Latest

Trump Warns Flu Shots Are The Greatest ‘Scam’ In Medical History

The flu shot is a scam, created by Big Pharma to make money off vulnerable people and make them sick, warns President Trump.

The flu shot is the greatest scam in medical history, created by Big Pharma to make money off vulnerable people and make them sick, warns President Donald Trump.

In an interview with Opie and Anthony on Sirius XM, Trump slammed flu shots as “totally ineffective” and declared that he has never had one.


I’ve never had one. And thus far I’ve never had the flu. I don’t like the idea of injecting bad stuff into your body. And that’s basically what they do. And this one (latest flu vaccine) has not been very effective to start off with.

I have friends that religiously get the flu shot and then they get the flu. You know, that helps my thinking. I’ve seen a lot of reports that the last flu shot is virtually totally ineffective.

Trump is right – flu shots are the greatest medical fraud in history. They are full of “bad stuff” including formaldehyde and mercury – two powerful neurotoxins – and the vaccine industry even admits that laboratory tests prove the popular jab does not work.

Why is a toxic, medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo faith-based dogma and clever marketing, pushed on the whole population every year?

Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media. Congress even passed a law protecting the vaccine industry with absolute legal immunity, even when they manufacture and sell defective products that injure and kill people.

And vaccine manufacturers have been lying to us for years about toxic levels of mercury in flu shots. 

Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human body. That’s not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists.

So why won’t manufacturers remove the mercury? And why does Big Pharma continue to push a product that the vaccine industry admits does not even work?

Baxter Dmitry
Follow me

Baxter Dmitry

Writer at Your News Wire
Passionate about motor sports, military history and the truth, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one.
Baxter Dmitry
Follow me
Baxter Dmitry
About Baxter Dmitry (621 Articles)
Passionate about motor sports, military history and the truth, Baxter has travelled in over 80 countries and won arguments in every single one.
  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vekf_2952U HWR
    • John P

      Perfect! Straight from the talmud!

  • notinrussia

    I cant believe he said all this….. Even if you don’t like the guy….RESPECT

    • Patty Wright

      I love the guy and one reason is because he is always right

      • Deborah Sprague Dunning

        lol

      • Jackie Puppet

        The funny thing is, he says stuff that people think is outlandish, or echoes what a lot of us already know/believe, then days later, the media reluctantly admits (if they do), he’s right.

  • rcwarbirdbuilder

    Please drain the swap quicker.

  • Frank C

    As to the last question, I can answer in 4 words:
    MONEY and AGENDA 21

    • Sandra Howard-Blanz

      I know about agenda 21 (think there are only 3 of us that do). What does it have to say about this, don’t remember if I read that.

  • John P

    Q: “Why is a toxic, medical hoax, backed by nothing but voodoo faith-based
    dogma and clever marketing, pushed on the whole population every year?
    A: The Jews.

    • John

      get it right they are JEWISH not jews they were converted the real JEWS scattered throughout the four corners of the earth. Revelation 2 verse 9 those who call themselves JEWS are NOT but are the SYNAGOGUE of SATAN.

      • Tara McFly

        Their true nomenclature is Khazars. Nothing jew (ish) about them….

  • ladykatie25

    My husband was blackmailed into getting his very first flu shot this year. More and more businesses are doing this. It’s either get the shot or they fire you or up your insurance premiums to where you can’t afford them. He is 59, never ever had influenza and never ever had a flu shot. I got my very first flu shot at age 45, thinking it was a good thing. I had never had influenza either. But that year, not only did I get the flu a few weeks later, I had extreme vertigo the next day, followed by tinnitus that has NEVER gone away. My husband has also had negative effects from his flu shot. He didn’t connect the dots, but I did. A few days after his shot, he complained of joint pain. Every other day, it was another joint. His hands hurt him terribly now. I thought, where is this coming from? You were fine before the shot. So I googled joint pain and the flu shot and there were tons of others asking the same questions. I think I have my answer. It angers the hell out of me that vaccines, which have been PROVEN to be unsafe by scientists who actually DO research, are FORCED upon us and our children. I hope to God, they will not become mandatory, now that Trump is in office. Babies die now from vaccines. Can you imagine how you’d feel if you absolutely did not want to give your child a certain vaccine and they MADE you and your child died? That WILL happen to someone, if they make all vaccines mandatory. If it’s your choice to vaccinate, then that’s on you. But if you don’t want to, it will be like the government killed your child.

  • Gkiter

    His stance on vaccines is about the only thing that is true and makes sense that ever came and will come out of his mouth.

    • DickHair

      You need to pay better attention then Sparky.

  • Ivan Pihama

    Vaccines shots are worth 27 billion dollars a year in the u.s, last year pharmaceutical companies sold 425 billion dollars of drugs with the u.s government picking up the tab for 325 billion.

    • Lady

      Please tell more. I hate vaccines and mandatory is illegal.

