German Supreme Court Rules Measles Does Not Exist

German supreme court rules that Measles does not exist

Judges at the German Federal Supreme Court have confirmed that the measles virus does not exist, vindicating conspiracy theorists who have said that no study has ever proven the existence of the virus.

According to the judgement by the Supreme Court, the measles vaccination may have been injected into millions of unsuspecting German citizens for sinister reasons.

Anonhq.com reports:

The First Civil Senate of the BGH has confirmed the judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (OLG) of the 16 February 2016. The sum of €100,000 which I had offered as a reward for scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus does not have to be paid to the plaintiff. The plaintiff also was ordered to bear all procedural costs.

Five experts have been involved in the case and presented the results of scientific studies. All five experts, including Prof. Dr. Dr. Andreas Podbielski who had been appointed by the OLG Stuttgart as the preceding court, have consistently found that none of the six publications which have been introduced to the trial, contains scientific proof of the existence of the alleged measles virus.

Genetics falsifies thesis of existence

In the trial, the results of research into so-called genetic fingerprints of alleged measles virus have been introduced. Two recognised laboratories, including the world’s largest and leading genetic Institute, arrived at exactly the same results independently.The results prove that the authors of the six publications in the measles virus case were wrong, and as a direct result all measles virologists are still wrong today: They have misinterpreted ordinary constituents of cells as part of the suspected measles virus.

Because of this error, during decades of consensus building process, normal cell constituents were mentally assembled into a model of a measles virus. To this day, an actual structure that corresponds to this model has been found neither in a human, nor in an animal. With the results of the genetic tests, all thesis of existence of measles virus has been scientifically disproved.

The authors of the six publications and all other persons involved, did not realise the error because they violated the fundamental scientific duty, which is the need to work “lege artis”, i.e. in accordance with internationally defined rules and best practice of science. They did not carry out any control experiments. Control experiments would have protected authors and mankind from this momentous error. This error became the basis of belief in the existence of any disease-causing viruses. The expert appointed by the court, Prof. Dr. Dr. Podbielski, answering to the relevant question by the court, as per page 7 of the protocol explicitly confirmed that the authors did not conduct any control experiments.

The OLG Stuttgart on 16 February 2016 overturned the judgment of the court of first instance, dismissed the action and referred, inter alia, to the central message of Prof. Podbielski with respect to the six publications. The plaintiff filed an appeal against the judgment of the OLG to the Supreme Court. As reason he stated his subjective, yet factually false perception of the trial sequence at the court in Stuttgart, and the assertion that our naming of facts about measles posed a threat to public health. The plaintiff’s position was rejected by the Supreme Court in plain words. Thus, the Supreme Court confirmed the judgment of the OLG Stuttgart from 16 February 2016.

Conclusions

The six publications submitted in the trial are the main relevant publications on the subject of “measles virus.” Since further to these six publications there not any other publications which would attempt by scientific methods to prove the existence of the measles virus, the Supreme Court judgment in the measles virus trial and the results of the genetic tests have consequences: Any national and international statements on the alleged measles virus, the infectivity of measles, and on the benefit and safety of vaccination against measles, are since then of no scientific character and have thus been deprived of their legal basis.

Upon enquiries which had been triggered by the measles virus contest, the head of the National Reference Institute for Measles at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Prof. Dr. Annette Mankertz, admitted an important fact. This admission may explain the increased rate of vaccination-induced disabilities, namely of vaccination against measles, and why and how specifically this kind of vaccination seems to increasingly trigger autism.

Prof. Mankertz has admitted that the “measles virus” contains typical cell’s natural components (ribosomes, the protein factories of the cell). Since the vaccination against measles contains whole “whole measles virus”, this vaccine contains cell’s own structures. This explains why vaccination against measles causes frequent and more severe allergies and autoimmune reactions than other types of vaccination. The court expert Prof. Podbielski stated on several occasions that by the assertion of the RKI with regard to ribosomes in the measles virus, the thesis of existence of measles virus has been falsified.

In the trial it was also put on record that the highest German scientific authority in the field of infectious diseases, the RKI, contrary to its legal remit as per § 4 Infection Protection Act (IfSG), has failed to create tests for alleged measles virus and to publish these. The RKI claims that it made internal studies on measles virus, however refuses to hand over or publish the results.

  • rcwarbirdbuilder

    Time to weed out all of the parasitic global criminals.

  • Dr John

    This is all very strange since I was sent home from the second grade in the 50s with Red spots all over my face and body. All of the indications were, I had the measles. i had the fever and no real discomfort as was indicative of the measles. So if it did not exist, I could not have had it. Or was it that I did not exist. Or do I exit and everything about me is the projection of my imagination. Then they would be correct there is no measles beyond my imagination. But wait if they are part of my imagination how can the contradict my imagination. After all it is my dream, my world, my disease to have and hold.

    To think the courts could take away, steal a part of my childhood. Mind you the virus was one of the easiest to endure and did not warrant vaccines that endanger future generations. I missed a couple of days from school (darn) and kept myself busy reading and playing quietly while being cared for by my grandmother. No headaches, no disgusting expulsions, no stomach problems, just spots and a very low grade temperature. Best couple of days of the week. The spots did not even itch. Once they disappeared I had to go back to school, bummer.

    By the way most most viruses are PH dependent. If your PH is higher than the virus can withstand and is still within the appropriate range for your body; it cannot survive in your body.

  • tim mitchell

    This is an interesting finding, but I think that we should clarify that they are not saying that a virus does not cause the symptoms which we call Measles, only that what is currently called the Measles virus, genetically and biologically is only a collection of cell DNA segments which have been confused with an entity called the Measles virus. Also that we currently have not proven and cannot say for sure what causes the illness which we call Measles. The explanation which is given concerning why measles vaccines are so damaging is very good and interesting.

    One last comment that I would like to make is that although what we call the Measles illness is very damaging in some cases, but if we treat it in the same way as the old time doctors treated small pox, we have great success in removing it from the body. Measles, Chicken Pox and Small Pox are treated effectively using Cream of Tartar, L-lysine, and Vitamin C. L-lysine stops replication of some viruses, vitamin C helps fight invaders and protects the body, and Cream of Tartar is a blood cleanser which flushes the toxins from the body which cause the rash and damage to organs in the body.

    The reason our bodies produce a rash is that the toxins are unable to be flushed through our normal elimination channels and the toxins are being forced out through the skin… hence the rash. Once the toxins are being flushed out, the rash disappears. Having a teaspoon of Cream of Tartar several times a day for an adult during the illness in our experience is sufficient to remove the toxins.

    • https://autisticagainstantivaxxers.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/submissions/ Derp Turtle

      Weird. Why don’t Diphtheria and Pertussis with their TOXINS produce rashes then?

  • k3nw74

    This is a very big deal…

  • Ken S., As Seen On Watch Lists

    Anybody got the actual judgment?