Latest

Obama Calling For German Military Support To Fight Russia

Russia

President Obama has asked NATO ally Germany to actively deploy troops along NATO’s eastern borders near Russia.

The West is afraid of a Russian invasion of Europe based on Russia’s annexation of Crimea. NATO is expanding eastwards because of it, giving the Russian’s a legitimate reason to fear an invasion.

Russia saw the Ukrainian conflict from the start as an attempt by the west to destabilize the region and encroach upon Russian interests. Russia annexed Crimea as a counter measure to western encroachment and put up its guards by drawing a red line in the sand.

People might ask why are the Russians afraid? What’s the big deal? The deal was made before the Berlin Wall came down and was a promise made to former Soviet leader Gorbachev by NATO not to deploy along Russia’s borders.

A war between the superpowers could be inevitable if the fear and misunderstanding is not resolved soon. The battle between capitalism and communism is now over and the new battle is for resources and territories. Nuclear weapons have been kept on standby for over 70 years and are part of the arsenal of both sides. Weapons of mass destruction could be unleashed by either side at any time during a conflict between NATO and Russia.

Russia Insider reports: Obama Requests Military Support for Possible War Against Russia
The Nobel Peace Prize winner

According to an April 23rd article carried by Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten (German Economic News), U.S. President Barack Obama is “demanding the active deployment of the Bundeswehr [Germany’s armed forces, including their Army, Navy, and Air Force] to NATO’s eastern borders” at Poland and the Baltic republics, to join the quadrupling of America’s forces there, on and near the borders of Russia. This is an extreme violation of what Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to when he ended the Soviet Union and its NATO-mirror organization the Warsaw Pact, but it’s actually culminating a process that began shortly after he agreed to America’s terms, which included that NATO “not move one inch to the east.”

Furthermore, DWN reports that on April 25th, the U.S. President will hold a summit meeting in Hannover, Germany with the leaders of Germany (Angela Merkel), Italy (Matteo Renzi), France (Francois Hollande), and Britain (David Cameron). The presumed objective of this meeting is to agree to establish in the NATO countries bordering on Russia a military force of these five countries, a force threatening Russia with an invasion, if or when NATO subsequently decides that the ‘threat from Russia’ be ‘responded to’ militarily.

NATO’s encirclement of Russia with forces hostile to it is supposedly defensive — not an offensive operation — against Russia and is presented as such by our media.   During the 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis,  J. F. Kennedy didn’t consider Nikita Khrushchev’s plan to base nuclear missiles in Cuba to be ‘defensive’ on the USSR’s part — and neither does Russia’s President Vladimir Putin consider America’s far bigger operation of surrounding Russia with such weapons to be ‘defensive’.  The U.S. government, and NATO, act as if Russia is threatening them rather than them threatening and encircling Russia — and their news media transmit this lie as if it were a truth and one worthy of being taken seriously.  In actual fact, NATO has already expanded right up to Russia’s western borders.encirclement_0_3

Obama is thus now adding to the economic sanctions against Russia that he had imposed because of Russia’s alleged ‘seizure’ of Crimea from Ukraine after the US and EU engineered coup overthrew Russia’s ally Viktor Yanukovych who had led Ukraine until the coup in February 2014.

Even though Western-sponsored polls in Crimea, both before and after the coup, had shown higher than 90% support by Crimeans for rejoining with Russia, right after Crimeans voted overwhelmingly to rejoin Russia, Obama slapped sanctions against Russia. Nuclear weapons were prepared, both on the U.S.-EU side and on the Russian side, for a possible nuclear war.

This is no mere restoration of the Cold War (which was supposedly based on the capitalist-communist ideological disagreement); it’s getting forces into position for a possible invasion of Russia, pure-and-simple — raw conquest — though no major news-media in the West are reporting it as being such.

The current preparation doesn’t necessarily mean a nuclear war will result from them. Russia might accept whatever the demands ‘the West’ makes of it and thus lose its  sovereignty.  Alternatively, if Russia stands-its-ground and refuses to yield up its national sovereignty,‘the West’ (the U.S.leadership, and the leaderships in its allied countries) could cease with its evermore-ominous threats and simply withdraw from Russia’s borders.

Basically, by 2013 the U.S. leadership had decided to take over Ukraine and refused to acknowledge the rights of the Crimean people to reject the new dispensation in Kiev and decide on its own future — and, by late February 2014, Russia’s leadership decided to protect them against the type of invasion that subsequently occurred in Ukraine’s former Donbass region, where the opposition to Obama’s coup was even more intense.

The West keeps asserting that Russia is somehow in the wrong here.  However, since even the head of Stratfor has called what Obama did in Ukraine “the most blatant coup in history”, and since the fact that it was a U.S. coup has been documented extensively on cellphone and other videos, and in the most thorough academic investigation that has been performed of the matter — and was even acknowledged by Ukraine’s Petro Poroshenko, a participant in the coup, to have been a coup — and since evidence survives on the Internet of the U.S. Embassy’s preparations as early as 1 March 2013 for the February 2014 coup; and since even the U.S. government’s hired polls showed that Crimeans rejected overwhelmingly the U.S. coup and supported rejoining Russia; the question still needs to be answered: What is the basis of the West’s aggressive actions threatening Russia’s national security other than its own imperialist ambitions towards Russia camouflaged with the lies about an aggressive Russia and an aggressive President Putin the Western mass media have been bombarding the public with?  And, that’s a very worrisome basis — worrisome regarding, essentially, a type of dictatorship in the West, rather than any dictatorship outside it.   The aggression and the threat here seem clearly to be coming from the West, against the East.