  • Debbie

    I wish he would make it where employers could not push employees to take it. Most that work in health care must take the shot or wear a mask at all times.

    • Roger Heart

      I absolutely agree !

  • ricck lineheart

    GOOD GOOD GOOD !!!!…Big Pharma just took a B*tch slap !….Thank you Mr. President !

    • Roger Heart

      I have NOT had a Flu shot since 1971 and refuse to get one . I had a family member that every year got the Flu shot and then would get miserably sick .

  • Selena Roberts Scott

    The last time I had the flu was when I was 19 years old. After that I refused to take another shot…and since then I never had the flu and I am 64 years old….Trump is right!!! DO NOT TAKE THE FLU SHOT

  • Shawn_Siegel

    Well, he almost had it right – vaccination itself is the greatest scam in medical history. As for the flu vaccine being ineffective, there are enough cases of resulting Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis and death to prove him wrong.

    • Patty B

      I know someone who had Gulliain Barre as a result of the flu shot… damn near killed him. Almost 2 years recovering and lost a job.

  • Elizabeth

    I’m liking these comments. I haven’t even read ten of them and I already see “Agenda 21” mentioned

    #informed

  • Scalenguy

    I have a post-surgery nurse friend who told me this over twenty years ago there are dozens of potential strains of influenza every year and they take a guess at which one shows the most promise for developing into something, mass produce a vaccine, and voila! It’s fear mongering big pharmaceutical greed at its finest.

    • Luke Sanborn

      Epidemiology =/= some guess.

      But let’s go ahead and boil down very complex sciences to extremely simple (and incorrect) concepts.

  • Skeptical

    Uuummmm, I just listened to that whole video you provided. All he says is that he doesn’t get the flu shot. He even says “I don’t get them, but that doesn’t mean other people shouldn’t”. Quite a leap you took from the truth there Baxter.

  • http://hightechforum.org/ Richard Bennett

    I get the flu shot several times a year because it gets me high. It’s really mellow buzz, try it out sometime.

    • Elliot Faulk

      dude are you stoned or just trolling haha sounds like something i would have posted yeterday when blitzed

      • http://hightechforum.org/ Richard Bennett

        Dude, this year’s flu shots are totally far out. Colors and everything, check it out.

  • Patty B

    Stopped getting flu shots 16 years ago, and no flu.. not even the so called horrible H1N1 they were spreading such fear about.. Always believed it to be a marketing ploy for drug companies to make money. Now how about an answer to those chemtrails in the sky that are spraying stuff on us to us as human guinea pigs for all types of crap..

    • fanofjesus

      well, it’s another reason to do all you can to keep your immune system strong; we have to take our health into our own hands–be educated about minerals, supplements, vitamins, etc etc.

  • VERNA DISTAD

    NOVEMBER 2014 MY NIECE AGE43 DIED 2 DAYS AFTER SHE GOT THE FLU SHOT.

  • mendy

    I take a wheatgrass,spinach,power greens from costco with water or almond milk everyday in a green smoothie. My husband and I started this in 2009, We have never once got the flu since then, although I’m a nurse and many people get sick around me and my patients are all sick, and my children refuse to try it and they get sick. I have patients that get the flu shot and they are always sick after..and some have died.

    • Luke Sanborn

      Your nursing education should have prepared you a little better. In your short, three-sentence entry, there are a number of misconceptions and instances of faulty logic. First, your personal experiences are meaningless when it comes to population statistics. Second, your children refusing to try your smoothie, and getting sick, is meaningless because you’re not proving that your smoothie does anything to begin with (unless you have some evidence that wheatgrass, spinach, power greens(?), or almond milk strengthen your immunity at regular exposure levels). Third, people do often get “sick” for a short time after vaccination because they are being inoculated with something that is causing their immune system to react (you know the response that results in sickness) so that the actual virus is easily recognized if encountered. Lastly, having patients that get sick or die in your care after receiving a vaccination is not that surprising since you work in an occupation full of sick people who are prone to further sickness, and yes, death. I can assure you that if you worked at an accounting firm, and everyone were vaccinated one day, you would not see your coworkers experience anything past minor discomfort, and certainly not death.

  • Dennis Davis

    I went to my doctor for a check up. While I was there my doctor said I needed a flu shot. I told him last time I got one I got sick. He said the vaccines are better than they use to be. So I got a flu shot and then I spent two weeks in the hospital with the flu.. Trump is right.

    • fanofjesus

      Yes, unfortunately, doctors are “in on” the conspiracy to kill people with “medicine”

  • velcro

    Moonbeam (Cali’s Governor) signed bill to force all parents to have their kids given all the shots Big Pharma ordered, or they can’t go to school. If the shots work, why do people who have had them get all the diseases? They say it stops the diseases, I say the measles, mumps and chicken pox stopped due to our sanitation system and everyone being cleaner. Look back at photo’s of kids during the depression, dirty clothes and bodies. They only took baths once a week or some once a month.

