United Nations Forced To Investigate Democratic Election Fraud

American citizens concerned about Democratic election fraud and voter suppression have launched a petition to the UN requesting emergency electoral monitoring and supervision for the remainder of the 2016 presidential election cycle.

American citizens concerned about Democratic election fraud and voter suppression have launched a petition to the UN requesting emergency electoral monitoring and supervision for the remainder of the 2016 presidential election cycle.

A letter that will be delivered with the petition to the UN Electoral Assistance Division (EAD) says that the integrity of the electoral process in the US has been compromised in order to place an undemocratically chosen candidate in power, and points out the massive discrepancies between exit polls and official results – more than enough to have foreign elections declared fraudulent.

Upon receipt of the petition, the EAD will be legally obliged to acknowledge and investigate the allegations.  With lawsuits, university studies, hacked documents, and now the United Nations hounding Clinton, no wonder Bernie Sanders is quietly confident of winning the contested Democratic convention in Philadelphia.

The letter reads:

We the people of the United States of America are officially requesting the United Nations to monitor our remaining 2016 presidential election. So far we have seen evidence of massive election fraud all across the country, which gives us reason to believe that the fraud will continue. Our president Barack Obama and the U.S. State Department have done nothing about the obvious rigging of our elections, which gives us reasonable suspicion that our government and the integrity of our electoral process has been compromised in order to place their chosen candidate in power against the will of the American people.

The U.S. State Dept. says that a discrepancy in exit polls of more than 2% indicates fraud, we have had discrepancies outside of that margin in at least 16 of the state primaries all the way up to a discrepancy of 23%. These discrepancies have only happened in one of our political parties and they have all been in favor of one candidate. On top of the exit poll discrepancies there has been reports of ballots cast in the names of deceased citizens, patients of mental hospitals, and elderly people with dementia. There has been reports of registration purging, switching of party affiliations, vote flipping, and massive voter suppression. Not to mention the millions of voters who have not been allowed to vote because they do not claim any party affiliation. Multiple major universities have calculated that in order to get our current results without election fraud, the odds would be 1 in 70 billion.

This level of election fraud is usually only done covertly and in 3rd world countries, now it’s being done openly and blatantly in the United States. Our democracy is being stolen and we very well maybe on the brink of a dictatorship, we can no longer trust our government and we need help from the outside. So we are respectively requesting the U.N. to step in and assess the integrity of our electoral process. We also request that you review the apparent fraud of our current results and ensure credibility and transparency moving forward. We feel that your help is imperative to avoid an inevitable major conflict in the U.S. due to corruption in our government.

According to the UN Electoral Assistance Division, the premise of their work is Article 21 (3) of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which says: “The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections.”

Is the will of the people forming the basis of the authority of government in the United States now?

The United Nations has provided several kinds of assistance to countries during elections:

  • technical assistance
  • election monitoring
  • organisation and supervision of elections

Does the Unites States need technical assistance, election monitoring and supervision of this election?

The petetion to the UN Electoral Assitance Division can be found here.

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry

Baxter Dmitry is a writer at Your News Wire. He covers politics, business and entertainment. Speaking truth to power since he learned to talk, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one. Live without fear.
Email: baxter@yournewswire.com
Follow: @baxter_dmitry
Baxter Dmitry
  • commonlaw

    wtf-??? un? misdirected ??

  • p. ruotolo

    The headline is fraud.

    • David Tokio

      I would say SPIN is the appropriate word for this headline.

      • Vapeman

        No its Fruad, the United Nations has no Nations and is not United.

        It is a Private Corporation chartered in New York City, New York.
        That is all it is.

  • Thomas Milligan

    UN hasn’t actually done anything…..

    • Nibor

      The UN hasn’t been asked to do anything. Just some complaining the election results aren’t the results they want. Hopefully they can get the UN involved where they know how to get desired election results.

      • Tina Marie Deraco

        Excuse me? Do you understand the ramifications of these charges and the multitudes of lawsuits being filed? “Complaining” for results is not at issue: rigging, fraud, suppression & other illegalities are. Independent agencies are already prepared to prove Bernie won the primaries and that the media assisted in the corruption. RICO charges will be filed all the way around. If your concern is about “complaints over desired results, you have nothing to worry yourself about. Your criminal candidate might only lose due to indictment.

