NATO Commander Says Russia Poses ‘Existential Threat’

Is the increasing anti-Russian rhetoric presented by Washington and Europe a provocation towards war?

NATO Commander says Russia poses 'existential threat' to the West

NATO Supreme Commander Philip Breedlove has accused Russia of deliberately becoming an adversary of the West, and has warned that Russia poses an “existential threat” to the U.S. and the Western world. 

U.S. Defense Secretary Ash Carter added fuel to the fire by accusing Russia of intimidating its neighbours, saying that he doubts Moscow is committed to strategic stability on nuclear weapons.

Both of these anti-Russian views were given by Carter and Breedlove in testimony before two congressional committees on February 25, reflecting the growing anti-Russian mood in Washington and Europe. reports:

Breedlove has been one the most vocal critics of Russia among top U.S. military brass since Moscow annexed Ukraine’s Crimea Peninsula in March 2014 and subsequently backed separatists fighting Kyiv’s forces in eastern Ukraine.

Russia has repeatedly dismissed assertions by U.S. and European officials that it presents a threat to the West, portraying the accusations as dangerous saber-rattling.

Breedlove told the U.S. House Armed Services Committee that Russia was seeking to “rewrite the agreed rules of the international order,” and undermine unity in Europe.

“Russia has chosen to be an adversary and poses a long-term existential threat to the United States and to our European allies and partners,” he told the committee.

Carter, speaking before the House Appropriations Committee, asserted that Russia seemed intent “to erode the principled international order that has served us, our friends and allies, the international community, and also Russia itself so well for so long.”

“Moscow’s nuclear saber-rattling,” Carter said, raised questions about Russian leaders’ “commitment to strategic stability” and “whether they respect the profound caution that nuclear-age leaders showed with regard to brandishing nuclear weapons.”

Russia’s military doctrine updated in recent years laid out new guidelines for the use of nuclear weapons, and Russia’s ongoing deployment to Syria has been widely seen as a showcase for new weaponry and a training ground for new military tactics.

“To be clear, the United States does not seek a cold, let alone hot war with Russia. We do not seek to make Russia an enemy, even as it may view us that way,” he said. “But make no mistake — we will defend our interests, our allies, the principled international order, and the positive future it affords us all.”

The United States and NATO has moved slowly to adjust to Russian actions, which have included increased bomber and fighter-jet flights near NATO members’ borders, as well as the military deployment to Syria, Russia’s largest in decades.

The Pentagon’s budget request for the coming fiscal year includes a $3.4 billion quadrupling of spending to bolster European defense. And NATO recently announced plans to begin rotating up to a brigade-sized, multinational force into some Eastern European and Baltic States, in an effort to reassure alliance members.

In a markedly acerbic statement posted on Facebook late on February 25, Russia’s Defense Ministry mocked the statements by Carter and what it said were similar comments by CIA officials.

“Such tide rises every year at the same time. The reason is simple: discussion of the military budget for the next year. It is not the thing to be impressed by,” the ministry said.

“It is important to keep in mind the fact that since the middle of the previous century the ‘Russian threat’ has been the Pentagon’s most ‘sellable’ threat to both the U.S. Congress and to its NATO partners,” the ministry said. “What would they have done without us?”