  • dingleberries1972

    It always has amazed me anyone thinks that all these extra vaccines that are pushed on us are supposed to make us live longer. How do you prove that a flu shot prevented you from getting the flu? You cant! Vaccines sell the idea of healthy when in fact you are no healthier. The most expensive cost on government is the last several years of our lives. They want to eliminate those years.

  • Norbert Thomas

    Formaldehyde is naturally occurring. There is more formaldehyde in a single apple or produced naturally in our bodies every day than there is in a vaccine shot. To break it down:

    Formaldehyde in a multi-dose vaccine: approx. 300µg.
    Formaldehyde in one apple: approx. 430-1500µg. (up to 3 times more than in the vaccine)
    Formaldehyde produced naturally in a child’s body every day: approx. 48000µg. (160 times more than in the vaccine)

    Thimerosal contains ethylmercury, which is a different chemical to elemental mercury or to methylmercury (which is found in fish). Methylmercury bioaccumulates, which is why it is bad. Ethylmercury does not bioaccumulate. It is a different chemical. Sodium and chloride are both harmful to us. Sodium choride is a different chemical and happens to be quite good for us.

    These are basic scientific facts. The ‘irrational anti-science denialists’ are the ones who cannot accept these facts.

    • Casper

      Someone has been drinking the cool-aid.

      Ever seen anyone inject an apple into their bloodstream?

      EU regulation 605/2014. Formaldehyde marked as carcinogenic 1B and mutagenic 2:

      http://www.eco-institut.de/en/home/detail/in-the-eu-formaldehyde-has-been-classified-as-carcinogenic-1b-and-mutagenic-2/

      Do you even know that the FDA has never properly assessed the toxicity of ethylmercury?

      http://i.imgur.com/KM72Huh.png

      How about checking some medical literature on the subject, instead of drinking cool-aid?

      “There appears to be little difference in the neurotoxicity of MeHg and EthylHg”. The Neuropathogenesis of mercury toxicity. PMID: 12142946

      http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/v7/n2s/pdf/4001176a.pdf?origin=publication_detail

      “Differential immunotoxic effects of inorganic and organic mercury species in vitro.” Both organic and inorganic species of mercury can affect the human immune system

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20600710

      “Autism: a novel form of mercury poisoning.” A comprehensive analysis is included on the comordities of autism and their corresponding analogs due to mercury exposure.

      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339848

      “Toxicity of ethylmercury (and Thimerosal): a comparison with methylmercury”

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23401210

      “Toxicological effects of thiomersal and ethylmercury: Inhibition of the thioredoxin system and NADP(+)-dependent dehydrogenases of the pentose phosphate pathway.”

      https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25981166

      The science does not seem to support the statement that ethylmercury is pure angel dust.

      • Luke Sanborn

        The common misunderstanding here is that toxicological effects are dose dependent, and in vitro studies expose targeted cells to much higher concentrations of ethyl mercury than found in vaccines. What’s more, even one of the papers you linked to states that in vitro effects of ethyl and methyl mercury are similar, but that ethyl mercury is eliminated at a much higher rate than methyl mercury. This means that it is much harder to reach cumulative, toxicological levels.

        What’s pretty funny is that some might say that this theoretical “toxic build-up” causes autism, but, somehow, all the cases of actual mercury poison are non-existent. Even in the link you provided (an article from 2001, before this topic had been thoroughly studied), the authors only suggest that the medical literature SUGGESTS a possible link between mercury and autism, and that autism may be a previously idiopathic form of poisoning. But, again, if it is only one form of mercury poisoning, and it is becoming more prevalent with increasing use of vaccinations, where are all the clear-cut cases of mercury poisoning each year?

        I can appreciate your concern, and you are certainly attempting to clarify this topic for yourself and others, but you should do a better job of examining the “kool-aid” before proclaiming that it is unsafe to drink (especially since it is actually damaging to the population if enough people decide not to).

    • Jackie Puppet

      Us “Irrational anti-science deniers” are not against the concept of vaccines, per se. It is quite solid.

      We’re just against the adjuvants and other garbage that’s also included in the vaccine, that doctors do not wish to inform their patients about.

  • Jan Adkinson

    I don’t know if President Trump actually said this, however, I agree with it. I was required to have a flu shot in 1992 when I worked with the elderly, and I got sick. I haven’t had one since – and I am now one of “the elderly.” I’ve not had the flu, either. Of course some doctors will not agree, but guess who provides them with sample vaccines? I don’t believe in introducing drugs and possible impurities into an otherwise healthy body.

  • Sean Wallace

    Idiot words from an idiot. Not a shred of truth in this whole article.

  • Frederick A Miller

    I just got my flu shot and now I regret that I did so. sick as a dog . I will never get another one period………………what a rip off .

  • http://helsekonsulenten.dk Niels Christensen

    I had a flu shot around 1990. Before that time I did not get the flu, even if others around me did, but after the shot my immune system suffered and I got the flu about every year. I will never get another flu shot. It is fraud.