        • Nibor

          “Do you understand the ramifications of these charges”
          Of course, things didn’t go your way. Proving them is yet another matter but the UN usually doesn’t worry itself much over such niceties.

          “Your criminal candidate might only lose due to indictment.”
          Which candidate might that be?

          • PGURRIERI

            Next question mighty GM0aTiZED Julian Caesar Crusader of
            “G0D*KJB*NRA” protectorate of the “Ghost*G0D*Corporations”…

          • Ermumm

            When people refer to criminal there is only Hilary, although Google executive is bought out by Clinton. Using other search engine may lead you to the more searched result, as if you search Hilary Crime in Google it show you her crime reform, whereas every other search engine shows her criminal record and possible charges. Rather than the result that executive and the 1% want you to see. So just look up Hilary crime on Bing or google. I quoted a circulating jokes with topic that you can all search up individually with very famous headline/articles on each.

            Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are in a bar. Donald leans over, and With A smile on his face, says, “The media is really tearing you apart for That Scandal.”
            Hillary: “You mean my lying about Benghazi?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “You mean the massive voter fraud?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “You mean the military not getting their votes counted?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Using my secret private server with classified material to Hide my Activities?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “The NSA monitoring our phone calls, emails and everything Else?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Using the Clinton Foundation as a cover for tax evasion, Hiring Cronies, And taking bribes from foreign countries?
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “You mean the drones being operated in our own country without The Benefit of the law?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Giving 123 Technologies $300 Million, and right afterward it Declared Bankruptcy and was sold to the Chinese?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “You mean arming the Muslim Brotherhood and hiring them in the White House?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Whitewater, Watergate committee, Vince Foster, commodity Deals?”
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “The funding of neoNazis in the Ukraine that led to the toppling of the democratically elected president and to the biggest crisis that country has had since WWII ?”
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Turning Libya into chaos?”
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Being the mastermind of the so-called “Arab Spring” that only brought chaos, death and destruction to the Middle East and North Africa ?
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Leaving four Americans to die in Benghazi and go to sleep?
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Trashing Mubarak, one of our few Muslim friends?”
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Encouraging and supporting the murders of Palestinians and the destruction of their homes, towns and villages by Israel ?”
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “The funding and arming of terrorists in Syria, the destruction and destabilization of that nation, giving the order to our lapdogs in Turkey and Saudi Arabia to give sarin gas to the “moderate” terrorists in Syria that they eventually used on civilians, and framed Assad, and had it not been for the Russians and Putin, we would have used that as a pretext to invade Syria, put a puppet in power, steal their natural resources, and leave that country in total chaos, just like we did with Libya?
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “The creation of the biggest refugees crisis since WWII
            Trump: “No the other one:”
            Hillary: “Leaving Iraq in chaos? ”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “The DOJ spying on the press?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “You mean HHS Secretary Sibelius shaking down health insurance Executives?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Giving our cronies in SOLYNDRA $500 MILLION DOLLARS and 3 Months Later they declared bankruptcy and then the Chinese bought it?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “The NSA monitoring citizens’ ?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “The State Department interfering with an Inspector General Investigation on departmental sexual misconduct?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Me, The IRS, Clapper and Holder all lying to Congress?”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “Threats to all of Bill’s former mistresses to keep them quiet”
            Trump: “No, the other one.”
            Hillary: “I give up! … Oh wait, I think I’ve got it! When I stole the White House furniture, silverware, when Bill left Office?”
            Trump: “THAT’S IT! I almost forgot about that one”.

          • http://www.scoutbuffalowebdesign.com drastikk

            While I have heard of, and am not surprised by, Google showing bias to Hillary, a Google search result of “Hillary crime” does show content that is negative toward Hillary.

          • mdwight

            Maybe if Hillary had been convicted of (or even charged with) a crime Google might supply different results. For the same reason a Google search result of “Patrick Ewing championship” does not show content that proves he won an NBA title

          • mdwight

            You win stupidest comment! Hillary Clinton doesn’t HAVE a criminal record. While you’re at it, Google “Charles Barkley Championship” & see if his NBA titles come up.

