Latest

The Coincidental Lost And Found IDs In Terror Cases

A recurring theme major terror incidents in the western world is that authorities often very quickly find the perpetrators IDs shortly after the attack. Whether its through an error on the terrorists side or through a lucky coincidence, time and time again authorities are able to quickly identify those responsible for the attack by discovering ID near the scene of the crime.

The recent Paris attacks saw one of the alleged perpetrators, Said Kouachi, leave his ID card behind in an abandoned getaway vehicle.  “It was their only mistake,” Dominique Rizet, police and justice consultant for CNN-affiliate BFMTV, opined.

Said-Kouachis-ID-card

It seems like a careless mistake to make considering he went to the trouble of hiding his identity by wearing a mask during the attacks.

Whowhatwhy.org reports:

Intriguingly, such apparent gaffes have marked other watershed violence. Consider these examples, and draw your own conclusion:

The Bundle of James Earl Ray: The accused killer of Martin Luther King escaped from a prison shortly before the attack, and left several items on the sidewalk near the assassination site—in a bundle that included his rifle, binoculars, clothing, his prison radio, and a newspaper clipping revealing where King would be staying.

Bundle-of-evidence-dropped-by-James-Earl-Ray.

Bundle of evidence dropped by James Earl Ray.

The Wallet of Lee Harvey Oswald: The alleged assassin of John F. Kennedy and killer of Officer J.D.Tippit purportedly dropped his wallet, which was found at the scene of Tippit’s murder. To some, this appeared a little too neat. In any case, original law enforcement reports with this scenario were almost immediately replaced by another version: that the police took the wallet from him after he was arrested. (See “Assignment: Oswald” by former FBI agent James P. Hosty.)

Oswald’s-military-ID-said-to-have-been-stained-by-FBI-fingerprinting-fluid.-300x203

Oswald’s military ID, said to have been stained by FBI fingerprinting fluid.

Contents-of-Oswalds-wallet.-300x200

Contents of Oswald’s wallet.

The Visa of Satam al-Suqami: This identify document of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers somehow survived unscathed a few blocks from the twin towers, though the plane itself was virtually obliterated.

Visa-belonging-to-Satam-al-Suqami-300x212

Visa belonging to Satam al-Suqami

The Passports belonging to Ziad Jarrah and Saeed al-Ghamdi: The passports of two alleged hijackers of United Airlines Flight 93 supposedly survived the fiery crash in Pennsylvania that left the aircraft itself charred and widely scattered—with one passport entirely intact.

Remains-of-Ziad-Jarrahs-visa.-300x201

Remains of Ziad Jarrah’s visa.

Passport-of-Saeed-al-Ghamdi

Passport of Saeed al-Ghamdi

  • Michael Waters

    All these amazing “coincidences” point to the fact that for every attack there is a pre-designated PATSY who may have also been previously lured into being a minor player in the plot (similar to the dolts occasionally entrapped by the FBI, but on a much larger scale), but who is mainly someone the CIA can, with adequate credibility, pin the attack on. Thus, authorities conveniently stumble onto “incriminating evidence,” which in turn sends everyone off looking in the wrong directions.

    The biggest example is likely Bin Laden. As far as I can tell, 911 was an inside job with Bin Laden the equivalent of Lee Harvey Oswald, who I suspect was lured into the assassination plot of JFK, but who was strictly a basically innocent patsy. Which is why Jack Ruby, a CIA operative along with being a seedy strip club operator, was tasked with quieting Oswald, who certainly might have been able to articulately defend himself.

    Similarly, Bin Laden, who originally denied involvement with 911, was the chosen patsy for 911. This general tactic allows the real perps, like henchmen for the Deep Government, who are usually cordoned off components of the CIA, to avoid detection by the masses.

    in this sense, men like Clarke could be gatekeepers tasked with keeping people focused on al Qaida and Bin Laden instead of aspects within our own government who didn’t just allow 911, but were behind it’s execution.

    In other words, the CIA, doing what it does well, will set up potential patsies to be vaguely involved in a plot, but the actual perps will be the CIA, with the patsies waiting in the wings to be suddenly “discovered” to have been behind the attack.

    At least that’s my latest working theory after researching 911 for fourteen years.

    One thing for certain, the Official Story is patently false.