  • ImajWalker

    I haven’t had a vaccination either..in 62 years and never had so much as a cold!
    After researching how Bill Gates wants to depopulate the world by more than 90%.. it wouldn’t surprise me
    if he DID put crap in the vaccines to help that along!
    SAME AS CLIMATE CHANGE..it’s a BIG MONEY MAKING LIE / SCAM!

  • disqus_aL15HmtFha

    My god ole mighty. Is everyone now going to follow and copy everything Mutt does or says???? Jesus christ. Im an informed parent, mother, consumer. Im listening to my Dr. thank you, vs a two bit women abuser who hasn’t the first idea about ANYTHING let alone medicine. Small incidents will always happen with everthing in life. Doesnt mean its “bad” for you. People die wearing seat belts when involved in accidents but almost everyone still wears them because the neg outweighs pos. Same for vacs. And what about those who are stricken with terminal or serious sickness? By you not getting vacs those who make the terrible desision are putting those people at deadly risk….

    • fanofjesus

      my question to you would be: did you have any problem with the fact that bill clinton was raping and sexually abusing/harrassing women? Were you okay with the fact that his wife, hillary (a supposed feminist) was subsequently harassing and threatening those same women to remain silent?

      • fanofjesus

        =crickets……=

  • http://sharkasnotes.blogspot.com.au/ Sharka Todd

    My mother had a bad reaction to the flu vaccine a number of years ago. It was her last vaccine. I’ve never had the flu that I know of and so have no interest in taking such a preventative, whether it be trustworthy and effective or not.

  • Luke Sanborn

    “Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media.”

    It’s actually ironic that the case that is referred to in the “and the vaccine industry even admits that laboratory tests prove the popular jab does not work” comment deals specifically with Merck’s MMR vaccine, which the whistle-blowers claimed did not achieve the 95% REQUIRED efficacy by the FDA (which, inadvertently, implies that vaccines ARE effective in preventing diseases from spreading). So it seems that the author here hasn’t done his homework.

    Nevertheless, maybe that is only a minor point. However, the broader argument looks to be whether vaccines are effective in lowering disease incidence from year to year. And the answer is YES, by a lot. In referring to that same case against Merck, which is ongoing, the CDC has found that the number of Mumps cases each year in the U.S. before implementing the vaccine was about 150,000. After its implementation, the number of cases has dropped into the 100s and 1000s (i.e. vaccines have prevented about 99% of potential Mumps cases in a given year). What should also be noted is that the number of cases of Mumps after implementing this supposed “less efficacious” vaccine has not risen any more than in previous years. Not only do vaccines, in general, work, but the specific case against Merck, which was presented to refute vaccine efficacy, is actually a testament to their utility.

    But let’s get back to the unqualified opinions of NaturalNews and Donald Trump…..

    • fanofjesus

      But what is hard to fight is the anecdotal evidence, given by hundreds of individuals, of the extreme harm that they (or their loved ones) suffered from vaccines. You can’t mollify their pain and loss with statistics that vaccines were “globally helpful” to the population.

      • Luke Sanborn

        What you are asking for–absolutely no risk and all the reward–is impossible to satisfy. On the one hand, we have a situation where millions of incidences of disease are prevented, which itself means saving tens-to-hundreds of thousands of lives per year, as well as their chronic, lifetime effects, and saving substantially more in overall healthcare costs. On the other hand, we have fewer than 2,000 incidences of vaccine-related injury per year; what’s more, VERY few of these cases actually result in death, and the others, many of which have been reported on anecdotally, lead to few lasting symptoms or effects because their medical treatment is fully covered by allotted government funds.

        It is puzzling that one can concede so much to this topic (assuming that you are not disputing anything I’ve written above or in my previous comment) and still look to vaccines as the medical practice that should be eradicated (again, assuming that this is your overall stance). Risks exist for virtually all medical procedures and practices, and the risk from vaccines is relatively low when compared to other forms of treatment. But no movements exist to get rid of chemotherapy and radiation, or to cease surgical procedures.

        Remember this: anything that is “globally helpful” is, statistically, personally beneficial.

        • fanofjesus

          I never stated that I think that vaccines in and ot themselves shoud not be used; the core idea-that of introducing a smidgen of the virus, etc. and allowing the body to produce proper antibodies against a full-blown attack–is a good practice. The problem with them is that it can be proved that what they are adding to them has been found to be unacceptably deleterious to health. Tell that one poster -Verna distad-who said her 43-yr-old neice died four days after a flu shot that she should think in terms of statistics. I don’t know where you get your stats of 2,000 incidents of vaccine-related injury, but I’ll bet it’s not from the “anti-vaccine” sites.

          • Luke Sanborn

            You are certainly correct about that: I didn’t get that figure from anti-vaccine sites. I got it from the CDC; and I was being generous by overshooting the yearly average. I’m not sure why you would think that anti-vaccine websites would be the most reliable source for this information. I’ve already shown that the very article this discussion is based on is extremely flawed and full of incorrect information, so it really doesn’t help your case.