Back in January, Russian President Vladimir Putin had once again called out American President Barack Obama on Obama’s big lie that America’s “ABM” weapons to disable in-flight nuclear missiles were being installed in Europe in order to protect Europe against Iranian nuclear missiles.  Now, however, while the U.S. acknowledges that Iran doesn’t have, and won’t have, any nuclear missiles, Obama is stepping up (instead of ending) those same ABM installations in Europe, close to Russia’s borders.  The only real reason they have been installed, as Putin argues, is in order to enable a sudden nuclear attack against Russia capable of disabling Russia’s retaliatory capacity in a matter of minutes.

The only rational response by the Western public to what Obama and his foreign allies are doing is to recognize what is actually happening and to take action against their own leaders, before this increasingly high-stakes confrontation becomes terminal.  In this instance, the people of the countries that comprise the political West need to defend themselves against their own national leaders. This is a situation that is frequently encountered in dictatorships.

The key questions are not being asked in the Western press, however; they are being ignored by it.  Unless these questions are publicly dealt with — and soon — the answer to them all could well be terminal for millions of civilians in Europe and elsewhere.
The closer things get to a nuclear war, the more difficult it is for either side to back down from it — and this is especially the case with the aggressor, most especially when it falsely claims that it is being aggressed-against.

This is the reason why the lies peddled by the political leadership of the West urgently need to be exposed.

By Eric Zuesse

About Edmondo Burr (2944 Articles)
BA Economics/Statistics CEO Assistant Editor
  • frank kodadek

    Whilst the overall number of overseas military bases has fallen since 1945, the United States, United Kingdom, France and Russia still possess a substantial number. Smaller numbers of overseas military bases are operated by China, India, Japan, Italy, and Turkey. The United States is the largest operator of overseas military bases, with as many as 662 sites in 38 countries in 2010 We are a warlike country…George Carlin

    • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

      Try 200 countries…

      • Christopher

        200??? Wow!

  • Avner Eliyahu Romm
  • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

    Mr. communist usurper Obama is a war criminal and head of the U.N. security council which oversees Russia.

    They’re all in on the worldwide population reduction pit military Muslim/Christian men and women against each other. In the Rothschild end game they all end up dead except the Rothschild/Nazi dynasty.

    • Christopher

      The UN Security Council includes 5 permanent members, also known as the Permanent Five, Big Five, or P5, and are China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The UN Security Council does not “oversee Russia.”

      • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

        You’re incorrect about Russia and I can prove it too… The U.N. charter was authored by a communist, the first
        U.N. Secretary-general was a communist, and the U.N., from the
        beginning, was designed to be a Union of World Socialist Republics.http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/un_doesnt_want_you_to_know.htm

        • Christopher

          Sorry…..this doesn’t constitute proof. I do not see anything in my message that would lead you to say I am wrong about Russia. I did not make any pronouncements about Russia except to say but the United Nations Security Council does not control Russia. Don’t forget there are five permanent members of the Security Council.

          • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

            What proof don’t you understand is; they’re all in on the U.N. communist conspiracy. I quote what you claim is wrong:

            In view of the fact that these three functions may
            soon constitute the ultimate power of life and death over every human being on the face of the earth (once national disarmament is achieved and all military is under the control of the U.N.), there would appear to be some minor justification for us to be more than passingly curious over who wields this power.

            Since the United Nations was created in 1945 there have been fifteen men appointed to the position of undersecretary-general of political and security council affairs. Astonishingly, every single one of
            them has been a communist!

            Communists appointed to the position of
            undersecretary-general
            Arkady Sobolev–USSR (1946-1949)
            Konstantin Zinchenko—USSR (1949-53)
            Ilya Tehernychev—Ygoslavia (1954-1957)
            Anatoly F. Dobrynin—USSR (1958-1960)
            Georgi Ptrovich Arkadev—USSR (1960-1962)
            Eugeny Dmiterievich Kiselev—USSR (1962-1963)
            Vladimir Pavolovich Suslov—USSR (1963-1963)
            Alexie E. Nesterenko—USSR (1965-1968)
            Leonid N. Kutakov—USSR (1968-1973)
            Arkady N. Shevchenko—USSR (1973-1978)
            Mikhail D. Sytenko—USSR (1978-1981)
            Viacheslav A. Ustinov—USSR (1981-1986)
            Uasiliy S. Safronchuk—USSR (1987-1992)
            Vladimir Petrovsky—Russia , “former USSR (1992-)
            James O. C. Jonah—Sierra Leone (Co-chairman)

          • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

            Mr. Mitch you sound intelligent? But irrational? You’re wrong about Russia period and that’s a prima facie fact. Your job as a cointelpro agent is to squash the truth.

        • Christopher

          Oh, you forgot these soviet communists who also run the Dept of Political Affairs!

          B. Lynn Pascoe – 2007-2012
          Ibrahim Gambari – 2005-2007
          Kieran Prendergast
          1998-2005
          Marrack Goulding – 1993-1998
          Not everything is a conspiracy!

        • Christopher

          Interesting reading but not proof.

          • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

            Not proof, is an opinion. Since when is proof not proof? You’re entitled to your opinion but not your own facts.

  • Christopher

    The US needs Russia now more than ever. The likelihood that anything dumb like this will happen is close to nil.
    Sorry, not a well-researched article.

  • C.J.

    We wil have a 3 World War. Thank you Obama