            And a moronic list of wild accusations is just that. A MORONIC LIST OF WILD ACCUSATIONS! Please post evidence to support any of them. Can’t? Oh, right, there is none!

          • Tasheena

            Hillary Clinton. How she is not in prison or jail yet is a mystery to us all.

          • Elaine Christian

            Investigations all over, and not an ounce of proof of her doing anything wrong! A witch hunt for modern times is all this is.

          • OneWitness

            Well, if you look into it, you’ll find that Hillary is, in fact, a witch from Wellesley.

          • **theRightWay

            Try and pull your head out of your ass. There is plenty proof. Why do you think Debbie Wasserman Schultz was fired?

          • OneWitness

            The “mystery” is Obama. He’s able to give her “a pass,” which he has already done verbally. She won ‘t be able to be imprisoned until TRUMP gets elected!

          • Di

            It has already been proven there was massive election fraud and you know it. A Harvard lawyer is at the head of it.

          • Nibor

            How did a Harvard lawyer get involved in election fraud?

        • Vapeman

          Yes, he does. Apparently, you are already brain dead if you think the PRIVATELY OWNED United Nations gives a fuck about you.

        • Elaine Christian

          I would love for the UN to step in and put a stop to the lies about rigging the election. But just you wait, when they say Hillary wins fair and square, the Bernie folks will join Trump in denouncing the United Nations as bought and paid for by Hillary. It’s not even a matter of if, but when!

        • Mjd

          The US uses the UN to do its bidding, then UN will not be allowed into the US, much less investigate it. That’s just how things work.

      • http://richardhughes.ca/ Richard Hughes

        As the US controls the UN it is unlikely that they will act in a timely fashion, if at all.

        • Magdalene

          We don’t have to worry about it now. The Institute For American Democracy and Election Integrity has already proven that Bernie Sanders won the Democratic primaries and that there was election rigging; along with corruption through the media. They have filed lawsuits and RICO charges. Check out http://www.trustvote.org and on 6/30/16 they will present a mini documentary about the election fraud that took place in CA on June 7 and the lawsuits that have been filed. To get info, go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-q2PCdRodys

  • Rixar13


  • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

    The communist U.N. orchestrates worldwide voter fraud. As the U.N. they should also request a fox to guard their hen house?

    • Gregory J. Gonzales

      Now, Jimmy. If you didn’t study, please go read in the corner while the rest of the class participates in discussion.

    • http://laniakeasblog.blogspot.com/ Laniakea Official

      You’re an imbecile honestly.

    • PS45


      • http://jamessssmith.com/2015/04/04/john-woodman-an-epilogue/ James Smith

        I’ve failed to see the humor in Christian genocide.

  • it’s just me, but . . .

    Be nice if it were true – but the totally FALSE headline makes the entire article suspect. I call bullshit.

  • VD65

    The petition is real. I signed it long before I saw this article. As to whether it does anything, that is another issue. Headlines are always bigger than life to get the readers attention. I don’t know if they have received the petition as yet. They have to get a certain number of people on it I believe.

    • michaelstumpf

      I signed it too.

      • Mike

        Me too.We have to do something and aside from violence this is our only recourse.

  • http://laniakeasblog.blogspot.com/ Laniakea Official

    I signed, but the article is misleading. Anyway, the UN declaration of rights wasn’t signed by the US anyway.

  • http://www.facebook.com/AvangionQ AvangionQ

    That will blow this democratic primary election fraud wide open!

  • Bobs_Vendetta

    I signed it a little while back. I would love to see the world. in effect, cite Clinton as illegitimate.

    • Elaine Christian

      The majority of Democrats voted for Hillary, and sneaky attempts to steal the nomination for an outside Independent have not worked. We are choosing a nominee to represent us Democrats, and it is not an election.

  • mindtrapper

    UN has zero to do with U.S. elections… What really needs to be monitored is the Nov elections… but by somebody that can actually do something about it….

    Because I guarantee you the “fix” is already in for Hillary Clinton… She’s owned by the Muslim Brotherhood and is Obama’s puppet for him stopping her indictment…

    But pay attention to whom Obama picks as her running mate…Hillary might have an attack of the “Scalia” sickness.