            As for the person you are using as an example of personal grievance toward vaccines, it is simply an aside from the actual debate. The question is whether we choose the huge risk of not vaccinating or the tiny risk from vaccination. One MUST be chosen because there are literally no other options. (As a side note, don’t think that I am in any way saying that injury or death in this context are meaningless, they’re tragic, but I will always choose the option that results in fewer overall).

            Imagine the converse scenario where people KNOW (as we do now) that vaccines exist and work as they do. Would you be able to argue the point to hundreds of thousands of parents that their child’s death due to preventable disease is justified to save the few who would be injured by the cure? Their grief is just as meaningful as that of those who do lose children to vaccine injury.

          • fanofjesus

            Luke, the reason that you and I will never come to an understanding about this issue is that you don’t share my belief that our government is controlled by evil people–globalists and satanists, who have been slowly but surely putting in place a “population reduction” program, through all the means available to them. As such, they control many if not most government agencies and other institutions. I have been paying attention to the fallout from this for many years, so I expect our govt agencies, such as the cdc, to lie to us.
            The site I can recommend for actual research, interviews with experts, etc–not just rhetoric–is http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/vaccination/
            So to me, it’s not just a matter of “the few that would be injured by the cure”; but rather the need to fight against a tyranical, treacherous govt (and I don’t expect trumps admin to be much different).
            So, you can just laugh at me, or you can look at “alternative news” aka “the real news”. and read some of those reports.

          • Luke Sanborn

            I can honestly say that I have no intention of laughing at you. Unfortunately, what you are describing–this widespread conspiracy towards population reduction–just doesn’t hold up. Notice how you have disputed none of the facts I have presented outside of the figure given by the CDC, and, instead of offering your own figure, you jump to a government-is-run-by-evil-people position, with no real reason to think that way. Yes, you believe it, but this belief is faulty and meaningless. Why MUST those in a position of power be pure evil?

            As for the population reduction argument, let’s suppose this WERE actually true. The only conclusion we could possibly gather is that the supposed evil people in charge are so inept at their endeavors that the population has grown just as much as it would without any organized interference at all. That is to say, there has been absolutely no drop in population numbers, or in population growth rates, to provide evidence for this premise.

            You are, understandably, scaring yourself into a position of complete defensiveness and disbelief that is not reality-based. You should seriously examine your own motivations for WANTING to believe these things; many, which I believe include you, feel that they achieve a position of intellectual superiority by not allowing themselves to have the “wool pulled over their eyes”. But this line of reasoning and cherry-picking of loosely related content only moves you further away from authentic information and real truths.

            I have seen the link you have provided, and it, like all the other faulty info seen here, is easy to repudiate.

        • Andrew Kinsella

          The differences between chemotherapy, radiation and vaccines are
          1) The first 2 treatments require informed consent, and the idea of informed consent is not valid if there are legally mandated penalties for not consenting. Plenty of us object purely on this basis. I would go further and say that the extraordinary step of suspending our freedoms actually requires extraordinary evidence of safety and efficacy.
          2) Non vaccine treatments require far more stringent testing before they are licensed than vaccines do. The history of vaccines is littered with cases where vaccines were hastily brought to market and avoidable harms ensued.
          3) The special protection that vaccine manufacturers get against being sued naturally makes anybody who has any grasp of business and consumer law suspicious.
          4) Additives to vaccines remain a concern. As I stated above, even the CDC’s scientists have now concluded that there are avoidable harms associated with ethyl mercury. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161558
          Equally, there is ample evidence to show that aluminum (an adjuvant in vaccines) is toxic, and is associated with Alzheimer’s disease and gulf war syndrome. As Aluminum is also NOT a natural contaminant of our pre- industrial environment, it is highly unlikely that we have evolved to tolerate exposure to it.
          5) Finally the real harms associated with many of the illnesses we vaccinate against are actually very low, and the success rate of the vaccines overstated.

          I think most of us are not arguing for vaccine abolition, but against compulsion.

