        So yah, if it were TRUE that HC is “to be indicted,” I am quite sure that at least ONE other website on the internet would be able to come up with some corroboration of this “breaking” story.

        Because I don’t believe everything I read just because I hope it’s true.

  • Jane

    Good lord, there are no “dark forces” here. HuffPo allows writers (I am one, so I know) to publish stories. If one turns out to be false or without merit, they pull it.

    • MidclassTaxpayr

      Oh, and of course, we ALL know nothing could be wrong with anything the Clintons have done, don’t we! Don’t make me laugh! You Clinton butt kissers are amazingly naïve.

    • templeton

      Sorry your candidate is a lying sack of shit

  • L Garou

    She has so much filth on her filthy Congress compatriots, one might
    envision an open window or a rogue banana peel in her future..

  • ThePrimeDirective

    Pure genius: criminal masterminds of the highest order. That server in the Clinton basement sure made a better “dead drop” than the usual soda can by the side of the road. And you can’t do any better than laundering the payoffs through a bogus charity so the money is untraceable and tax free.

  • Boomer

    The HP article made legal sense to me. I’d add ESPIONAGE (Gross Negligence), DESTRUCTION OF EVIDENCE, and CONSPIRACY to RICO charge and that should be enough to convict even a clinton!

    • MidclassTaxpayr

      It SHOULD be, but they’re such experienced criminals they’d find some way to steer clear of conviction and imprisonment here on the top side of this terrestrial ball. However, they WILL pay in the hereafter.

  • usmc_marine

    GeorgeBrazil: Right on the money. From Bush Sr to Obama to the frustration over Hillary walking free is part of this countries punishment for turning away from God. The Clinton’s are beyond toast but not until they finalize the destruction.

  • dan

    It is incredible how the Clinton true believers can ignore all of the misstatements, many downright deceptive claims and obvious falsehoods their prima Dona can make without even allowing themselves an occasional doubt about her integrity. Do we need a POTUS with so much baggage? I guess they still believe she was dodging sniper fire on their behalf.