    • Tina Marie Deraco

      LOL! Are you kidding me? Have you ever heard the name Rothschilds? You are giving the president more power than he has. Do some reading.

    • Elaine Christian

      How asinine!! And condescending!! Those who favor the patriarchy are threatened by a woman and can’t even credit her with choosing her own VP. You are making sure to credit all the power to males, even terrorists as long as they are men. We have a lot of work to do to fix this patriarchal obsession.

  • Pat Engness


  • Frank Shopen


    • Teddyx

      In the first paragraph, and again in the last paragraph

  • Teddyx

    In the first paragraph, and again in the last paragraph.

  • Dajoenie

    Hillary failed to slant it herself, bringing in the UN to help doesn’t seem like a good idea. I can see this going both ways.

  • Dajoenie

    Lets ask Canada to help.

    • Vapeman

      Call the Zombie Clean Up Crew. This one is already dead.

  • BourrasqueDeNeige

    Respectively? Really? I think they meant respectfully.

  • Jeanette Wishall

    According to poll workers, voters, and election officials in Arizona, New York, Kentucky, California, and more… Yes. The United States needs the assistance of the U.N. to monitor elections and provide technical assistance.
    I signed the petition.

    • Vapeman

      Fuck the UN, Lets Return to Paper Ballots protected by We the People and our Liberty Rifles aka, Machine Guns.

      Besides, the United Nations is nothing more than a small, private Corporation held in Charter in New York City New York. It is not a group of Nations, but a group of Private Bankers and Business Men, and Kings and Queens. And that is a group YOU’RE NOT IN.

      • Di

        the establishment does not paper ballots because it would be more difficult to cheat

  • Beth Clarkson

    Yes, we need this. We use non-transparent and non-secure voting equipment in most states. We cannot trust the official reported results. http://www.ShowMeTheVotes.org

  • http://kbascott.com Kenneth Scott

    The system by which candidates are nominated by their own parties, are not actually democratic elections. They are nothing more than glorified polls, their rules are dictated by the party leadership. The vote of the rank and file party members isn’t even binding. The U.N. has no business getting involved in this process. Ultimately the party will put forth the candidate that their leadership feel has the best chance to win the actual election. Just because people cast ballots does not make it an election.Study up on the U.S. electoral college and you’ll find that not even in the Nov election are delegates required to cast their votes according to the result of the popular vote, they do so only by custom. The system has been rigged from the start to make the voice of the people meaningless, that is why the U.S.A. is termed a republic and not a democracy…

    • A.b. Eberly

      We are a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy and also not just a republic as there are differences with our major difference being that our founding fathers wrote a Constitution which laid down rights for the citizens and put limitations on how far the government could go when considering new laws and that would keep them honest for a little while but the founders new that power corrupts and that is why they put the most important thing in the Constitution”the 2nd Amendment”. Without it all our other rights and just laws and the Constitution would cease to exist and we would no longer be a free people. Damn those founding fathers were smart.

      • Francisco Estrada

        Can I use your comment

  • Vapeman

    Fuck the UN, Lets Return to Paper Ballots protected by We the People and our Liberty Rifles aka, Machine Guns.

    Besides, the United Nations is nothing more than a small, private Corporation held in Charter in New York City New York. It is not a group of Nations, but a group of Private Bankers and Business Men, and Kings and Queens. And that is a group YOU’RE NOT IN.

  • Sink Chicken

    The UN is a body of unelected parasites and has no authority in the affairs of the United States.

  • Larry Miller

    Great maybe there will be justice after all.

  • John Katz

    The UN? Is there a more powerless or pathetic organization? At this point, it’s basically just a mouthpiece for dictatorships. The UN sits silently as dictators worldwide massacre their own people, and then seats them on the so-called “Human Rights Council.”

  • Jack_Carter_USA

    You lost. Get over it.

  • Dajoenie

    With our currant level of technology, we need to go by popular vote across the board. Not a technological fantasy, this is VERY do’able. A secure popular vote from the privacy of your own Computer.

  • Fred_O

    So, they haven’t been “forced” to do anything. They’ve been given a petition.

  • The Omnivore