          • Luke Sanborn

            1. This is your strongest point, but here we get into more philosophical territory. And the argument is that, unlike chemo and radiation, vaccination status has a direct effect on those around you, and there is a direct, measurable community impact when enough people are not immunized (which we have ample evidence of in recent history as a direct result of the anti-vaccine movement). And, again, it really goes back to the demonstrable, irrefutable fact that, in the absence of vaccines, our very communities would be plagued with much more disease and suffering. Any objection solely based on this is an argument that puts the cart before the horse, and it undermines the basis and purpose of the anti-vaccine movement itself. As for demonstrated safety and efficacy, I’ve already discussed that in my previous comment, so you’d have to dispute those points specifically or provide more, relevant information.
            2. You’d have to give more information regarding the “stringency” of vaccine testing vs non-vaccine testing to make this point more concrete (again, the FDA requires 95% efficacy for vaccines). As for the cases you are referring to where “avoidable harm” has been incurred, I’m assuming that the cases you cite must have resulted in MUCH more vaccine injury in those given years than the approximate 2,000 vaccine-injuries-per-year figure I obtained from the CDC; and these incidences must also have occurred in recent history to be any indication of the current risk we take in exposing individuals to vaccine injury. As for the assumed “avoidable harm”, you must also factor in the projected harm of doing nothing in these situations.
            3. Admittedly, I don’t have much knowledge of business/consumer law, but vaccines, like the one mentioned in the above article, are developed from government contracts, and they are developed as a government service because they are of extreme benefit to society, as a whole. Additionally, there is a program in place to completely compensate and provide care for those who do fall victim to vaccine injury, so there is no need for legal recourse.
            4. In the link you provided, the conclusion states that: “The difference in manifested toxicity of MeHg and EtHg are likely the result of the differences in exposure, metabolism, and elimination from the body, rather than differences in mechanisms of action between the two.” So, while you highlight the fact that MeHg and EtHG have, in vitro, physiologically similar effects, you fail to acknowledge their measurable differences in metabolism and elimination, in vivo. AND you fail to take into consideration the exposure levels seen in vaccines (many anti-vaxxers conflate the amount of mercury exposure in a single dose with the referenced, DAILY exposure amounts required for mercury toxicity). Simply put, unless a child/person were getting vaccinated nearly every day, they are not going to have problems with mercury toxicity, and we have, unsurprisingly, not seen increases in incidence of mercury toxicity.
            As for aluminum exposure, the link to Alzheimer’s is highly disputed, and, again, we have not seen any measurable increase in incidences of aluminum toxicity (which we would expect if aluminum exposure were a problem).
            It’s unfortunate and disheartening, but I feel like I have to explicitly state that a POTENTIAL for harm is meaningless if we, as a society, are not actually experiencing the negative effects of the supposed harmful substance (again, let’s not make the mistake of putting the cart before the horse).
            5. This point is patently false. Before systemic and controlled vaccine implementation, death and illness from now-preventable diseases was very common. And each year that we do use vaccines, we are effectively decreasing or eliminating death, suffering, and healthcare costs.

            It really is perplexing that we live in a world that has wholly benefited from a relatively safe medical practice, but we now have individuals who have not lived long enough to directly experience the obvious drawbacks of the world as it was before this practice, and they will latch onto any and every reason to fight back against a treatment that has probably, in some way–i.e. at some point in their history–benefited them personally.

            Make no mistake, we live in a world where, 100 years ago, 1/3 of the world was decimated by Spanish Flu. There is a very measurable probability that you are alive due to the fact that we have vaccines.

  • Dmitriy Aseev

    Here is a groundless (“Donald Trump agrees with me” is not a scientific evidence) statement from the article, “Vaccines are the one medicine where no scientific evidence of safety or efficacy is required by anyone: not the FDA, not the CDC and not the media.”

    According to CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), “…studies show vaccine reduces the risk of flu illness by about 50% to 60%…”. They publish the studies, by the way.

    Also, according to CDC, “Flu vaccines are among the safest medical products in use. Hundreds of millions of Americans have safely received flu vaccines over the past 50 years, and there has been extensive research supporting the safety of flu vaccines.”

    You may have heard that thimerosal has mercury in it. Not all types of mercury are the same. Some types of mercury, like mercury in some kinds of fish, stay in the human body and can make people sick. Thimerosal is a different kind of mercury. It doesn’t stay in the body, and is unlikely to make us sick.

    Another outcry from the article, “Everybody knows mercury is toxic to inject into the human body. That’s not debated except by irrational anti-science denialists. So why won’t manufacturers remove the mercury?”

    So, here is more on this topic from the “irrational anti-science denialists” also known as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “You may have heard that thimerosal has mercury in it. Not all types of mercury are the same. Some types of mercury, like mercury in some kinds of fish, stay in the human body and can make people sick. Thimerosal is a different kind of mercury. It doesn’t stay in the body, and is unlikely to make us sick.”

    More on safety from the same source, “Is thimerosal safe? Yes. Thimerosal has been used safely in vaccines for a long time (since the 1930s). Scientists have been studying the use of thimerosal in vaccines for many years. They haven’t found any evidence that thimerosal causes harm.”

    Is thimerosal still used in vaccines for children? No. Thimerosal hasn’t been used in vaccines for children since 2001. However, thimerosal is still used in some flu vaccines.”

    Now, do you eat fish?

    According to EPA, the levels of mercury in a small sample of albacore canned tuna averaged 0.560 micrograms of mercury per gram of tuna. The average reported by FDA in 2012 is 0.350 micrograms per gram. Source: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/canned-tuna-may-contain-excessive-mercury/

    In the first case, an 113 gram (4 oz) can of albacore tuna contains 63 micrograms of mercury (0.560*113). In the second case, 39 micrograms (0.350*113). Want to remind that this is the type of mercury, unlike thimerosal, that stays in the human body and can make people sick.

