Hillary Loses Thousands Of Votes As Wisconsin Recount Backfires

Hillary Clinton loses thousands of votes as Wisconsin recount numbers released

Day 3 of the Wisconsin recount has resulted in Hillary Clinton losing a staggering 18,422 votes, resulting in a huge victory for Donald Trump. 

According to new figures released by the Wisconsin Board of Elections website, Trump has gained a 15,133 increase over Hillary – casting further doubts on her claim that she won the election by the popular vote.

Alexanderhiggins.com reports:

The Wisconsin Board of Elections just posted updated recount results for Day 3 on their recount update page and today’s net changes are much more dramatic.

In the Day 3 recount update, Hillary Clinton has a net total loss of 18,422 votes in from the original count in areas that have been recounted so far.

In contrast, Donald Trump has a net total loss of 3,289 votes from the original count in areas that have been recounted so far.

The resulting total difference is a net change of 15,133 votes in favor of Donald Trump after the completion of the 3rd day of the recount.

These are not final results and the recount is still underway. These counts reflect the difference between the votes counted in the recount verse the votes counted in the original election.

This screen shot below shows the sum of the net total changes for Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton after the 3rd day of the recount.

wisconsin-recount-results-1

In the City of Milwaukee Hillary lost 17,990 votes and Trump lost 1783 votes:

wisconsin-recount-results-2

In the entire county of Milwaukee County Hillary lost 18820 votes and Trump Lost 3534 votes.

wisconsin-recount-results-3

These changes are of course altered but net losses and additions in other precincts.

Unless the official data is in some manner inaccurate or incomplete, this would suggest that 10,000s of thousands of votes are being during the recount process

Coincidentally, Jill Stein has just withdrew her Pennsylvania recount petition claiming she couldn’t afford to posted the 1 million bond required.

Of course that is absolutely false given she has raised nearly $7 million from donors to fund her recount and the withdrawal comes as Trump’s lead in PA has shrunk from 71,000 to 49,000 after officials included overseas and absentee ballots that were originally not included.

The recount in concession effectively ends any chance of the election being overturned in Hillary’s favor unless recount petitions are filed in additional states.

A spreadsheet showing the counts in the screen shot can be downloaded here.

Anyone can reproduce these results as follows from the original spreadsheet using the following method:

  1. Download the Day 3 updates from the Wisconsin Election Board website here.
  2. Insert 3 columns after row N
  3. Label the new columns N – Counted, M Change Trump, N Change Clinton. At this point
    • Column Y will show the recount change for Donald Trump
    • Column Z will show the recount change for Clinton
    • The values in Y and Z will be negative for the entire original vote if the recount hasn’t been completed otherwise it will show the net change from the updated results.
    • We will use column N to double checked recount has been performed to excluded losses that haven’t been counted.
  4. Entire the following formulas in row 3 for each column:
    • N =IF(Q2=””,0,1)
    • M =IF(Q2=””,0,Y2)
    • O =IF(R2=””,0,Z2)
  5. Select in Row 2 select Cells in N, M, and 0 and while holding shift scroll down to the last cells in the sheet and then Choose Fill and Down from the home menu.
  6. Sum the results by adding the following formulas:
    • In cell O3638 enter the formula =SUM(O2:O3637)
    • In cell P3638=SUM(P2:P3637)
  7. Totals should now match the screen shots above.
  • Diggur

    If they’re screwing up the counts this badly, shouldn’t everyone be a little concerned. How do you make 18,000+ mistakes?

    • Dennis Freeland

      See my comment above – I think that he has included over 320 wards for which the data isnt complete. – there is a warning on the Election Commission Website. GIGO …..

    • nooneofconsequence

      It’s called “voter fraud”.

  • Dennis Freeland

    I think that your spreadsheet should exclude rows 1766 to 2100 for Milwaukee – there is a WARNING on the Website “Numbers for the City of Milwaukee do not include absentee ballots, which have not yet been recounted”.

    • nooneofconsequence

      What are you freakin’ talkin’ about? The City of Milwaukee recount has been completed for the votes cast, and this recount has nothing to do with absentee ballot totals. The recount shows MASSIVE voter fraud.

      But you know that, you lying POS.

  • Ambientereal

    It is quite surprising that Hillary wins in all absentee ballots.

  • EnglishGit

    So it was Hilary that tried to defraud their votes then. Useful to know

    • Turd Gobbler

      not necessarily Hillary. Anybody with significant power to commit election fraud who wanted their shill and/or welfare state supplier in office would have worked to cause events like this to happen.

      If the recount actually went through an properly investigated voter fraud and not election fraud, it would be even worse!

      In other words, other people are probably responsible for this and not just Hillary. Lots of Saudi and banker CEO money paid lottts of scumbags within our borders to try to steal this one so that they may have their sellout-in-chief.

      • Hugo Mungus

        Oh it sure is necessarily. Necessarily Hillary stealing votes!

  • Peter Combs

    It’s a totally fake news story…Alexanderhiggins.com is already gone.. Completely bogus report

    • Mask Agee

      It’s not gone as of a few seconds ago.

      • Peter Combs

        It’s back, its a fake story none the less, look at the rest of this guy’s site..it
        s pretty much all ridiculous BS.

        • nooneofconsequence

          I downloaded Wisconsin’s spreadsheet. I analyzed the voting recount data. I agree with this article.

          I have been looking at this every day.

          On day 10 of the recount, Hillary lost 51,457 votes. Trump lost 7,086 votes.

          It appears, from your statement, that your brain is little more that ridiculous BS.

          Sorry to break it to ya.

    • nooneofconsequence

      As Trump would say…”Wrong”

    • nooneofconsequence

      You are a totally fake human being.

  • john pierre smith

    WHERE ALL THE OBAMA TOTALS WERE TOTAL SECRETS…BUT NOT THESE DAYS,,….

  • adrian nunes

    THEY DID THIS EVERYWHERE/IN FLORIDA BROWARD COUNTY IN BACK ROOM WITH ELECTION OFFICIAL BRENDA SNIPES FILLING OUT ABSENTEE BALLOTS FOR DESTROYED ONES—————UNCANVASSED—————-SO EVEN WITH MASSIVE FRAUD TRUMP KICKED ASS

  • logiclady

    Where is the Jill Stein net change? Isn’t SHE the one who supposedly was concerned?

  • Turd Gobbler

    it should be noted that the absentee ballots which were originally counted in the Wisconsin City lists are now counted separately and were not yet counted as of this list. In other words, the article author is making a false inference in claiming massive Wisconsin City voter fraud. Sorry to break it to y’all.

  • http://royalecraig.com/ Ade

    Can’t they count ? how can they be out by that many.

  • nooneofconsequence

    I am not shocked that there is fraud in Milwaukee…I am not shocked that the Left-leaning media has not reported on the running status of the evidence (from the State of Wisconsin’s own data!) of massive voter fraud. I know what the media will say to excuse this: “Although the results were reported, the results had not yet been certified, so we felt it would have been irresponsible for us to have reported uncertified results.”

    Really?

    If the recount had been going badly for Trump it would have been Trumpeted (had to do that) endlessly…everyone knows that, or should.

    Just another shovel full as the Media digs its grave. Anymore, I just look at the media for a laugh.