    A vaccine that significantly reduces chances of serious health complications from the flu or a fish sandwich that makes you fatter?

    FDA says, “A vaccine containing 0.01% thimerosal as a preservative contains 50 micrograms of thimerosal per 0.5 mL dose or approximately 25 micrograms of mercury per 0.5 mL dose.” Source: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineSafety/UCM096228

    Vaccines helped to eradicate many diseases and decrease the morbidity and mortality rate. Many of you are alive just because your ancestors got vaccinated from one disease or another.

  • http://outube.com/user/BereanBeacon Dave Falanga
  • apache54

    VERY NICE to hear our president say what we the people (those who are awake) know about the flu scam shots!! I hope this means he also knows and will do something about ALL the other BOGUS crap!! the big PHARMA’S are doing to us!

    • fanofjesus

      trump seems to be aware of the globalist’s evil plans, but he must be careful how he exposes them–slowly but surely

  • Jay

    May God bless President Trump.
    How high do you want us to jump?
    President Trump has done more good during his first week in office than Reagan did in 8 years and the rest of the Presidents all put together.

    • fanofjesus

      And I think that that is thanks to the fact that he truly is a political “outsider”.

  • Shepherd

    I have stopped having vaccinations and flu shots since I checked them out and found out what was in them. Think of this: How many children in the 40’s and 50’s had leukemia? How many children were autistic? I know there were some, but not as many as you see today. I was born in 1941, there were very few. The disease of that day was polio. People should start educating themselves. Just listen to advertisements on TV and pay close attention to the adverse reactions of the medication advertised. My gosh, some reactions can kill you; kidney failure, pancreatitis, heart failure, strokes, etc. I am not aware if there has been anything published regarding what reactions there are to childhood vaccinations. Our country is not what we see with our natural eyes. Don’t believe everything someone tells you. Check it out yourself.

  • Jackie Puppet

    My mom told me she recently got a flu shot, and I asked her why, when they are guessing at what strain of flu will be going around every year. She thinks they’re about 60% likely to be effective, and I told her it’s much, much lower, and that she’s more likely to get sick from the shot. Guess who’s been sick for most of the past month? I told her I’ve barely had a cold over the past 4-5 years, and I don’t get shots. She kept trying to justify it, and I kept on rebutting her, remarking that doctors are pushing it because they get more money if they do from Big Pharma.

    • fanofjesus

      sorry about your mom. She sounds like the typical patient–being intimidated by their bullying and supposedly “knowing what’s best” for their patients. Good thing she has you to help guide her toward awareness and hopefully some revelation of the truth. I’ve managed to get my mom to substitute some homeopathic and herbal remedies for crap she was using, and she has liked them, but for the most part, she will not deviate from what the docs tell her to do/take, which has so far resulted her having a fall that put her in the hospital/rehab for a long time; but she doesn’t see the connection. Alas.

      • Jackie Puppet

        Thanks. I guess one sad aspect of trying to have discussions like this with elderly parents, is that since they haven’t had an “awakening” like a lot of us, I sometimes think that if they have that “awakening” at such a late point in their lives, they could have difficulty processing the fact that institutions they trusted their whole lives, lied to them. Or that seemingly unrelated world events do in fact, tie in together

        A couple of years ago, I tried to give my dad the book “One Second After”, and told him it was about what could happen if America had EMPs set off in our skies. He didn’t want to read it. I could see in his eyes he just wants to live out his retirement watching sports & CNN, and walking the dog – and not have any more worries.

        • fanofjesus

          I think that you hit at the heart of the problem getting the elderly to recognise that they are being hornswaggled by the medical establishment, namely, the wrenching process of facing the truth, which can be very stressful for an older person. As they say: “ignorance is bliss”. Fortunately for your dad and mom, they have you.

  • fanofjesus

    I too, as others have mentioned, had only one flu shot, when they came to our work-place and offered free flu shots. It was like: “well, everyone’s doing it”.
    After the shot, I was sick for four days with what seemed like the flu. That convinced me to never bother again. But, these days, they are almost militant about getting us to take those shots! Apparently, when I turn 65, I will be required to take the shingles vaccine or some such vaccine. I usually lie on the medical forms where they ask if you’ve had your vaccines; I say “yes”, hoping they’ll leave me alone.

  • Mike

    What a fantastic president. He’s cut from a different cloth. He can’t be bought and has no allegiance to any corporation. Big Pharma better get ready to be taken down a few notches from their NWO throne.

  • Bill Taylor

    took the flu shot once, required to by the basketball coach when the swine flu was the scare of the mid/late 70’s…been in the hospital one time with the flu about 2 weeks after getting the shot…….a person aged 65 today has likely been exposed to most of the flu strains that are common and already have acquired natural immunity to them……for full disclosure i must say i dont trust big pharma one iota.

  • Sandra Howard-Blanz

    Why do the big Pharmacys push the flu shot? Duh, money what else? Concern and caring for the public? Yeah, right.

  • Jim Scholle

    What’s the best remedy for warding off the “flu”….eat your fruits and vegetables and exercise to keep your immune system healthy. Ive since never had the flu.

  • 2017

    Donald Trump merely represents your society’s focus for the past few generations.

    It is time for you to focus on your beliefs about governance. Does that mean you wish to be of the elite? Or inclusive? Or that some should be included and others excluded?

    Such is what you are grappling with internally. For hidden agendas are being exposed. And you have been as much a part of those hidden agendas as is every one of your culture, your society.

    Political movements are not possible without followers. Even though you declare you are not part of a particular following, such is not possible. For the human you has subconsciously added to the mystery of governance for eons. You are you now – but you have not always been the same being. Adolf Hitler was not possible without society as a whole creating him.

    This thought, horrible as it is to many of you, is what you are wrestling with within you now. For indeed, society for eons before Adolf Hitler came to power believed the Jewish race inferior – based on the hanging of Jesus Christ. So the scapegoating continues. Muslims, homosexuals, women, nature and on and on all to be controlled by a superior.

    Scapegoating shifts with the times meaning scapegoating is a reality within human society, not a Universal reality.

    Political happenings throughout the world are a mirror to you of what you as a society have created. Do you wish to continue the current model or create a new one?

    If you wish to create a new model, you must first search within you to discover how you continue to support the current industrial/military model. How do you wish it to be different? Do you wish it to be different?

    If you do not wish the model to be different, it is time for you to embrace what you have created over the eons. If you wish it to be different, you have as much input as anyone how the current model needs to shift.

    Even though you are unique, you are part of the society in which you live. Take control of that power. Knowing that no one can lead you better than you can lead yourself. Stop giving your power away by telling yourself that you must accept things as they are. For by doing so, you neglect your being and your society.

    What are you going to do with your power?

    Many of you think you have little voice in governmental or even personal structures. You go to work every day for an employer you have little confidence in to earn a few dollars to pay the rent for a home you only mildly enjoy. Giving your power away minute by minute, day by day.

    If you are a powerful creator, and you are, why do you feel you have less power than a president, chancellor, neighbor, terrorist, or cleric? They are all humans like yourself.

    What kind of world do you wish to live in? That is now your focus, for once you love yourself, that love shines throughout the globe. Your light is going to change the world.

    And you are going to change the world in ways that feel right within your new 5D heart.

    Do not be frightened of that power, for you will likely shift your beliefs as you move further into 5D. But you must start somewhere creating the world in which you wish to live.

    It is time for you to start imagining that world. It does not have to be consistent with anyone – it is your world. So it is that you are becoming the lights of the world – one beacon after another. So be it. Amen. http://spiritlibrary.com/brenda-hoffman/creating-a-new-global-society

  • 2017

    DOCTORS WARN: WHY FLU SHOTS ARE MORE DANGEROUS THAN THE FLU ITSELF
    http://www.barenaturaltruth.com/flu-shots-dangerous-flu/

  • Benjamin Alarcon

    With regard to my argument, “what if I got the flu even after taking the vaccine?”, I always get the explanation that even if the vaccine is not 100 percent effective, the effect of the flu will it be as devastating or severe. I know I have a weak immune system. I easily catch a cold or the flu. Besides, I have other health issues that I cannot afford I have a severe case of the flu. I had pneumonia when I got a heart by-pass surgery. What am I to believe and who can I truly trust? Can the government not force the issue with drug comanies in order to safeguard the lives of millions of lives not only in the US but also throughout the world. We are so concerned about the safety of Americans with regard to terrorism… Why can we not also be concerned about the health issues that affect everyone. Not all of us are in an excellent state of health that we can easily shake off every flu strain that comes along. A flu pandemic is much more devastating to the US than any terrorist attack, because it has the potential to kill millions in a single pandemic event.

  • pat kell

    this should make alot of you angry:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z1RHWfJSo6w

  • Andrew Kinsella

    There is a comment further down to the effect that ethyl mercury in (now relatively few) vaccines is safe, whereas methylmercury is dangerous. However a report last year by the CDCs own scientists has concluded that ethylmercury is not safe. The article discussing this paper is at this link: http://www.ecowatch.com/cdc-mercury-vaccines-kennedy-2226257805.html (which, no doubt some willl try to disregard as a biassed source) however the research being referred to can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27161558

    Perfectly legitimate peer reviewed science. So the old idea that ethyl mercury is safe is now debunked, and pleasingly by the CDCs own scientists. “The 45-page meta-review of relevant science examines the various ways
    that mercury harms the human body. Its authors, John F. Risher, PhD, and Pamela Tucker, MD, are researchers in the CDC’s Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry”.